PURPOSE: This study used a dog model to determine the optimal temperature of percutaneous microwave ablation that causes complete necrosis of liver but not the adjacent bowel, supporting the use of this method to specifically and effectively treat liver tumour abutting the bowel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of liver abutting the bowel was performed on healthy adult dogs. Temperature of the ablation margin was monitored and controlled through inserted thermal monitoring needles. Dogs were divided into three groups and received microwave ablation at 75-95°C, 65-75°C, or 55-65°C. Imaging and histological examination were used to evaluate the damage of the bowel adjacent to the ablated liver. RESULTS: Within one hour of treatment, the bowel adjacent to the ablated liver was seriously burned in the group receiving 75-95°C microwave ablation. Inflammation and congestion were found in the submucosa of the bowel in the group receiving 65-75°C microwave ablation. Minor inflammation was found in the mucosa of the bowel in the group receiving 55-65°C microwave ablation. Moreover, in the group receiving 55-65°C microwave ablation, ablated liver areas were covered with omenta, and histological examination revealed inflammatory reaction of the omenta 28 days after ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Microwave ablation at 55-65°C for 6 min is preferred for ablation of liver tissue abutting the bowel in dogs. These findings may provide some valuable reference for percutaneous microwave ablation of human liver tumour adjacent to the bowel.
PURPOSE: This study used a dog model to determine the optimal temperature of percutaneous microwave ablation that causes complete necrosis of liver but not the adjacent bowel, supporting the use of this method to specifically and effectively treat liver tumour abutting the bowel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of liver abutting the bowel was performed on healthy adult dogs. Temperature of the ablation margin was monitored and controlled through inserted thermal monitoring needles. Dogs were divided into three groups and received microwave ablation at 75-95°C, 65-75°C, or 55-65°C. Imaging and histological examination were used to evaluate the damage of the bowel adjacent to the ablated liver. RESULTS: Within one hour of treatment, the bowel adjacent to the ablated liver was seriously burned in the group receiving 75-95°C microwave ablation. Inflammation and congestion were found in the submucosa of the bowel in the group receiving 65-75°C microwave ablation. Minor inflammation was found in the mucosa of the bowel in the group receiving 55-65°C microwave ablation. Moreover, in the group receiving 55-65°C microwave ablation, ablated liver areas were covered with omenta, and histological examination revealed inflammatory reaction of the omenta 28 days after ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Microwave ablation at 55-65°C for 6 min is preferred for ablation of liver tissue abutting the bowel in dogs. These findings may provide some valuable reference for percutaneous microwave ablation of humanliver tumour adjacent to the bowel.