Literature DB >> 21203747

Transesophageal echocardiography in prone position during severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Armand Mekontso Dessap1, Olivier Proost, Florence Boissier, Bruno Louis, Ferran Roche Campo, Laurent Brochard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) often require prolonged sessions of prone position (PP) because of refractory hypoxemia. Because of frequent hemodynamic impairment, use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is also advocated during ARDS, but its implementation during PP has not been described yet. Our objective is to report the feasibility, tolerance, and therapeutic implications of TEE during PP for severe ARDS, and to compare it with TEE performed supine.
METHODS: Prospective study in the medical intensive care unit of a university hospital.
RESULTS: A total of 34 patients with ARDS underwent TEE in PP. Probe insertion was successful in all but one patient, and vital signs did not change during insertion. All standard views and measures could be obtained, except for patent foramen ovale in one patient, and cardiac output assessment in four patients. TEE examinations were all conclusive and led to therapeutic change proposal in 23 patients (70%). TEE was performed in both supine and PP in 16 patients within a median delay of 3 days. There was no difference between the two examinations in terms of feasibility, tolerance, therapeutic implication, and image quality. In ten healthy individuals, we also explored the minimal cross-sectional area of the oropharyngeal duct with the acoustic reflection technique; it was found identical in supine and PP.
CONCLUSIONS: TEE can be performed safely and efficiently in severe ARDS patients in PP. PP is not associated with a significant change in the oropharyngeal tract cross-section in healthy individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21203747     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-010-2114-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  15 in total

Review 1.  The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination.

Authors:  G R Bernard; A Artigas; K L Brigham; J Carlet; K Falke; L Hudson; M Lamy; J R Legall; A Morris; R Spragg
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Effects of head rotation on pharyngeal function during normal swallow.

Authors:  Y Ohmae; M Ogura; S Kitahara; T Karaho; T Inouye
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  Gender differences in the expression of sleep-disordered breathing : role of upper airway dimensions.

Authors:  V Mohsenin
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Airway area by acoustic reflection: the two-microphone method.

Authors:  B Louis; G Glass; B Kresen; J Fredberg
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Acute cor pulmonale in acute respiratory distress syndrome submitted to protective ventilation: incidence, clinical implications, and prognosis.

Authors:  A Vieillard-Baron; J M Schmitt; R Augarde; J L Fellahi; S Prin; B Page; A Beauchet; F Jardin
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 6.  Prone ventilation reduces mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure and severe hypoxemia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sachin Sud; Jan O Friedrich; Paolo Taccone; Federico Polli; Neill K J Adhikari; Roberto Latini; Antonio Pesenti; Claude Guérin; Jordi Mancebo; Martha A Q Curley; Rafael Fernandez; Ming-Cheng Chan; Pascal Beuret; Gregor Voggenreiter; Maneesh Sud; Gianni Tognoni; Luciano Gattinoni
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Positive end-expiratory pressure setting in adults with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alain Mercat; Jean-Christophe M Richard; Bruno Vielle; Samir Jaber; David Osman; Jean-Luc Diehl; Jean-Yves Lefrant; Gwenaël Prat; Jack Richecoeur; Ania Nieszkowska; Claude Gervais; Jérôme Baudot; Lila Bouadma; Laurent Brochard
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The frequency of acquisition and quality of images obtained by transesophageal echocardiography: a prospective study of 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  G I Cohen; M B Davison; A L Klein; E E Salcedo; W J Stewart
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.251

9.  Evaluation of density area in dorsal lung region during prone position using transesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  Toshihito Tsubo; Yuichi Yatsu; Takeshi Tanabe; Hirobumi Okawa; Hironori Ishihara; Akitomo Matsuki
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic impact of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU.

Authors:  P Vignon; H Mentec; S Terré; H Gastinne; P Guéret; F Lemaire
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  17 in total

1.  Transoesophageal echocardiography during prone positioning for ARDS: watching the heart to care for the lung.

Authors:  Fabio Guarracino
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Myths about critical care echocardiography: the ten false beliefs that intensivists should understand.

Authors:  Paul Mayo; Armand Mekontso Dessap; Armand Mekontso Dessap; Antoine Vieillard-Baron
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Preventing the development of acute cor pulmonale in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: the first step.

Authors:  Abhishek Biswas
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

4.  Trans-thoracic Echocardiography in Prone Positioning COVID-19 Patients: a Small Case Series.

Authors:  Enrico Giustiniano; Fabio Fazzari; Renato Maria Bragato; Mirko Curzi; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  SN Compr Clin Med       Date:  2020-09-15

Review 5.  The potential role and limitations of echocardiography in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Chiara Lazzeri; Giovanni Cianchi; Manuela Bonizzoli; Stefano Batacchi; Adriano Peris; Gian Franco Gensini
Journal:  Ther Adv Respir Dis       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.031

Review 6.  Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2011. II. Cardiovascular, infections, pneumonia and sepsis, critical care organization and outcome, education, ultrasonography, metabolism and coagulation.

Authors:  Massimo Antonelli; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; J Randall Curtis; Daniel De Backer; Goran Hedenstierna; Michael Joannidis; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Jean-Charles Preiser; Patricia Rocco; Jean-François Timsit; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Right heart failure in acute respiratory distress syndrome: An unappreciated albeit a potential target for intervention in the management of the disease.

Authors:  Abhishek Biswas
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-10

8.  Prone Position Ventilation Used during a Transfer as a Bridge to Ecmo Therapy in Hantavirus-Induced Severe Cardiopulmonary Syndrome.

Authors:  R Cornejo; D Ugalde; O Llanos; P Bisbal; L De la Barrera; C Romero; R Neira; Roberto González; J Gajardo
Journal:  Case Rep Crit Care       Date:  2013-07-15

Review 9.  Critical care ultrasonography in acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  Philippe Vignon; Xavier Repessé; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Eric Maury
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Even Considering the Existing High Technology, Do Not Forget That the Old Stethoscope Is Still a Useful Tool for the Heart Team.

Authors:  Paulo Roberto B Evora; André Schmidt; Domingo M Braile
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018 May-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.