Literature DB >> 21202742

Poly[{μ(2)-1,2-bis-[4-(3-pyrid-yl)pyrimidin-2-ylsulfan-yl]ethane}di-μ(2)-cyanido-dicopper(I)].

Ya-Wen Zhang, Hua-Ze Dong, Lin Cheng.   

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title complex, [Cu(2)(CN)(2)(C(20)H(16)N(6)S(2))](n), contains one Cu(I) cation, one cyanide ligand and half of a centrosymmetric 1,2-bis-[4-(3-pyrid-yl)pyrimidin-2-ylsulfan-yl]ethane (bppe) ligand. The Cu(I) atom displays a trigonal coordination geometry, being surrounded by one C atom from one cyanide anion and two N atoms from one cyanide and one bppe ligand. In the complex, each cyanide anion links two Cu(I) atoms in a bis-monodentate mode into a zigzag [-Cu-CN-](n) chain. Two parallel chains are linked by bppe ligands into a ladder chain.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21202742      PMCID: PMC2961664          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808013172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related literature, see: Awaleh et al. (2005 ▶); Bu et al. (2003 ▶); Chen et al. (2003 ▶); Su et al. (2000 ▶); Xie et al. (2005 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[Cu2(n class="CellLine">CN)2(C20H16N6S2)] M = 291.81 Monoclinic, a = 16.025 (4) Å b = 16.296 (7) Å c = 9.3103 (17) Å β = 105.660 (19)° V = 2341.1 (12) Å3 Z = 8 Mo Kα radiation μ = 2.02 mm−1 T = 153 (2) K 0.50 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEX CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002 ▶) T min = 0.431, T max = 0.823 6130 measured reflections 2290 independent reflections 1925 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.036

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.032 wR(F 2) = 0.083 S = 1.09 2290 reflections 154 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.41 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.32 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000 ▶); cell refinement: SMART; data reduction: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2000 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808013172/hg2393sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808013172/hg2393Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Cu2(CN)2(C20H16N6S2)]F000 = 1176
Mr = 291.81Dx = 1.656 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 765 reflections
a = 16.025 (4) Åθ = 2.5–28.0º
b = 16.296 (7) ŵ = 2.02 mm1
c = 9.3103 (17) ÅT = 153 (2) K
β = 105.660 (19)ºNeedle-like, colorless
V = 2341.1 (12) Å30.50 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm
Z = 8
Bruker APEX CCD diffractometer2290 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1925 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.036
T = 153(2) Kθmax = 26.0º
φ and ω scansθmin = 2.5º
Absorption correction: multi-scan(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)h = −19→9
Tmin = 0.431, Tmax = 0.823k = −20→19
6130 measured reflectionsl = −11→11
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.083  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0456P)2 + 0.02P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.09(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2290 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.41 e Å3
154 parametersΔρmin = −0.32 e Å3
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction correction: none
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cu10.200534 (18)0.046307 (17)0.73287 (3)0.04397 (13)
S10.58681 (4)0.09504 (5)0.45165 (9)0.0681 (2)
N10.46673 (11)0.17752 (12)0.5455 (2)0.0424 (4)
N20.55869 (14)0.25077 (17)0.4267 (2)0.0624 (6)
N30.25417 (11)0.16006 (11)0.71533 (19)0.0379 (4)
N40.18704 (14)0.00114 (12)0.5379 (2)0.0506 (5)
C10.52978 (14)0.18272 (17)0.4778 (3)0.0496 (6)
C20.52069 (18)0.3195 (2)0.4501 (3)0.0661 (8)
H20.53870.36840.41670.079*
C30.45586 (16)0.32250 (16)0.5214 (3)0.0539 (6)
H30.43080.37190.53730.065*
C40.42959 (13)0.24839 (14)0.5686 (2)0.0386 (5)
C50.35930 (13)0.24308 (13)0.6430 (2)0.0355 (5)
C60.33133 (15)0.31071 (14)0.7073 (3)0.0452 (5)
H60.35700.36170.70450.054*
C70.26579 (16)0.30235 (15)0.7749 (3)0.0514 (6)
H70.24610.34750.81740.062*
C80.22945 (14)0.22636 (15)0.7791 (3)0.0442 (5)
H80.18620.22060.82790.053*
C90.31811 (13)0.16915 (13)0.6502 (2)0.0367 (5)
H90.33610.12330.60710.044*
C100.54252 (17)0.01639 (19)0.5480 (3)0.0632 (7)
H10A0.5837−0.02830.57530.076*
H10B0.53370.03920.63900.076*
C110.18755 (15)−0.01827 (14)0.4207 (3)0.0432 (5)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.0547 (2)0.0449 (2)0.04047 (19)−0.00041 (12)0.02691 (14)0.00271 (11)
S10.0465 (4)0.0949 (6)0.0744 (5)0.0002 (4)0.0360 (3)−0.0228 (4)
N10.0357 (10)0.0536 (12)0.0422 (10)−0.0013 (8)0.0179 (8)−0.0022 (9)
N20.0467 (13)0.0923 (19)0.0555 (14)−0.0152 (12)0.0262 (11)0.0025 (12)
N30.0387 (10)0.0410 (10)0.0402 (10)−0.0013 (8)0.0212 (8)−0.0016 (8)
N40.0740 (14)0.0401 (11)0.0468 (11)0.0020 (10)0.0320 (10)0.0010 (9)
C10.0354 (13)0.0772 (18)0.0396 (12)−0.0048 (11)0.0163 (10)−0.0068 (12)
C20.0510 (16)0.082 (2)0.0691 (18)−0.0173 (15)0.0228 (14)0.0213 (16)
C30.0458 (14)0.0561 (15)0.0623 (16)−0.0030 (11)0.0190 (12)0.0152 (12)
C40.0291 (11)0.0495 (13)0.0379 (11)−0.0011 (9)0.0101 (9)0.0048 (9)
C50.0325 (11)0.0379 (12)0.0370 (11)0.0017 (8)0.0113 (9)0.0054 (8)
C60.0444 (13)0.0359 (12)0.0571 (14)−0.0006 (9)0.0167 (11)0.0006 (10)
C70.0514 (15)0.0442 (14)0.0643 (16)0.0045 (11)0.0253 (12)−0.0131 (12)
C80.0409 (13)0.0515 (14)0.0474 (13)0.0023 (10)0.0241 (10)−0.0046 (11)
C90.0390 (12)0.0361 (11)0.0401 (11)0.0028 (9)0.0193 (9)0.0003 (9)
C100.0495 (15)0.0784 (19)0.0614 (16)0.0148 (14)0.0144 (12)−0.0181 (15)
C110.0614 (15)0.0351 (11)0.0401 (12)0.0082 (10)0.0259 (11)0.0038 (10)
Cu1—C11i1.873 (2)C3—H30.9300
Cu1—N41.916 (2)C4—C51.476 (3)
Cu1—N32.0683 (19)C5—C91.384 (3)
S1—C11.748 (3)C5—C61.385 (3)
S1—C101.815 (3)C6—C71.369 (4)
N1—C11.330 (3)C6—H60.9300
N1—C41.343 (3)C7—C81.374 (3)
N2—C21.321 (4)C7—H70.9300
N2—C11.338 (3)C8—H80.9300
N3—C91.332 (3)C9—H90.9300
N3—C81.343 (3)C10—C10ii1.511 (5)
N4—C111.138 (3)C10—H10A0.9700
C2—C31.376 (4)C10—H10B0.9700
C2—H20.9300C11—Cu1iii1.873 (2)
C3—C41.389 (3)
C11i—Cu1—N4141.12 (9)C9—C5—C6117.2 (2)
C11i—Cu1—N3116.47 (8)C9—C5—C4120.5 (2)
N4—Cu1—N3102.27 (8)C6—C5—C4122.2 (2)
C1—S1—C10102.68 (12)C7—C6—C5119.8 (2)
C1—N1—C4116.6 (2)C7—C6—H6120.1
C2—N2—C1115.1 (2)C5—C6—H6120.1
C9—N3—C8117.83 (19)C6—C7—C8119.1 (2)
C9—N3—Cu1121.50 (14)C6—C7—H7120.4
C8—N3—Cu1120.50 (15)C8—C7—H7120.4
C11—N4—Cu1170.7 (2)N3—C8—C7122.3 (2)
N1—C1—N2127.0 (2)N3—C8—H8118.8
N1—C1—S1120.4 (2)C7—C8—H8118.8
N2—C1—S1112.58 (18)N3—C9—C5123.65 (19)
N2—C2—C3123.5 (3)N3—C9—H9118.2
N2—C2—H2118.3C5—C9—H9118.2
C3—C2—H2118.3C10ii—C10—S1111.6 (3)
C2—C3—C4117.0 (3)C10ii—C10—H10A109.3
C2—C3—H3121.5S1—C10—H10A109.3
C4—C3—H3121.5C10ii—C10—H10B109.3
N1—C4—C3120.8 (2)S1—C10—H10B109.3
N1—C4—C5116.88 (19)H10A—C10—H10B108.0
C3—C4—C5122.3 (2)N4—C11—Cu1iii173.9 (2)
  4 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Coordination networks with flexible ligands based on silver(I) salts: complexes of 1,3-bis(phenylthio)propane with silver(I) salts of PF6-, CF3COO-, CF3CF2COO-, CF3CF2)CF2COO-, p-TsO-, and CF3SO3-.

