| Literature DB >> 21206619 |
Imrana Tabassum1, Zeba N Siddiqui, Shamim J Rizvi.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to study the ameliorative effects of Ocimum sanctum and Camellia sinensis on stress-induced anxiety and depression.Entities:
Keywords: Anxiety; Camellia sinensis; Ocimum sanctum; depression; restraint stress
Year: 2010 PMID: 21206619 PMCID: PMC2959210 DOI: 10.4103/0253-7613.70108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Pharmacol ISSN: 0253-7613 Impact factor: 1.200
Effect of O. sanctum and C. sinensis in elevated plus-maze test (EPM)
| Control | 25.2 ± 3.4 | 17.3 ± 3.6 |
| RS | 12.5 ± 4.3 | 6.4 ± 2.4 |
| RS + OS | 27.4 ± 2.0 | 18.5 ± 2.8 |
| OS | 26.7 ± 2.4 | 20.4 ± 2.6 |
| RS + CS | 20.3 ± 3.1 | 13.6 ± 3.2 |
| CS | 22.3 ± 3.6 | 15.4 ± 1.4 |
Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6);
P < 0.05. Statistically significant as compared to control group;
P < 0.01. Statistically significant as compared to RS group.
P < 0.05
Effect of O. sanctum and C. sinensis in open field test
| Control | 2.5 ± 0.7 | 52.7 ± 5.2 | 25.2 ± 2.5 |
| RS | 4.8 ± 0.3 | 32.6 ± 4.6 | 10.4 ± 1.3 |
| RS + OS | 2.3 ± 0.5 | 55.4 ± 3.1 | 28.7 ± 3.0 |
| OS | 2.7 ± 0.4 | 53.6 ± 2.8 | 26.4 ± 2.2 |
| RS + CS | 3.6 ± 0.2 | 48.6 ± 4.2 | 20.3 ± 1.9 |
| CS | 2.8 ± 0.3 | 53.8 ± 3.6 | 27.6 ± 3.2 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6);
P < 0.05. Statistically significant as compared to control group;
P < 0.05
P < 0.01. Statistically significant as compared to RS group.
Effect of O. sanctum and C. sinensis on immobility period of R. norvegicus using tail suspension test (TST)
| Control | 80.73 ± 7.3 |
| RS | 150.64 ± 4.1 |
| RS + OS | 78.84 ± 5.7 |
| OS | 82.36 ± 6.4 |
| RS + CS | 90.34 ± 6.7 |
| CS | 85.72 ± 4.6 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6);
P < 0.001. Statistically significant as compared to control group;
P < 0.05. Statistically significant as compared to RS group.
Effect of O. sanctum and C. sinensis on immobility period of R. norvegicus using forced swim test
| Control | 60.83±12.4 |
| RS | 130.5±15.2 |
| RS + OS | 55.62±10.4 |
| OS | 58.73±9.2 |
| RS + CS | 66.73±10.2 |
| CS | 63.21±11.5 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6);
P < 0.001. Statistically significant as compared to control group;
P < 0.05. Statistically significant as compared to RS group.
Figure 1A rat in a wire mesh restrainer.
Figure 2Bar diagram showing the alteration of % open arm entries and % time spent in EPM following restraint stress (3h/day for 6 days) and ameliorative action of O. sanctum and C. sinensis (100 mg/kg/day for 6 days) on Rattus norvegicus.
Figure 3Bar diagram showing the alteration of latency, ambulation, and rearing in OFT following restraint stress (3 h/day for six consecutive days) and ameliorative action of O. sanctum and C. sinensis (100 mg/kg/day for 6 days) on R. norvegicus.
Figure 4Bar diagram showing the alteration of immobility time in FST following restraint stress (3 h/day for six consecutive days) and ameliorative action of O. sanctum and C. sinensis (100 mg/kg/day for 6 days) on R. norvegicus.
Figure 5Bar diagram showing the alteration of immobility time in TST following restraint stress (3h/day for 6 days) and ameliorative action of O. sanctum and C. sinensis (100 mg/kg/day for 6 days) on Rattus norvegicus.