Literature DB >> 21202986

4-(1H-Tetra-zol-5-yl)benzoic acid monohydrate.

Guo-Qing Li, A-Qing Wu, Yan Li, Fa-Kun Zheng, Guo-Cong Guo.   

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C(8)H(6)N(4)O(2)·H(2)O, consists of one 4-(1H-tetra-zol-5-yl)benzoic acid mol-ecule and one water mol-ecule. Hydrogen-bonding and π-π stacking (centroid-centroid distance between tetra-zole and benzene rings = 3.78 Å) inter-actions link the mol-ecules into a three-dimensional network.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21202986      PMCID: PMC2961711          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808019053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background, see: James et al. (2003 ▶); Kitagawa & Matsuda (2007 ▶); Maspoch et al. (2007 ▶); Pan et al. (2006 ▶); Li et al. (2007 ▶). For related tetra­zole ligands, see: Demko et al. (2001 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H6N4O2·H2O M = 208.18 Monoclinic, a = 4.914 (2) Å b = 5.219 (2) Å c = 34.720 (13) Å β = 91.00 (3)° V = 890.4 (6) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.12 mm−1 T = 293 (2) K 0.20 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Rigaku AFC-7R diffractometer Absorption correction: ψ scan (Psi in ; Rigaku 2002 ▶) T min = 0.927, T max = 1.000 (expected range = 0.917–0.988) 3386 measured reflections 1576 independent reflections 1270 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.028 3 standard reflections every 200 reflections intensity decay: 0.3%

