Literature DB >> 2120722

A priority rating system for public health programs.

D Vilnius1, S Dandoy.   

Abstract

When resources are limited, decisions must be made regarding which public health activities to undertake. A priority rating system, which incorporates various data sources, can be used to quantify disease problems or risk factors, or both. The model described in this paper ranks public health issues according to size, urgency, severity of the problem, economic loss, impact on others, effectiveness, propriety, economics, acceptability, legality of solutions, and availability of resources. As examples of how one State can use the model, rankings have been applied to the following health issues: acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, coronary heart disease, injuries from motor vehicle accidents, and cigarette smoking as a risk factor. In this exercise, smoking is the issue with the highest overall priority rating. The model is sensitive to the precision of the data used to develop the rankings and works best for health issues that are not undergoing rapid change. Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses can be incorporated into the model or used independently in the priority-setting process. Ideally, the model is used in a group setting with six to eight decision makers who represent the primary agency as well as external organizations. Using this method, health agencies, program directors, or community groups can identify the most critical issues or problems requiring intervention programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2120722      PMCID: PMC1580091     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  3 in total

1.  Cost-effective data: searching for the unicorn continues.

Authors:  K R Pelletier
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  1988

2.  The economic impact of traumatic injuries. One-year treatment-related expenditures.

Authors:  E J MacKenzie; S Shapiro; J H Siegel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-12-09       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Summary of findings of the School Health Education Evaluation: health promotion effectiveness, implementation, and costs.

Authors:  D B Connell; R R Turner; E F Mason
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.118

  3 in total
  12 in total

1.  Assessment of primary health care access status: an analytic technique for decision making.

Authors:  P J Fos; M A Zúniga
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  1999-12

2.  Should public health respect autonomy?

Authors:  S A Hall
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  The Italian health surveillance (SiVeAS) prioritization approach to reduce chronic disease risk factors.

Authors:  Eduardo J Simoes; Sergio Mariotti; Alessandra Rossi; Alicia Heim; Felipe Lobello; Ali H Mokdad; Emanuele Scafato
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  Petroleum scarcity and public health: considerations for local health departments.

Authors:  Daniel J Barnett; Cindy L Parker; Virginia A Caine; Mary McKee; Lillian M Shirley; Jonathan M Links
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Budget- and priority-setting criteria at state health agencies in times of austerity: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Jonathon P Leider; Beth Resnick; Nancy Kass; Katie Sellers; Jessica Young; Patrick Bernet; Paul Jarris
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  The Disease Impact Assessment System (DIAS).

Authors:  F Sainfort; P L Remington
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Priority-setting for evidence-based health outreach in community-based organizations: A mixed-methods study in three Massachusetts communities.

Authors:  Shoba Ramanadhan; Kasisomayajula Viswanath
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Disparities rank high in prioritized research, systems and service delivery needs in Missouri.

Authors:  Pamela K Xaverius; Sherri Homan; Paula F Nickelson; Leigh E Tenkku
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-02-23

9.  Advancing social connection as a public health priority in the United States.

Authors:  Julianne Holt-Lunstad; Theodore F Robles; David A Sbarra
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2017-09

10.  Determining Community Health Status Priorities in an Online Analytic Processing (OLAP) Environment.

Authors:  James Studnicki; John W Fisher
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2013-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.