Literature DB >> 21206963

Sensor-based fall risk assessment--an expert 'to go'.

M Marschollek1, A Rehwald, K H Wolf, M Gietzelt, G Nemitz, H Meyer Zu Schwabedissen, R Haux.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Falls are a predominant problem in our aging society, often leading to severe somatic and psychological consequences, and having an incidence of about 30% in the group of persons aged 65 years or above. In order to identify persons at risk, many assessment tools and tests have been developed, but most of these have to be conducted in a supervised setting and are dependent on an expert rater.
OBJECTIVES: The overall aim of our research work is to develop an objective and unobtrusive method to determine individual fall risk based on the use of motion sensor data. The aims of our work for this paper are to derive a fall risk model based on sensor data that may potentially be measured during typical activities of daily life (aim #1), and to evaluate the resulting model with data from a one-year follow-up study (aim #2).
METHODS: A sample of n = 119 geriatric inpatients wore an accelerometer on the waist during a Timed 'Up & Go' test and a 20 m walk. Fifty patients were included in a one-year follow-up study, assessing fall events and scoring average physical activity at home in telephone interviews. The sensor data were processed to extract gait and dynamic balance parameters, from which four fall risk models--two classification trees and two logistic regression models--were computed: models CT#1 and SL#1 using accelerometer data only, models CT#2 and SL#2 including the physical activity score. The risk models were evaluated in a ten-times tenfold cross-validation procedure, calculating sensitivity (SENS), specificity (SPEC), positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), classification accuracy, area under the curve (AUC) and the Brier score.
RESULTS: Both classification trees show a fair to good performance (models CT#1/CT#2): SENS 74%/58%, SPEC 96%/82%, PPV 92%/ 74%, NPV 77%/82%, accuracy 80%/78%, AUC 0.83/0.87 and Brier scores 0.14/0.14. The logistic regression models (SL#1/SL#2) perform worse: SENS 42%/58%, SPEC 82%/ 78%, PPV 62%/65%, NPV 67%/72%, accuracy 65%/70%, AUC 0.65/0.72 and Brier scores 0.23/0.21.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that accelerometer data may be used to predict falls in an unsupervised setting. Furthermore, the parameters used for prediction are measurable with an unobtrusive sensor device during normal activities of daily living. These promising results have to be validated in a larger, long-term prospective trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21206963     DOI: 10.3414/ME10-01-0040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Inf Med        ISSN: 0026-1270            Impact factor:   2.176


  24 in total

Review 1.  Aging society and gerontechnology: a solution for an independent living?

Authors:  A Piau; E Campo; P Rumeau; B Vellas; F Nourhashémi
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  Machine Learning in Aging: An Example of Developing Prediction Models for Serious Fall Injury in Older Adults.

Authors:  Jaime Lynn Speiser; Kathryn E Callahan; Denise K Houston; Jason Fanning; Thomas M Gill; Jack M Guralnik; Anne B Newman; Marco Pahor; W Jack Rejeski; Michael E Miller
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  [Sensor-based fall detection and prediction].

Authors:  M Marschollek; C Becker
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 4.  Assessing fall risk using wearable sensors: a practical discussion. A review of the practicalities and challenges associated with the use of wearable sensors for quantification of fall risk in older people.

Authors:  T Shany; S J Redmond; M Marschollek; N H Lovell
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.281

5.  What Does Big Data Mean for Wearable Sensor Systems? Contribution of the IMIA Wearable Sensors in Healthcare WG.

Authors:  S J Redmond; N H Lovell; G Z Yang; A Horsch; P Lukowicz; L Murrugarra; M Marschollek
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2014-08-15

6.  Sensor-derived physical activity parameters can predict future falls in people with dementia.

Authors:  Michael Schwenk; Klaus Hauer; Tania Zieschang; Stefan Englert; Jane Mohler; Bijan Najafi
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.140

Review 7.  Decision support at home (DS@HOME)--system architectures and requirements.

Authors:  Michael Marschollek
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Sensors vs. experts - a performance comparison of sensor-based fall risk assessment vs. conventional assessment in a sample of geriatric patients.

Authors:  Michael Marschollek; Anja Rehwald; Klaus-Hendrik Wolf; Matthias Gietzelt; Gerhard Nemitz; Hubertus Meyer zu Schwabedissen; Mareike Schulze
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Wearable sensors in healthcare and sensor-enhanced health information systems: all our tomorrows?

Authors:  Michael Marschollek; Matthias Gietzelt; Mareike Schulze; Martin Kohlmann; Bianying Song; Klaus-Hendrik Wolf
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2012-06-30

10.  A semi-quantitative method to denote generic physical activity phenotypes from long-term accelerometer data--the ATLAS index.

Authors:  Michael Marschollek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.