Literature DB >> 21205565

Danish general practitioners only play a minor role in the coordination of cancer treatment.

Rikke Juul Dalsted1, Ann Dorrit Guassora, Thorkil Thorsen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite initiatives to integrate treatment and care across organisations, patient trajectories in Danish health-care are not well coordinated. Coordination among many health-care professionals is essential, and it is frequently suggested that a single person should perform the task of coordination. The aim of the article is to discuss whether general practitioners (GPs) may play a coordinating role for individual patients in Danish cancer treatment.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study is based on individual interviews and focus groups analyzed by meaning condensation.
RESULTS: The GP's potential to coordinate patient trajectories was limited by lack of involvement of the GPs by other health-care professionals and lack of needed information. Furthermore, many patients do not regard their GP as a coordinator. Patients who contacted their GP during treatment typically had a close relationship with their GP prior to their cancer diagnosis. In cases with a more distant relationship, patients did not see a need for the GP's involvement. The majority of patients' trajectories were decided within hospitals. The level of information provided to GPs varied much between hospitals and wards. In the majority of cases, GPs had no access to information or were not informed about hospital decisions affecting the patients' trajectories, and they were therefore unable to perform a coordinating role.
CONCLUSION: GPs only played a minor or no role at all as coordinators of individual cancer patient trajectories. The findings of the present study question the idea that coordination throughout the entire health-care system may be assigned to a single individual as the involved parties belong to different organizations with different goals, managements and economic resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21205565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dan Med Bull        ISSN: 0907-8916


  5 in total

1.  Involvement of general practitioners in palliative cancer care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Anne Dahlhaus; Nicholas Vanneman; Andrea Siebenhofer; Marie Brosche; Corina Guethlin
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  The role of the GP in follow-up cancer care: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Judith A Meiklejohn; Alexander Mimery; Jennifer H Martin; Ross Bailie; Gail Garvey; Euan T Walpole; Jon Adams; Daniel Williamson; Patricia C Valery
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Preparing general practitioners to receive cancer patients following treatment in secondary care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ann Dorrit Guassora; Lene Jarlbaek; Thorkil Thorsen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Healthcare practices that increase the quality of care in cancer trajectories from a general practice perspective: a scoping review.

Authors:  Anne Nicolaisen; Gitte Bruun Lauridsen; Peter Haastrup; Dorte Gilså Hansen; Dorte Ejg Jarbøl
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.147

5.  Use of general practice, diagnostic investigations and hospital services before and after cancer diagnosis - a population-based nationwide registry study of 127,000 incident adult cancer patients.

Authors:  Karina Garnier Christensen; Morten Fenger-Grøn; Kaare Rud Flarup; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.