Literature DB >> 2120663

Peer review and quality management: are they compatible?

D M Berwick1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1990        PMID： 2120663     DOI： 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30377-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull        ISSN： 0097-5990


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  A model for continuous quality improvement in small scale practices.

Authors:  H Geboers; R Grol; W van den Bosch; H van den Hoogen; H Mokkink; P van Montfort; H Oltheten
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-03

2.  External monitoring of quality of health care in the United States.

Authors:  N J Wareham
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-06

3.  Quality management in the NHS: the doctor's role--I.

Authors:  D M Berwick; A Enthoven; J P Bunker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-01-25

4.  Quality management in the NHS: the doctor's role--II.

Authors:  D M Berwick; A Enthoven; J P Bunker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-02-01

5.  Is There a Relationship Between Facility Peer Review Findings and Quality in the Veterans Health Administration?

Authors:  Kathryn M Ryder; Megan K Carey; Yuri N Walker; Ronald I Shorr
Journal:  Fed Pract       Date:  2022-05-13

6.  A case for revisiting peer review: Implications for professional self-regulation and quality improvement.

Authors:  Terry E Hill; Peter F Martelli; Julie H Kuo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.