BACKGROUND: The prevalence of diabetes in women of childbearing age is increasing. As such, the number of pregnancies complicated by diabetes will inevitably increase. New insulin analogues such as the long-acting analogue insulin glargine may represent beneficial treatment options in pregnancy by ensuring that patients achieve excellent glycemic control without risk of maternal hypoglycemia. OBJECTIVE: To determine the fetal safety of insulin glargine use in the treatment of diabetes in pregnancy compared with NPH insulin therapy. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed of all original human studies that reported neonatal outcomes among women with pregestational or gestational diabetes who were managed with either insulin glargine or NPH insulin during pregnancy. A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials database, and Web of Science from 1980 to June 1, 2010. Outcomes included large size for gestational age, macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, birth trauma, congenital anomalies, preterm delivery, perinatal mortality, respiratory distress, and hyperbilirubinemia. Relative risk ratios and weighted mean differences were computed with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Eight studies reporting on a total of 702 women with pregestational or gestational diabetes in pregnancy treated with either insulin glargine (n = 331) or NPH insulin (n = 371) met the inclusion criteria. There were no statistically significant differences in the occurrence of fetal outcomes studied with the use of insulin glargine compared to NPH insulin. CONCLUSIONS: No evidence has been documented for increased adverse fetal outcomes with the use of insulin glargine in pregnancy compared to the use of NPH insulin. These results increase the choices for women requiring basal insulin therapy in pregnancy.
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of diabetes in women of childbearing age is increasing. As such, the number of pregnancies complicated by diabetes will inevitably increase. New insulin analogues such as the long-acting analogue insulinglargine may represent beneficial treatment options in pregnancy by ensuring that patients achieve excellent glycemic control without risk of maternal hypoglycemia. OBJECTIVE: To determine the fetal safety of insulinglargine use in the treatment of diabetes in pregnancy compared with NPH insulin therapy. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed of all original human studies that reported neonatal outcomes among women with pregestational or gestational diabetes who were managed with either insulin glargine or NPH insulin during pregnancy. A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials database, and Web of Science from 1980 to June 1, 2010. Outcomes included large size for gestational age, macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, birth trauma, congenital anomalies, preterm delivery, perinatal mortality, respiratory distress, and hyperbilirubinemia. Relative risk ratios and weighted mean differences were computed with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Eight studies reporting on a total of 702 women with pregestational or gestational diabetes in pregnancy treated with either insulinglargine (n = 331) or NPH insulin (n = 371) met the inclusion criteria. There were no statistically significant differences in the occurrence of fetal outcomes studied with the use of insulinglargine compared to NPH insulin. CONCLUSIONS: No evidence has been documented for increased adverse fetal outcomes with the use of insulinglargine in pregnancy compared to the use of NPH insulin. These results increase the choices for women requiring basal insulin therapy in pregnancy.
Authors: Jacques Lepercq; Jay Lin; Gillian C Hall; Edward Wang; Marie-Paule Dain; Matthew C Riddle; Philip D Home Journal: Obstet Gynecol Int Date: 2012-05-16