Literature DB >> 21203053

catena-Poly[manganese(II)-(μ(2)-3,5-di-2-pyridyl-1,2,4-triazol-ato)-μ(2)-formato].

Ya-Wen Zhang, Gong Zhang, Yan-Yan Sun, Lin Cheng.   

Abstract

Owing to the presence of crystallographic twofold rotation axes (site symmetry 2, Wyckoff letters e and f), the asymmetric unit of the title compound, [Mn(C(12)H(8)N(5))(CHO(2))](n), contains one-half of an Mn(II) cation, one-half of a bpt anion (Hbpt is 3,5-di-2-pyridyl-4H-1,2,4-triazole) and one-half of a formate anion. The bpt and formate ligands occupy the same C(2) symmetry, while the Mn(II) ion resides on another crystallographic twofold rotation axis. Each bpt ligand acts as a cis-bis-chelate to ligate two Mn(II) ions into a one-dimensional chain running along the crystallographic 4(1) screw axis. Adjacent Mn(II) ions are further bridged by a μ(2)-formate ligand, completing the distorted octa-hedral coordination geometry of the cation.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21203053      PMCID: PMC2961983          DOI: 10.1107/S160053680802299X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related literature, see: Zhang (2005 ▶); Chen & Tong (2007 ▶). For related structures, see: Cheng et al. (2007a ▶,b ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[Mn(C12H8N5)(CHO2)] M = 322.20 Tetragonal, a = 19.124 (5) Å c = 14.9120 (4) Å V = 5454 (2) Å3 Z = 16 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.98 mm−1 T = 293 (2) K 0.15 × 0.09 × 0.06 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEX CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2000 ▶) T min = 0.867, T max = 0.944 14412 measured reflections 1346 independent reflections 1225 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.054

