Literature DB >> 21202699

Methyl 3-[(E)-furfuryl-idene]dithio-carbazate.

Shang Shan1, Shan-Heng Wang, Ying-Li Xu, Pei-Jin Xie, Yu-Liang Tian.   

Abstract

The mol-ecule of the title Schiff base compound, C(7)H(8)N(2)OS(2), prepared by the reaction of methyl dithio-carbazate and furfural in an ethanol solution under reflux, adopts an E configuration; the dithio-carbazate and furan units are located on opposite sides of the C=N double bond. The planar dithio-carbazate group is twisted slightly with respect to the furan ring, making a dihedral angle of 5.2 (1)°. Adjacent mol-ecules are linked by N-H⋯S hydrogen bonding to form a supra-molecular dimer across an inversion center.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21202699      PMCID: PMC2961615          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808012506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background, see: Okabe et al. (1993 ▶); Shan et al. (2002 ▶, 2003 ▶). For a related structure, see: Chen et al. (2007 ▶). For the synthesis, see: Hu et al. (2001 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H8N2OS2 M = 200.27 Triclinic, a = 4.0866 (8) Å b = 8.8698 (12) Å c = 12.8453 (15) Å α = 93.970 (14)° β = 91.856 (12)° γ = 98.293 (12)° V = 459.21 (12) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.53 mm−1 T = 294 (2) K 0.34 × 0.28 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID IP diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995 ▶) T min = 0.850, T max = 0.950 (expected range = 0.804–0.899) 4733 measured reflections 1608 independent reflections 1349 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.030

