Literature DB >> 21203856

Objective assessment of operator performance during ultrasound-guided procedures.

David M Tabriz1, Mandie Street, Thomas K Pilgram, James R Duncan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Simulation permits objective assessment of operator performance in a controlled and safe environment. Image-guided procedures often require accurate needle placement, and we designed a system to monitor how ultrasound guidance is used to monitor needle advancement toward a target. The results were correlated with other estimates of operator skill.
METHODS: The simulator consisted of a tissue phantom, ultrasound unit, and electromagnetic tracking system. Operators were asked to guide a needle toward a visible point target. Performance was video-recorded and synchronized with the electromagnetic tracking data. A series of algorithms based on motor control theory and human information processing were used to convert raw tracking data into different performance indices. Scoring algorithms converted the tracking data into efficiency, quality, task difficulty, and targeting scores that were aggregated to create performance indices. After initial feasibility testing, a standardized assessment was developed. Operators (N = 12) with a broad spectrum of skill and experience were enrolled and tested. Overall scores were based on performance during ten simulated procedures. Prior clinical experience was used to independently estimate operator skill.
RESULTS: When summed, the performance indices correlated well with estimated skill. Operators with minimal or no prior experience scored markedly lower than experienced operators. The overall score tended to increase according to operator's clinical experience. Operator experience was linked to decreased variation in multiple aspects of performance. The aggregated results of multiple trials provided the best correlation between estimated skill and performance. A metric for the operator's ability to maintain the needle aimed at the target discriminated between operators with different levels of experience.
CONCLUSIONS: This study used a highly focused task model, standardized assessment, and objective data analysis to assess performance during simulated ultrasound-guided needle placement. The performance indices were closely related to operator experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21203856     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-010-0541-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  16 in total

1.  The power law repealed: the case for an exponential law of practice.

Authors:  A Heathcote; S Brown; D J Mewhort
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-06

2.  Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time.

Authors:  R HYMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-03

Review 3.  Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains.

Authors:  K Anders Ericsson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Analysis of simulated angiographic procedures: part 1--capture and presentation of audio and video recordings.

Authors:  James R Duncan; Craig B Glaiberman
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  Ultrasound-guided central venous access: a homemade phantom for simulation.

Authors:  John L Kendall; Jeffrey P Faragher
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.410

Review 6.  Procedural simulation: a primer.

Authors:  Steven Dawson
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Simulation devices in interventional radiology: validation pending.

Authors:  Derek A Gould; Jim A Reekers; David O Kessel; Nick C Chalmers; Marc Sapoval; Aalpen A Patel; Gary J Becker; Mick J Lee; Luc Stockx
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  Capture and analysis of data from image-guided procedures.

Authors:  Elio Beta; Ashesh S Parikh; Mandie Street; James R Duncan
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  Assessing system performance.

Authors:  Eleanor I Bucholz; James R Duncan
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.464

10.  Beyond "see one, do one, teach one": toward a different training paradigm.

Authors:  J M Rodriguez-Paz; M Kennedy; E Salas; A W Wu; J B Sexton; E A Hunt; P J Pronovost
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2009-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  Wanted: automated objective proficiency assessment metrics for the FAST exam (and other POCUS studies).

Authors:  Colin R Bell; Matthew S Holden
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Interventional radiology virtual simulator for liver biopsy.

Authors:  P F Villard; F P Vidal; L ap Cenydd; R Holbrey; S Pisharody; S Johnson; A Bulpitt; N W John; F Bello; D Gould
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 3.  Improving Performance During Image-Guided Procedures.

Authors:  James R Duncan; David Tabriz
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.844

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.