Literature DB >> 21204713

Molecular testing of solid tumors.

Anne Igbokwe1, Dolores H Lopez-Terrada.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Molecular testing of solid tumors is steadily becoming a vital component of the contemporary anatomic pathologist's armamentarium. These sensitive and specific ancillary tools are useful for confirming ambiguous diagnoses suspected by light microscopy and for guiding therapeutic decisions, assessing prognosis, and monitoring patients for residual neoplastic disease after therapy.
OBJECTIVE: To review current molecular biomarkers and tumor-specific assays most useful in solid tumor testing, specifically of breast, colon, lung, thyroid, and soft tissue tumors, malignant melanoma, and tumors of unknown origin. A few upcoming molecular diagnostic assays that may become standard of care in the near future will also be discussed. DATA SOURCES: Original research articles, review articles, and the authors' personal practice experience.
CONCLUSIONS: Molecular testing in anatomic pathology is firmly established and will continue to gain ground as the need for more specific diagnoses and new targeted therapies evolve. Knowledge of the more common and clinically relevant molecular tests available for solid tumor diagnosis and management, and their indications and limitations, is necessary if anatomic pathologists are to optimally use these tests and act as consultants for fellow clinicians directly involved in patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21204713     DOI: 10.5858/2010-0413-RAR.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  8 in total

Review 1.  Mass spectrometry imaging to detect lipid biomarkers and disease signatures in cancer.

Authors:  Matthias Holzlechner; Eliseo Eugenin; Brendan Prideaux
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-12

Review 2.  Molecular pathology.

Authors:  Stanley R Hamilton
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  Utilization of genetic tests: analysis of gene-specific billing in Medicare claims data.

Authors:  Julie A Lynch; Brygida Berse; W David Dotson; Muin J Khoury; Nicole Coomer; John Kautter
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 4.  Not All Next Generation Sequencing Diagnostics are Created Equal: Understanding the Nuances of Solid Tumor Assay Design for Somatic Mutation Detection.

Authors:  Phillip N Gray; Charles L M Dunlop; Aaron M Elliott
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 5.  When diagnostic testing leads to harm: a new outcomes-based approach for laboratory medicine.

Authors:  Paul L Epner; Janet E Gans; Mark L Graber
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 7.035

6.  Impact of COVID-19 on quality checks of solid tumor molecular diagnostic testing-A surveillance by EQAS provider in India.

Authors:  Omshree Shetty; Tanuja Shet; Ramya Iyer; Prachi Gogte; Mamta Gurav; Pradnya Joshi; Nupur Karnik; Trupti Pai; Sridhar Epari; Sangeeta Desai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Comparison of histopathology to gene expression profiling for the diagnosis of metastatic cancer.

Authors:  Anand Kulkarni; Raji Pillai; Ashley M Ezekiel; W David Henner; Charles R Handorf
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.644

8.  TumorNext: A comprehensive tumor profiling assay that incorporates high resolution copy number analysis and germline status to improve testing accuracy.

Authors:  Phillip N Gray; Huy Vuong; Pei Tsai; Hsaio-Mei Lu; Wenbo Mu; Vickie Hsuan; Jayne Hoo; Swati Shah; Lisa Uyeda; Susanne Fox; Harshil Patel; Mike Janicek; Sandra Brown; Lavinia Dobrea; Lawrence Wagman; Elizabeth Plimack; Ranee Mehra; Erica A Golemis; Marijo Bilusic; Matthew Zibelman; Aaron Elliott
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-10-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.