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.031 wR(F 2) = 0.096 S = 1.09 1608 reflections 110 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.19 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.28 e Å−3 Data collection: PROCESS-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998 ▶); cell refinement: PROCESS-AUTO; data reduction: CrystalStructure (Rigaku/MSC, 2002 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1993 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808012506/xu2417sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808012506/xu2417Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H8N2OS2Z = 2
Mr = 200.27F000 = 208
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.448 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Melting point = 414–416 K
a = 4.0866 (8) ÅMo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 8.8698 (12) ÅCell parameters from 2276 reflections
c = 12.8453 (15) Åθ = 2.0–25.0º
α = 93.970 (14)ºµ = 0.53 mm1
β = 91.856 (12)ºT = 294 (2) K
γ = 98.293 (12)ºPrism, yellow
V = 459.21 (12) Å30.34 × 0.28 × 0.20 mm
Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID IP diffractometer1608 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1349 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.030
Detector resolution: 10.0 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.2º
T = 294(2) Kθmin = 1.6º
ω scansh = −4→4
Absorption correction: multi-scan(ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995)k = −10→10
Tmin = 0.850, Tmax = 0.950l = −15→14
4733 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.031H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.096  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0598P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.09(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1608 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.19 e Å3
110 parametersΔρmin = −0.28 e Å3
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction correction: none
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.20815 (13)0.27619 (5)0.50863 (4)0.0516 (2)
S20.38692 (13)0.20142 (5)0.28541 (4)0.0506 (2)
N10.1859 (4)0.45265 (16)0.35473 (12)0.0464 (4)
H10.10980.51490.39880.056*
N20.2353 (4)0.49265 (16)0.25394 (11)0.0449 (4)
O10.3206 (4)0.60245 (14)0.05809 (10)0.0553 (4)
C10.2537 (4)0.3197 (2)0.38518 (14)0.0407 (4)
C20.4665 (5)0.0393 (2)0.35393 (17)0.0557 (5)
H2A0.63110.07200.40900.084*
H2B0.5448−0.03430.30620.084*
H2C0.2659−0.00630.38310.084*
C30.1483 (5)0.6216 (2)0.23454 (16)0.0502 (5)
H30.05770.67720.28750.060*
C40.1847 (5)0.6835 (2)0.13501 (16)0.0481 (5)
C50.1076 (7)0.8131 (3)0.09881 (19)0.0685 (6)
H50.01390.88860.13600.082*
C60.1961 (6)0.8126 (3)−0.00661 (18)0.0673 (6)
H60.17050.8873−0.05230.081*
C70.3227 (6)0.6849 (3)−0.02770 (17)0.0608 (6)
H70.40180.6557−0.09200.073*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0714 (4)0.0502 (3)0.0359 (3)0.0125 (2)0.0107 (2)0.0105 (2)
S20.0694 (4)0.0482 (3)0.0378 (3)0.0171 (2)0.0114 (2)0.0072 (2)
N10.0681 (10)0.0401 (8)0.0326 (9)0.0104 (7)0.0108 (7)0.0056 (7)
N20.0614 (10)0.0393 (8)0.0352 (9)0.0078 (7)0.0060 (7)0.0077 (7)
O10.0837 (10)0.0443 (7)0.0418 (8)0.0168 (7)0.0145 (7)0.0112 (6)
C10.0456 (10)0.0405 (9)0.0345 (10)0.0013 (8)0.0024 (8)0.0026 (8)
C20.0701 (14)0.0467 (11)0.0534 (13)0.0161 (9)0.0056 (10)0.0087 (9)
C30.0655 (13)0.0478 (11)0.0390 (11)0.0114 (9)0.0094 (9)0.0051 (9)
C40.0631 (12)0.0419 (10)0.0419 (11)0.0129 (9)0.0072 (9)0.0076 (8)
C50.0988 (17)0.0596 (13)0.0577 (14)0.0391 (12)0.0168 (12)0.0165 (11)
C60.0947 (17)0.0596 (13)0.0544 (15)0.0224 (12)0.0054 (12)0.0278 (11)
C70.0875 (16)0.0583 (12)0.0393 (12)0.0115 (11)0.0109 (10)0.0173 (9)
S1—C11.6675 (18)C2—H2B0.9600
S2—C11.7500 (19)C2—H2C0.9600
S2—C21.800 (2)C3—C41.430 (3)
N1—N21.379 (2)C3—H30.9300
N1—C11.331 (2)C4—C51.344 (3)
N1—H10.8600C5—C61.413 (3)
N2—C31.284 (2)C5—H50.9300
O1—C41.361 (2)C6—C71.327 (4)
O1—C71.364 (2)C6—H60.9300
C2—H2A0.9600C7—H70.9300
C1—S2—C2101.98 (9)N2—C3—C4122.79 (19)
C1—N1—N2121.34 (16)N2—C3—H3118.6
C1—N1—H1119.3C4—C3—H3118.6
N2—N1—H1119.3C5—C4—O1109.57 (17)
C3—N2—N1114.59 (16)C5—C4—C3132.1 (2)
C4—O1—C7106.45 (15)O1—C4—C3118.37 (16)
N1—C1—S1120.76 (14)C4—C5—C6106.8 (2)
N1—C1—S2114.05 (13)C4—C5—H5126.6
S1—C1—S2125.19 (11)C6—C5—H5126.6
S2—C2—H2A109.5C7—C6—C5106.67 (19)
S2—C2—H2B109.5C7—C6—H6126.7
H2A—C2—H2B109.5C5—C6—H6126.7
S2—C2—H2C109.5C6—C7—O1110.5 (2)
H2A—C2—H2C109.5C6—C7—H7124.8
H2B—C2—H2C109.5O1—C7—H7124.8
C1—N1—N2—C3177.62 (17)N2—C3—C4—C5179.2 (2)
N2—N1—C1—S1177.32 (12)N2—C3—C4—O1−0.7 (3)
N2—N1—C1—S2−3.0 (2)O1—C4—C5—C60.7 (3)
C2—S2—C1—N1178.23 (14)C3—C4—C5—C6−179.2 (2)
C2—S2—C1—S1−2.13 (15)C4—C5—C6—C7−0.5 (3)
N1—N2—C3—C4179.09 (17)C5—C6—C7—O10.1 (3)
C7—O1—C4—C5−0.6 (2)C4—O1—C7—C60.3 (3)
C7—O1—C4—C3179.25 (18)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···S1i0.862.653.4892 (17)165
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1⋯S1i0.862.653.4892 (17)165

Symmetry code: (i) .

  2 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Benzaldehyde 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone.

Authors:  Shang Shan; Duan-Jun Xu; Chen-Hsiung Hung; Jing-Yun Wu; Michael Y Chiang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 1.172

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.