Literature DB >> 21206478

The use of drip flow and rotating disk reactors for Staphylococcus aureus biofilm analysis.

Kelly Schwartz1, Rachel Stephenson, Margarita Hernandez, Nicolays Jambang, Blaise R Boles.   

Abstract

Most microbes in nature are thought to exist as surface-associated communities in biofilms.(1) Bacterial biofilms are encased within a matrix and attached to a surface.(2) Biofilm formation and development are commonly studied in the laboratory using batch systems such as microtiter plates or flow systems, such as flow-cells. These methodologies are useful for screening mutant and chemical libraries (microtiter plates)(3) or growing biofilms for visualization (flow cells)(4). Here we present detailed protocols for growing Staphylococcus aureus in two additional types of flow system biofilms: the drip flow biofilm reactor and the rotating disk biofilm reactor. Drip flow biofilm reactors are designed for the study of biofilms grown under low shear conditions.(5) The drip flow reactor consists of four parallel test channels, each capable of holding one standard glass microscope slide sized coupon, or a length of catheter or stint. The drip flow reactor is ideal for microsensor monitoring, general biofilm studies, biofilm cryosectioning samples, high biomass production, medical material evaluations, and indwelling medical device testing.(6,7,8,9) The rotating disk reactor consists of a teflon disk containing recesses for removable coupons.(10) The removable coupons can by made from any machinable material. The bottom of the rotating disk contains a bar magnet to allow disk rotation to create liquid surface shear across surface-flush coupons. The entire disk containing 18 coupons is placed in a 1000 mL glass side-arm reactor vessel. A liquid growth media is circulated through the vessel while the disk is rotated by a magnetic stirrer. The coupons are removed from the reactor vessel and then scraped to collect the biofilm sample for further study or microscopy imaging. Rotating disc reactors are designed for laboratory evaluations of biocide efficacy, biofilm removal, and performance of anti-fouling materials.(9,11,12,13).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21206478      PMCID: PMC3329798          DOI: 10.3791/2470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  13 in total

1.  Biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  Karen D Xu; Gordon A McFeters; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.777

2.  A repeatable laboratory method for testing the efficacy of biocides against toilet bowl biofilms.

Authors:  B Pitts; A Willse; G A McFeters; M A Hamilton; N Zelver; P S Stewart
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.772

3.  Self-generated diversity produces "insurance effects" in biofilm communities.

Authors:  Blaise R Boles; Matthew Thoendel; Pradeep K Singh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Rhamnolipids mediate detachment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from biofilms.

Authors:  Blaise R Boles; Matthew Thoendel; Pradeep K Singh
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 5.  Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease.

Authors:  J W Costerton; K J Cheng; G G Geesey; T I Ladd; J C Nickel; M Dasgupta; T J Marrie
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 15.500

Review 6.  Microbial biofilms.

Authors:  J W Costerton; Z Lewandowski; D E Caldwell; D R Korber; H M Lappin-Scott
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 15.500

7.  Alginate overproduction affects Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm structure and function.

Authors:  M Hentzer; G M Teitzel; G J Balzer; A Heydorn; S Molin; M Givskov; M R Parsek
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Use of merocyanine 540 for photodynamic inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus planktonic and biofilm cells.

Authors:  Hsiao-Yin Lin; Chin-Tin Chen; Ching-Tsan Huang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Bacteriophage cocktail for the prevention of biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa on catheters in an in vitro model system.

Authors:  Weiling Fu; Terri Forster; Oren Mayer; John J Curtin; Susan M Lehman; Rodney M Donlan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Initiation of biofilm formation in Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365 proceeds via multiple, convergent signalling pathways: a genetic analysis.

Authors:  G A O'Toole; R Kolter
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.501

View more
  17 in total

1.  Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment Methods for Biofilm Growth: A Mini-review.

Authors:  Christina Wilson; Rachel Lukowicz; Stefan Merchant; Helena Valquier-Flynn; Jeniffer Caballero; Jasmin Sandoval; Macduff Okuom; Christopher Huber; Tessa Durham Brooks; Erin Wilson; Barbara Clement; Christopher D Wentworth; Andrea E Holmes
Journal:  Res Rev J Eng Technol       Date:  2017-10-24

2.  Role of the nuclease of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae in dispersal of organisms from biofilms.

Authors:  Christine Cho; Aroon Chande; Lokesh Gakhar; Lauren O Bakaletz; Joseph A Jurcisek; Margaret Ketterer; Jian Shao; Kenji Gotoh; Eric Foster; Jason Hunt; Erin O'Brien; Michael A Apicella
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Live Cell Analysis of Shear Stress on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using an Automated Higher-Throughput Microfluidic System.

Authors:  Arin L Sutlief; Helena Valquier-Flynn; Christina Wilson; Marco Perez; Hunter Kleinschmidt; Brett J Schofield; Elizabeth Delmain; Andrea E Holmes; Christopher D Wentworth
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 4.  Options and Limitations in Clinical Investigation of Bacterial Biofilms.

Authors:  Maria Magana; Christina Sereti; Anastasios Ioannidis; Courtney A Mitchell; Anthony R Ball; Emmanouil Magiorkinis; Stylianos Chatzipanagiotou; Michael R Hamblin; Maria Hadjifrangiskou; George P Tegos
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  The AgrD N-terminal leader peptide of Staphylococcus aureus has cytolytic and amyloidogenic properties.

Authors:  Kelly Schwartz; Matthew D Sekedat; Adnan K Syed; Brendan O'Hara; David E Payne; Abigail Lamb; Blaise R Boles
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 6.  PK/PD models in antibacterial development.

Authors:  Tony Velkov; Phillip J Bergen; Jaime Lora-Tamayo; Cornelia B Landersdorfer; Jian Li
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 7.934

7.  Extracellular DNA facilitates the formation of functional amyloids in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.

Authors:  Kelly Schwartz; Mahesh Ganesan; David E Payne; Michael J Solomon; Blaise R Boles
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.501

8.  Involvement of Chromosomally Encoded Homologs of the RRNPP Protein Family in Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm Formation and Urinary Tract Infection Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Srivatsan Parthasarathy; Lorne D Jordan; Nancy Schwarting; Megan A Woods; Zakria Abdullahi; Sriram Varahan; Patricia M S Passos; Brandy Miller; Lynn E Hancock
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Influence of the Alternative Sigma Factor RpoN on Global Gene Expression and Carbon Catabolism in Enterococcus faecalis V583.

Authors:  Erica C Keffeler; Vijayalakshmi S Iyer; Srivatsan Parthasarathy; Matthew M Ramsey; Matthew J Gorman; Theresa L Barke; Sriram Varahan; Sally Olson; Michael S Gilmore; Zakria H Abdullahi; Emmaleigh N Hancock; Lynn E Hancock
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 7.867

10.  Functional amyloids composed of phenol soluble modulins stabilize Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.

Authors:  Kelly Schwartz; Adnan K Syed; Rachel E Stephenson; Alexander H Rickard; Blaise R Boles
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 6.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.