Literature DB >> 21203184

3,5-Dinitro-benzyl methane-sulfonate.

Gul S Khan1, George R Clark, David Barker.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(8)H(8)N(2)O(7)S, an inter-mediate in the synthesis of N,N-bis-(2-hydroxy-ethyl)-3,5-dinitro-aniline, exists as a discrete mol-ecule; the nitro groups are twisted with respect to the aromatic system [dihedral angles = 17.0 (1) and 26.3 (1)°].

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21203184      PMCID: PMC2962102          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808020850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the utility of benzyl methane­sulfonates in synthesis, see: Barker et al. (2008 ▶); Bretonniere et al. (2004 ▶); Oh et al. (2004 ▶); Schirok et al. (2005 ▶). For the incorporation of N,N-bis­(2-hydroxy­ethyl)benzyl­amines in macromolecular metal complexes, see: Crans & Boukhobza (1998 ▶); Koizumi et al. (2005 ▶, 2007 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H8N2O7S M = 276.22 Monoclinic, a = 9.3549 (5) Å b = 8.7552 (5) Å c = 14.1526 (8) Å β = 107.430 (1)° V = 1105.91 (11) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.32 mm−1 T = 89 (1) K 0.32 × 0.14 × 0.14 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1997 ▶) T min = 0.799, T max = 0.971 6374 measured reflections 2233 independent reflections 1959 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.019

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.033 wR(F 2) = 0.088 S = 1.06 2233 reflections 163 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.28 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.49 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1995 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1995 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808020850/ng2470sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808020850/ng2470Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H8N2O7SF000 = 568
Mr = 276.22Dx = 1.659 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 4665 reflections
a = 9.3549 (5) Åθ = 2.3–26.4º
b = 8.7552 (5) ŵ = 0.32 mm1
c = 14.1526 (8) ÅT = 89 (1) K
β = 107.430 (1)ºRod, yellow
V = 1105.91 (11) Å30.32 × 0.14 × 0.14 mm
Z = 4
Bruker SMART diffractometer2233 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1959 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.019
T = 89(1) Kθmax = 26.4º
ω scansθmin = 2.3º
Absorption correction: multi-scan(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1997)h = −9→11
Tmin = 0.799, Tmax = 0.971k = −10→9
6374 measured reflectionsl = −17→8
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.088  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0465P)2 + 0.6248P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.06(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
2233 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.28 e Å3
163 parametersΔρmin = −0.49 e Å3
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction correction: none
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S0.28908 (4)0.49088 (4)0.39904 (3)0.01554 (13)
O10.79782 (14)0.02166 (15)0.65112 (9)0.0229 (3)
O20.75778 (13)−0.16192 (14)0.74420 (9)0.0199 (3)
O30.23786 (14)−0.34566 (14)0.65950 (9)0.0230 (3)
O40.06497 (14)−0.21217 (16)0.55662 (12)0.0343 (4)
O50.31800 (13)0.32888 (13)0.45017 (8)0.0171 (3)
O60.31513 (15)0.60687 (14)0.47320 (9)0.0259 (3)
O70.37522 (14)0.49312 (14)0.33100 (9)0.0223 (3)
N10.71506 (16)−0.05791 (16)0.68364 (10)0.0166 (3)
N20.19482 (16)−0.23139 (16)0.60944 (11)0.0191 (3)
C10.35300 (19)0.15179 (18)0.58246 (11)0.0149 (3)
C20.50631 (18)0.11998 (19)0.61537 (11)0.0155 (3)
H2A0.57610.19570.61550.019*
C30.55267 (18)−0.02626 (19)0.64782 (12)0.0148 (3)
C40.45474 (18)−0.14488 (18)0.64856 (11)0.0148 (3)
H4A0.4880−0.24180.67200.018*
C50.30408 (18)−0.10912 (18)0.61204 (11)0.0150 (3)
C60.25038 (19)0.03509 (19)0.57931 (12)0.0154 (3)
H6A0.14790.05360.55570.019*
C70.29970 (19)0.31110 (18)0.54971 (12)0.0163 (3)
H7A0.19550.32350.54700.020*
H7B0.35930.38620.59510.020*
C80.0984 (2)0.4858 (2)0.33155 (17)0.0319 (5)
H8A0.07020.58100.29740.048*
H8B0.03990.46960.37600.048*
H8C0.08070.40400.28430.048*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S0.0168 (2)0.0125 (2)0.0157 (2)−0.00083 (14)0.00236 (16)0.00293 (14)
O10.0180 (6)0.0286 (7)0.0219 (7)−0.0040 (5)0.0057 (5)0.0021 (5)
O20.0211 (6)0.0168 (6)0.0175 (6)0.0029 (5)−0.0006 (5)0.0006 (5)
O30.0241 (7)0.0172 (6)0.0263 (7)−0.0011 (5)0.0057 (5)0.0086 (5)
O40.0164 (7)0.0248 (7)0.0529 (9)−0.0036 (5)−0.0030 (6)0.0140 (7)
O50.0237 (6)0.0143 (6)0.0134 (6)0.0010 (5)0.0055 (5)0.0022 (4)
O60.0421 (8)0.0133 (6)0.0230 (6)−0.0022 (5)0.0105 (6)0.0000 (5)
O70.0250 (7)0.0227 (7)0.0200 (6)−0.0002 (5)0.0079 (5)0.0053 (5)
N10.0176 (7)0.0164 (7)0.0138 (6)−0.0001 (6)0.0018 (6)−0.0035 (6)
N20.0189 (7)0.0149 (7)0.0227 (7)−0.0007 (6)0.0052 (6)0.0035 (6)
C10.0207 (8)0.0135 (8)0.0100 (7)0.0010 (6)0.0038 (6)0.0006 (6)
C20.0190 (8)0.0147 (8)0.0126 (7)−0.0022 (6)0.0044 (6)−0.0009 (6)
C30.0155 (8)0.0178 (8)0.0099 (7)0.0001 (6)0.0018 (6)−0.0016 (6)
C40.0200 (8)0.0132 (8)0.0101 (7)0.0020 (6)0.0030 (6)0.0000 (6)
C50.0185 (8)0.0140 (8)0.0124 (7)−0.0028 (6)0.0046 (6)−0.0004 (6)
C60.0171 (8)0.0163 (8)0.0120 (7)0.0010 (6)0.0031 (6)0.0005 (6)
C70.0216 (8)0.0136 (8)0.0136 (8)−0.0003 (6)0.0053 (6)0.0009 (6)
C80.0177 (9)0.0331 (11)0.0390 (12)0.0005 (8)−0.0002 (8)0.0141 (9)
S—O61.4279 (13)C1—C71.507 (2)
S—O71.4290 (13)C2—C31.385 (2)
S—O51.5783 (12)C2—H2A0.9300
S—C81.7538 (19)C3—C41.387 (2)
O1—N11.2289 (19)C4—C51.384 (2)
O2—N11.2322 (18)C4—H4A0.9300
O3—N21.2223 (18)C5—C61.386 (2)
O4—N21.2323 (19)C6—H6A0.9300
O5—C71.4773 (19)C7—H7A0.9700
N1—C31.476 (2)C7—H7B0.9700
N2—C51.473 (2)C8—H8A0.9600
C1—C61.394 (2)C8—H8B0.9600
C1—C21.397 (2)C8—H8C0.9600
O6—S—O7118.62 (8)C5—C4—C3115.40 (15)
O6—S—O5109.52 (7)C5—C4—H4A122.3
O7—S—O5105.51 (7)C3—C4—H4A122.3
O6—S—C8109.88 (10)C4—C5—C6123.88 (15)
O7—S—C8108.68 (9)C4—C5—N2117.80 (14)
O5—S—C8103.51 (8)C6—C5—N2118.32 (14)
C7—O5—S118.62 (10)C5—C6—C1118.68 (15)
O1—N1—O2124.75 (14)C5—C6—H6A120.7
O1—N1—C3117.64 (13)C1—C6—H6A120.7
O2—N1—C3117.61 (14)O5—C7—C1105.58 (13)
O3—N2—O4123.85 (14)O5—C7—H7A110.6
O3—N2—C5118.35 (13)C1—C7—H7A110.6
O4—N2—C5117.80 (14)O5—C7—H7B110.6
C6—C1—C2119.55 (15)C1—C7—H7B110.6
C6—C1—C7120.50 (15)H7A—C7—H7B108.8
C2—C1—C7119.95 (15)S—C8—H8A109.5
C3—C2—C1118.88 (15)S—C8—H8B109.5
C3—C2—H2A120.6H8A—C8—H8B109.5
C1—C2—H2A120.6S—C8—H8C109.5
C2—C3—C4123.55 (15)H8A—C8—H8C109.5
C2—C3—N1118.36 (14)H8B—C8—H8C109.5
C4—C3—N1118.09 (14)
  6 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Antiferromagnetic FeIII6 ring and single-molecule magnet MnII3MnIII4 wheel.