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.037 wR(F 2) = 0.095 S = 1.01 1576 reflections 148 parameters 4 restraints H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.17 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.29 e Å−3 Data collection: WinAFC Diffractometer Control Software (Rigaku, 2002 ▶); cell refinement: WinAFC Diffractometer Control Software; data reduction: CrystalStructure (Rigaku/MSC, 2004 ▶; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808019053/sj2513sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808019053/sj2513Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H6N4O2·H2OF000 = 432
Mr = 208.18Dx = 1.553 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 20 reflections
a = 4.914 (2) Åθ = 12–30º
b = 5.219 (2) ŵ = 0.12 mm1
c = 34.720 (13) ÅT = 293 (2) K
β = 91.00 (3)ºBlock, colorless
V = 890.4 (6) Å30.20 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm
Z = 4
Rigaku AFC-7R diffractometerRint = 0.028
Radiation source: rotating-anode generatorθmax = 25.0º
Monochromator: graphiteθmin = 3.5º
T = 293(2) Kh = −1→5
ω–2θ scansk = −6→6
Absorption correction: ψ scan(Psi in WinAFC Diffractometer Control Software; Rigaku 2002)l = −41→41
Tmin = 0.928, Tmax = 1.0003 standard reflections
3386 measured reflections every 200 reflections
1576 independent reflections intensity decay: 0.3%
1270 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.095  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0403P)2 + 0.366P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.01(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1576 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.17 e Å3
148 parametersΔρmin = −0.29 e Å3
4 restraintsExtinction correction: none
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O1W1.3075 (3)1.2115 (3)0.22404 (4)0.0510 (4)
H1WA1.400 (4)1.292 (4)0.2414 (5)0.061*
H1WB1.175 (3)1.304 (4)0.2153 (6)0.061*
O10.6331 (3)1.1354 (3)0.04240 (4)0.0456 (4)
H10.509 (4)1.157 (6)0.0242 (6)0.100*
O20.7482 (3)0.7840 (3)0.00986 (3)0.0453 (4)
N11.6033 (3)0.8366 (3)0.18939 (4)0.0363 (4)
H21.514 (4)0.965 (3)0.1990 (6)0.068*
N21.8032 (3)0.7255 (3)0.21010 (4)0.0429 (4)
N31.8788 (3)0.5272 (3)0.19041 (4)0.0439 (4)
N41.7318 (3)0.5062 (3)0.15713 (4)0.0396 (4)
C10.9801 (3)0.8752 (3)0.06869 (4)0.0301 (4)
C21.1494 (4)0.6629 (3)0.06537 (5)0.0345 (4)
H2A1.13500.55760.04380.041*
C31.3393 (4)0.6083 (3)0.09416 (5)0.0338 (4)
H3A1.45310.46690.09180.041*
C41.3602 (3)0.7647 (3)0.12651 (4)0.0289 (4)
C51.1923 (4)0.9778 (3)0.12961 (5)0.0340 (4)
H5A1.20761.08390.15110.041*
C61.0034 (3)1.0320 (3)0.10098 (5)0.0332 (4)
H6A0.89081.17420.10330.040*
C70.7755 (3)0.9317 (3)0.03801 (5)0.0319 (4)
C81.5608 (3)0.7022 (3)0.15704 (4)0.0297 (4)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O1W0.0586 (9)0.0478 (9)0.0459 (8)0.0216 (7)−0.0217 (6)−0.0168 (6)
O10.0509 (8)0.0439 (8)0.0414 (7)0.0187 (7)−0.0173 (6)−0.0079 (6)
O20.0510 (8)0.0496 (8)0.0348 (7)0.0147 (7)−0.0156 (6)−0.0130 (6)
N10.0399 (9)0.0372 (9)0.0313 (8)0.0110 (7)−0.0114 (6)−0.0040 (6)
N20.0458 (9)0.0444 (9)0.0380 (8)0.0125 (8)−0.0152 (7)−0.0023 (7)
N30.0463 (9)0.0443 (9)0.0407 (8)0.0143 (8)−0.0138 (7)−0.0013 (7)
N40.0430 (9)0.0381 (9)0.0374 (8)0.0117 (7)−0.0102 (7)−0.0024 (7)
C10.0313 (9)0.0303 (9)0.0286 (8)0.0010 (7)−0.0027 (7)−0.0002 (7)
C20.0396 (10)0.0334 (10)0.0302 (9)0.0043 (8)−0.0055 (7)−0.0071 (7)
C30.0350 (9)0.0318 (9)0.0346 (9)0.0077 (8)−0.0052 (7)−0.0029 (7)
C40.0289 (8)0.0300 (9)0.0277 (8)0.0008 (7)−0.0035 (7)0.0016 (7)
C50.0399 (10)0.0323 (9)0.0294 (9)0.0050 (8)−0.0070 (7)−0.0064 (7)
C60.0360 (9)0.0297 (9)0.0337 (9)0.0080 (8)−0.0052 (7)−0.0027 (7)
C70.0333 (9)0.0326 (9)0.0296 (9)0.0035 (8)−0.0031 (7)−0.0011 (7)
C80.0322 (9)0.0285 (9)0.0284 (8)0.0020 (8)−0.0029 (7)0.0010 (7)
O1W—H1WA0.858 (10)C1—C21.392 (2)
O1W—H1WB0.859 (10)C1—C71.482 (2)
O1—C71.283 (2)C2—C31.385 (2)
O1—H10.877 (10)C2—H2A0.9300
O2—C71.250 (2)C3—C41.391 (2)
N1—C81.337 (2)C3—H3A0.9300
N1—N21.339 (2)C4—C51.390 (2)
N1—H20.872 (10)C4—C81.471 (2)
N2—N31.298 (2)C5—C61.378 (2)
N3—N41.356 (2)C5—H5A0.9300
N4—C81.324 (2)C6—H6A0.9300
C1—C61.391 (2)
H1WA—O1W—H1WB111 (2)C4—C3—H3A120.0
C7—O1—H1113 (2)C5—C4—C3119.78 (15)
C8—N1—N2109.02 (14)C5—C4—C8120.84 (15)
C8—N1—H2130.9 (16)C3—C4—C8119.38 (15)
N2—N1—H2119.7 (15)C6—C5—C4120.14 (15)
N3—N2—N1106.08 (14)C6—C5—H5A119.9
N2—N3—N4111.08 (14)C4—C5—H5A119.9
C8—N4—N3105.55 (14)C5—C6—C1120.35 (16)
C6—C1—C2119.63 (15)C5—C6—H6A119.8
C6—C1—C7120.49 (15)C1—C6—H6A119.8
C2—C1—C7119.88 (15)O2—C7—O1123.55 (15)
C3—C2—C1120.02 (16)O2—C7—C1120.08 (15)
C3—C2—H2A120.0O1—C7—C1116.37 (14)
C1—C2—H2A120.0N4—C8—N1108.27 (14)
C2—C3—C4120.08 (16)N4—C8—C4126.17 (15)
C2—C3—H3A120.0N1—C8—C4125.55 (15)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···O2i0.877 (10)1.744 (10)2.620 (2)176 (3)
O1W—H1WA···N2ii0.858 (10)2.234 (16)2.957 (2)142 (2)
O1W—H1WB···N3iii0.859 (10)2.046 (10)2.903 (2)175 (2)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯O2i0.877 (10)1.744 (10)2.620 (2)176 (3)
O1W—H1WA⋯N2ii0.858 (10)2.234 (16)2.957 (2)142 (2)
O1W—H1WB⋯N3iii0.859 (10)2.046 (10)2.903 (2)175 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  6 in total

1.  Molecule-based ferroelectric thin films: mononuclear lanthanide enantiomers displaying room-temperature ferroelectric and dielectric properties.

Authors:  Xi-Li Li; Kai Chen; Yu Liu; Zhao-Xi Wang; Tian-Wei Wang; Jing-Lin Zuo; Yi-Zhi Li; Yue Wang; Jin Song Zhu; Jun-Min Liu; You Song; Xiao-Zeng You
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Old materials with new tricks: multifunctional open-framework materials.

Authors:  Daniel Maspoch; Daniel Ruiz-Molina; Jaume Veciana
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 54.564

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Zn(tbip) (H2tbip= 5-tert-butyl isophthalic acid): a highly stable guest-free microporous metal organic framework with unique gas separation capability.

Authors:  Long Pan; Brett Parker; Xiaoying Huang; David H Olson; Jeongyong Lee; Jing Li
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Preparation of 5-substituted 1H-tetrazoles from nitriles in water.

Authors:  Z P Demko; K B Sharpless
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2001-11-30       Impact factor: 4.354

Review 6.  Metal-organic frameworks.

Authors:  Stuart L James
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 54.564

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  4-[4-(1H-Tetra-zol-5-yl)phen-oxy]benzaldehyde.

Authors:  Jing Lu; Jiao Xu; Li-Wei Ni; Wei-Li Ma; Zhen-Ting Du
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-10-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.