Literature DB >> 21205563

Few complications after paracentesis in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites.

Signe Skovgaard Wiese1, Christian Mortensen, Flemming Bendtsen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The relevance of needle type and ultrasound guidance in connection with complications and technical problems in paracentesis in cirrhotic patients has only been sparsely described. The aim of this study was to evaluate paracentesis in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites, focusing on technique, complications, amount of ascites drained and prognosis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study based on 51 cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites undergoing paracentesis. A total of 209 paracenteses were performed using a pigtail catheter and an intravenous catheter. Ultrasound-guided puncture or no ultrasound-guided punctured were compared with regard to amount of drained ascites, technical problems and complications both immediate and within a week of the procedure. The impact of coagulopathy was also investigated.
RESULTS: 12% immediate and 5% late complications occurred, most of which were minor. No significant differences in the frequency of complications were found when comparing a pigtail to an intravenous catheter (8% versus 21%, OR = 2.81 95% CI (0.86; 9.13)), nor did the amount of drained ascites differ significantly. Ultrasound guidance did not significantly decrease the frequency of complications (7% versus 9%, OR 1.34 95% CI (0.37; 4.84)). Coagulopathy did not significantly affect the risk of complications.
CONCLUSION: Paracentesis in patients with cirrhosis is associated with a low frequency of serious complications, regardless of the technique deployed. Although the material is of limited size, it appears that coagulopathy does not increase the risk of complications following this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21205563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dan Med Bull        ISSN: 0907-8916


  4 in total

1.  Establishing an indwelling peritoneal catheter as a standard procedure for hospitalized patients with ascites: Retrospective data on feasibility, effectiveness and safety.

Authors:  Katharina Stratmann; Daniel Fitting; Stefan Zeuzem; Jörg Bojunga; Jonel Trebicka; Mireen Friedrich-Rust; Georg Dultz
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Recommendations on the Use of Ultrasound Guidance for Adult Abdominal Paracentesis: A Position Statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine.

Authors:  Joel Cho; Trevor P Jensen; Kreegan Reierson; Benji K Mathews; Anjali Bhagra; Ricardo Franco-Sadud; Loretta Grikis; Michael Mader; Ria Dancel; Brian P Lucas; Nilam J Soni
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.960

3.  Ultrasound Findings in Suspected Ascites Referred for Paracentesis.

Authors:  Jan Christian Droste; Christy Riggott; Tracey Maxfield; Jodie Bennett
Journal:  J Med Ultrasound       Date:  2021-06-16

4.  Does Point-of-Care Ultrasound Change the Needle Insertion Location During Routine Bedside Paracentesis?

Authors:  David M Rodrigues; Arjun Kundra; Lawrence Hookey; Steven Montague
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 6.473

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.