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.055 wR(F 2) = 0.121 S = 1.09 1346 reflections 97 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.39 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.37 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2000 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680802299X/si2099sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680802299X/si2099Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Mn(C12H8N5)(CHO2)]Z = 16
Mr = 322.20F000 = 2608
Tetragonal, I41/acdDx = 1.570 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -I 4bd 2cMo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 19.124 (5) ÅCell parameters from 810 reflections
b = 19.124 (5) Åθ = 2.5–28.0º
c = 14.9120 (4) ŵ = 0.98 mm1
α = 90ºT = 293 (2) K
β = 90ºNeedle-like, yellow
γ = 90º0.15 × 0.09 × 0.06 mm
V = 5454 (2) Å3
Bruker APEX CCD diffractometer1346 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1225 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.054
T = 293(2) Kθmax = 26.0º
φ and ω scansθmin = 2.1º
Absorption correction: multi-scan(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2000)h = −23→18
Tmin = 0.867, Tmax = 0.944k = −23→23
14412 measured reflectionsl = −18→17
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.055H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.121  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0491P)2 + 25.4234P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.09(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1346 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.39 e Å3
97 parametersΔρmin = −0.37 e Å3
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction correction: none
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Mn10.69057 (3)−0.05943 (3)0.12500.0215 (2)
C10.56957 (19)−0.11100 (19)−0.0239 (2)0.0318 (8)
H1A0.6082−0.1244−0.05760.038*
C20.5042 (2)−0.1237 (2)−0.0580 (2)0.0402 (10)
H2A0.4989−0.1454−0.11340.048*
C30.4464 (2)−0.1038 (2)−0.0088 (3)0.0431 (10)
H3A0.4015−0.1118−0.03050.052*
C40.45662 (19)−0.0717 (2)0.0735 (2)0.0358 (9)
H4A0.4187−0.05790.10820.043*
C50.52424 (17)−0.06066 (18)0.1029 (2)0.0259 (7)
C60.54152 (16)−0.02572 (17)0.1886 (2)0.0214 (7)
C70.75000.0594 (3)0.00000.0300 (11)
H7A0.75000.10800.00000.036*
N10.58042 (15)−0.08037 (14)0.05536 (18)0.0250 (6)
N20.60816 (13)−0.01663 (13)0.20974 (16)0.0196 (6)
N30.4964 (2)0.00000.25000.0272 (9)
O10.70537 (14)0.03180 (15)0.0481 (2)0.0501 (8)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Mn10.0221 (3)0.0221 (3)0.0203 (4)0.0017 (3)0.00432 (19)−0.00432 (19)
C10.0325 (19)0.041 (2)0.0219 (17)0.0094 (16)−0.0010 (15)−0.0133 (15)
C20.041 (2)0.051 (2)0.0280 (18)0.0110 (19)−0.0106 (17)−0.0199 (18)
C30.033 (2)0.060 (3)0.037 (2)0.0061 (18)−0.0149 (17)−0.019 (2)
C40.0266 (19)0.048 (2)0.0325 (19)0.0032 (16)−0.0025 (16)−0.0150 (17)
C50.0272 (18)0.0303 (18)0.0202 (16)0.0008 (14)−0.0028 (13)−0.0057 (14)
C60.0210 (16)0.0264 (17)0.0167 (14)0.0000 (13)−0.0021 (12)−0.0049 (13)
C70.032 (3)0.023 (2)0.035 (3)0.0000.001 (2)0.000
N10.0279 (15)0.0275 (15)0.0197 (14)0.0018 (12)−0.0009 (11)−0.0086 (11)
N20.0225 (14)0.0210 (14)0.0154 (12)−0.0015 (10)−0.0012 (11)−0.0058 (10)
N30.0205 (19)0.039 (2)0.0217 (18)0.0000.000−0.0090 (17)
O10.0370 (16)0.0438 (16)0.069 (2)0.0047 (13)0.0165 (15)0.0253 (15)
Mn1—O12.107 (3)C3—H3A0.9300
Mn1—O1i2.107 (3)C4—C51.382 (5)
Mn1—N2i2.180 (3)C4—H4A0.9300
Mn1—N22.180 (3)C5—N11.341 (4)
Mn1—N12.382 (3)C5—C61.480 (4)
Mn1—N1i2.382 (3)C6—N21.324 (4)
C1—N11.335 (4)C6—N31.350 (4)
C1—C21.372 (5)C7—O11.234 (3)
C1—H1A0.9300C7—O1ii1.234 (3)
C2—C31.379 (5)C7—H7A0.9300
C2—H2A0.9300N2—N2iii1.359 (5)
C3—C41.386 (5)N3—C6iii1.350 (4)
O1—Mn1—O1i94.23 (17)C2—C3—H3A120.6
O1—Mn1—N2i103.46 (11)C4—C3—H3A120.6
O1i—Mn1—N2i95.84 (10)C5—C4—C3118.7 (3)
O1—Mn1—N295.84 (10)C5—C4—H4A120.6
O1i—Mn1—N2103.46 (11)C3—C4—H4A120.6
N2i—Mn1—N2151.55 (13)N1—C5—C4122.6 (3)
O1—Mn1—N191.19 (11)N1—C5—C6113.9 (3)
O1i—Mn1—N1172.74 (12)C4—C5—C6123.5 (3)
N2i—Mn1—N187.58 (9)N2—C6—N3114.0 (3)
N2—Mn1—N171.13 (9)N2—C6—C5118.6 (3)
O1—Mn1—N1i172.74 (12)N3—C6—C5127.4 (3)
O1i—Mn1—N1i91.19 (11)O1—C7—O1ii129.3 (5)
N2i—Mn1—N1i71.13 (9)O1—C7—H7A115.3
N2—Mn1—N1i87.58 (9)O1ii—C7—H7A115.3
N1—Mn1—N1i83.84 (14)C1—N1—C5117.8 (3)
N1—C1—C2123.2 (3)C1—N1—Mn1126.6 (2)
N1—C1—H1A118.4C5—N1—Mn1115.5 (2)
C2—C1—H1A118.4C6—N2—N2iii105.75 (17)
C1—C2—C3119.0 (3)C6—N2—Mn1120.59 (19)
C1—C2—H2A120.5N2iii—N2—Mn1133.48 (7)
C3—C2—H2A120.5C6—N3—C6iii100.6 (4)
C2—C3—C4118.7 (4)C7—O1—Mn1139.8 (3)
  3 in total

1.  Solvothermal in situ metal/ligand reactions: a new bridge between coordination chemistry and organic synthetic chemistry.

Authors:  Xiao-Ming Chen; Ming-Liang Tong
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 22.384

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  In situ solvothermal generation of 1,2,4-triazolates and related compounds from organonitrile and hydrazine hydrate: a mechanism study.

Authors:  Lin Cheng; Wei-Xiong Zhang; Bao-Hui Ye; Jian-Bin Lin; Xiao-Ming Chen
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2007-02-19       Impact factor: 5.165

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.