Literature DB >> 21206631

"Mean ± SEM" or "Mean (SD)"?

.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21206631      PMCID: PMC2959222          DOI: 10.4103/0253-7613.70402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0253-7613            Impact factor:   1.200


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, Use of descriptive statistics is very common in articles published in various medical journals. For the ratio and interval data following the normal distribution, the most common descriptive statistics is mean and standard deviation (SD) and for data not following the normal distribution, it is median and range. It is, however, observed in various medical journals that mean and standard error of mean (SEM) are used to describe the variability within the sample.[1] We, therefore, need to understand the difference between SEM and SD. The SEM is a measure of precision for an estimated population mean. SD is a measure of data variability around mean of a sample of population. Unlike SD, SEM is not a descriptive statistics and should not be used as such. However, many authors incorrectly use the SEM as a descriptive statistics to summarize the variability in their data because it is less than the SD, implying incorrectly that their measurements are more precise. The SEM is correctly used only to indicate the precision of estimated mean of population. Even then however, a 95% confidence interval should be preferred.[12] Further, while reporting mean and SD, instead of writing “mean ± SD” the better way of representation would be “mean (SD)” as it will decrease the chance of confusion with confidence interval.[2]
  2 in total

1.  Twenty statistical errors even you can find in biomedical research articles.

Authors:  Tom Lang
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.351

2.  Misuse of standard error of the mean (SEM) when reporting variability of a sample. A critical evaluation of four anaesthesia journals.

Authors:  P Nagele
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.166

  2 in total
  6 in total

1.  Mean (standard deviation) or mean (standard error of mean): time to ponder.

Authors:  Pankaj Kumar Garg; Debajyoti Mohanty
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Quality of reporting statistics in two Indian pharmacology journals.

Authors:  Preeti Yadav
Journal:  J Pharmacol Pharmacother       Date:  2011-04

3.  Suggested statistical reporting guidelines for clinical trials data.

Authors:  Jaykaran Charan; Deepak Saxena
Journal:  Indian J Psychol Med       Date:  2012-01

Review 4.  Guidelines for the measurement of vascular function and structure in isolated arteries and veins.

Authors:  Camilla F Wenceslau; Cameron G McCarthy; Scott Earley; Sarah K England; Jessica A Filosa; Styliani Goulopoulou; David D Gutterman; Brant E Isakson; Nancy L Kanagy; Luis A Martinez-Lemus; Swapnil K Sonkusare; Pratish Thakore; Aaron J Trask; Stephanie W Watts; R Clinton Webb
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 5.125

5.  Verification of Psychophysiological Effects of Satoyama Activities on Older Adult Volunteers and Young People in Post-COVID-19 Society: A Case Study of Matsudo City, Japan.

Authors:  Qiongying Xiang; Zhengwei Yuan; Katsunori Furuya; Takahide Kagawa
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Basic biostatistics for post-graduate students.

Authors:  Ganesh N Dakhale; Sachin K Hiware; Abhijit T Shinde; Mohini S Mahatme
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.200

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.