Literature DB >> 2120475

Changes in sickness at admission following the introduction of the prospective payment system.

E B Keeler1, K L Kahn, D Draper, M J Sherwood, L V Rubenstein, E J Reinisch, J Kosecoff, R H Brook.   

Abstract

We developed disease-specific measures of sickness at admission based on medical record data to study mortality of Medicare patients with one of five conditions (congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, pneumonia, and hip fracture). We collected an average of 73 sickness variables per disease, but our final sickness-at-admission scales use, on average, 19 variables. These scales are publicly available, and explain 25% of the variance in 30-day postadmission mortality for patients with acute myocardial infarction, pneumonia, or cerebrovascular accident. Sickness at admission increased following the introduction of the prospective payment system (PPS). For our five diseases combined, the 30-day mortality to be expected because of sickness at admission was 1.0% higher in the 1985-1986 period than in the 1981-1982 period (16.4% vs 15.4%), and the expected 180-day mortality was 1.6% higher (30.1% vs 28.5%). Studies of the effects of PPS on mortality must take this increase in sickness at admission into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2120475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  25 in total

1.  Practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  J G Bartlett; S F Dowell; L A Mandell; T M File; D M Musher; M J Fine
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2000-09-07       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 2.  An economic analysis of money follows the patient.

Authors:  B McElroy; A Murphy
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Is use of mechanical ventilation a reasonable proxy indicator for coma among Medicare patients hospitalized for acute stroke?

Authors:  R D Horner; R J Sloane; K L Kahn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Pressure-redistributing support surface use and pressure ulcer incidence in elderly hip fracture patients.

Authors:  Shayna E Rich; Michelle Shardell; William G Hawkes; David J Margolis; Sania Amr; Ram Miller; Mona Baumgarten
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  The effect of alternative case-mix adjustments on mortality differences between municipal and voluntary hospitals in New York City.

Authors:  M F Shapiro; R E Park; J Keesey; R H Brook
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  An overview of nosocomial infections, including the role of the microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  T G Emori; R P Gaynes
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Comparison of a disease-specific and a generic severity of illness measure for patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  M J Fine; B H Hanusa; J R Lave; D E Singer; R A Stone; L A Weissfeld; C M Coley; T J Marrie; W N Kapoor
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Effect of correcting outcome data for case mix: an example from stroke medicine.

Authors:  R J Davenport; M S Dennis; C P Warlow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-06-15

9.  Physical therapy and mobility 2 and 6 months after hip fracture.

Authors:  Joan D Penrod; Kenneth S Boockvar; Ann Litke; Jay Magaziner; Edward L Hannan; Ethan A Halm; Stacey B Silberzweig; R Sean Morrison; Gretchen M Orosz; Kenneth J Koval; Albert L Siu
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Comorbidity risk-adjustment strategies are comparable among persons with hip fracture.

Authors:  David C Radley; Daniel J Gottlieb; Elliot S Fisher; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 6.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.