Authors:  Mohamed Osman Awaleh; Antonella Badia; François Brisse
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  Adjusting the frameworks of silver(I) complexes with new pyridyl thioethers by varying the chain lengths of ligand spacers, solvents, and counteranions.

Authors:  Xian-He Bu; Ya-Bo Xie; Jian-Rong Li; Ruo-Hua Zhang
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2003-11-17       Impact factor: 5.165

4.  Multidimensional frameworks assembled from silver(I) coordination polymers containing flexible bis(thioquinolyl) ligands: role of the intra- and intermolecular aromatic stacking interactions.

Authors:  Chun-Long Chen; Cheng-Yong Su; Yue-Peng Cai; Hua-Xin Zhang; An-Wu Xu; Bei-Sheng Kang; Hans-Conrad Zur Loye
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2003-06-16       Impact factor: 5.165

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  4,4',4''-Tris(2-pyrid-yl)-2,2',2''-[(2,4,6-trimethyl-benzene-1,3,5-tri-yl)tris-(methyl-ene)tris-(sulfanedi-yl)]tripyrimidine.

Authors:  Ya-Wen Zhang; Jian-Quan Wang; Lin Cheng
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-07-11

2.  catena-Poly[[(1,10-phenanthroline)cadmium(II)]-μ-2-(1,3-benzimidazol-2-ylsulfan-yl)acetato-κN,O:N].

Authors:  Lin Cheng; Yan-Yan Sun; Ya-Wen Zhang; Jian-Quan Wang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-12-10

3.  Tris{2-[4-(2-pyrid-yl)pyrimidin-2-ylsulfan-yl]eth-yl}amine.

Authors:  Jian-Quan Wang; Ya-Wen Zhang; Lin Cheng
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-07-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.