Literature DB >> 21206239

BRCA1/2 germline mutations in Jewish patients with uterine serous carcinoma.

Ilan Bruchim1, Keren Amichay, Dvora Kidron, Zohar Attias, Tal Biron-Shental, Liat Drucker, Eitan Friedman, Haim Werner, Ami Fishman.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Whether and to what extent germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes increase the risk for developing uterine serous carcinoma (USC) remain controversial. We assessed the rate of the 3 predominant BRCA1/2 mutations in Jewish patients with USC and the relevance of carrier status to clinicopathological features and survival.
METHODS: Jewish patients with histologically confirmed USC diagnosed between April 1997 and December 2007 were genotyped for the 3 predominant BRCA1 (185delAG and 5382insC) and BRCA2 (6174delT) mutations. Clinical characteristics were abstracted from the patients' medical records. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used for survival analyses.
RESULTS: Overall, 8 (25.8%) of 31 Jewish patients with USC who participated in the study were mutation carriers: 4 were BRCA2 (6174delT) carriers and 2 each carried the BRCA1 mutations (185delAG and 5382insC). The median ages of the carriers and the noncarriers were 66 and 74 years, respectively (P = 0.124). Four (50%) of the mutation carriers and 2 (8%) of the noncarriers had a family history of breast-ovarian cancer (P = 0.026). With a median follow-up of 76 months, the overall median survival time was 25 months. No significant differences in the median survival time, 2-year survival, or progression-free survival were noted between the mutation carriers and the noncarriers.
CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of the predominant BRCA1/2 mutations in unselected Jewish USC patients, if confirmed by future studies, suggests that USC could be considered an expression of the hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21206239     DOI: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181ef622d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  11 in total

1.  Uterine serous carcinoma: increased familial risk for lynch-associated malignancies.

Authors:  Summer B Dewdney; Nora T Kizer; Abegail A Andaya; Sheri A Babb; Jingqin Luo; David G Mutch; Amy P Schmidt; Louise A Brinton; Russell R Broaddus; Nilsa C Ramirez; Phyllis C Huettner; Donald Scott McMeekin; Kathleen Darcy; Shamshad Ali; Patricia L Judson; Robert S Mannel; Shashikant B Lele; David M O'Malley; Paul J Goodfellow
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2012-01-13

Review 2.  Müllerian intra-abdominal carcinomatosis in hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome: implications for risk-reducing surgery.

Authors:  Murray Joseph Casey; Agnes B Colanta
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 3.  Endometrial cancer gene panels: clinical diagnostic vs research germline DNA testing.

Authors:  Amanda B Spurdle; Michael A Bowman; Jannah Shamsani; Judy Kirk
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Phenotypic heterogeneity of hereditary gynecologic cancers: a report from the Creighton hereditary cancer registry.

Authors:  Murray Joseph Casey; Chhanda Bewtra; Henry T Lynch; Carrie Snyder; Mark Stacy; Patrice Watson
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 5.  Hereditary Syndromes Manifesting as Endometrial Carcinoma: How Can Pathological Features Aid Risk Assessment?

Authors:  Adele Wong; Joanne Ngeow
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  The IGF Hormonal Network in Endometrial Cancer: Functions, Regulation, and Targeting Approaches.

Authors:  Ilan Bruchim; Rive Sarfstein; Haim Werner
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 5.555

7.  The Role of the Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 Pathway in Immune Tumor Microenvironment and Its Clinical Ramifications in Gynecologic Malignancies.

Authors:  Muna Alemi Yahya; Shilhav Meisel Sharon; Shay Hantisteanu; Mordechai Hallak; Ilan Bruchim
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 8.  BRCA1: An Endocrine and Metabolic Regulator.

Authors:  Haim Werner
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  Uterine Cancer After Risk-Reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy Without Hysterectomy in Women With BRCA Mutations.

Authors:  Catherine A Shu; Malcolm C Pike; Anjali R Jotwani; Tara M Friebel; Robert A Soslow; Douglas A Levine; Katherine L Nathanson; Jason A Konner; Angela G Arnold; Faina Bogomolniy; Fanny Dao; Narciso Olvera; Elizabeth K Bancroft; Deborah J Goldfrank; Zsofia K Stadler; Mark E Robson; Carol L Brown; Mario M Leitao; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Carol A Aghajanian; Joanne L Blum; Susan L Neuhausen; Judy E Garber; Mary B Daly; Claudine Isaacs; Rosalind A Eeles; Patricia A Ganz; Richard R Barakat; Kenneth Offit; Susan M Domchek; Timothy R Rebbeck; Noah D Kauff
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 31.777

10.  Hysterectomy at the time of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA carriers.

Authors:  Navya Nair; Melissa Schwartz; Lisa Guzzardi; Nicki Durlester; Stephanie Pan; Jessica Overbey; Linus Chuang
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-10-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.