Authors:  Satoshi Koizumi; Masayuki Nihei; Motohiro Nakano; Hiroki Oshio
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  Efficient regioselective synthesis of 6-amino-5-benzoyl-1-substituted 2(1H)-pyridinones.

Authors:  Hartmut Schirok; Cristina Alonso-Alija; Jordi Benet-Buchholz; Andreas H Göller; Rolf Grosser; Martin Michels; Holger Paulsen
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 4.354

4.  A wheel-shaped single-molecule magnet of [MnII 3MnIII 4]: quantum tunneling of magnetization under static and pulse magnetic fields.

Authors:  Satoshi Koizumi; Masayuki Nihei; Takuya Shiga; Motohiro Nakano; Hiroyuki Nojiri; Roland Bircher; Oliver Waldmann; Stefan T Ochsenbein; Hans U Güdel; Felix Fernandez-Alonso; Hiroki Oshio
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.236

5.  Synthesis and evaluation of fluorine-substituted 1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridine derivatives for dopamine D4 receptor imaging.

Authors:  Seung-Jun Oh; Kyo Chul Lee; Sang-Yoon Lee; Eun Kyoung Ryu; Hideo Saji; Yearn Seong Choe; Dae Yoon Chi; Sang Eun Kim; Jeewoo Lee; Byung-Tae Kim
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Design, synthesis and evaluation of ratiometric probes for hydrogencarbonate based on europium emission.

Authors:  Yann Bretonniere; Martin J Cann; David Parker; Rachel Slater
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 3.876

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  2-Nitro-benzyl methane-sulfonate.

Authors:  Venkatramu Anuradha; S Madan Kumar; B P Siddaraju; N K Lokanath; P Nagendra
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2014-04-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.