Literature DB >> 21202650

1-Methyl-1H-benzimidazole-2(3H)-thione.

Hizbullah Khan, Amin Badshah, Farkhanda Shaheen, Christine Gieck, Rizwana Aleem Qureshi.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(8)H(8)N(2)S, was prepared by the condensation of N-methyl-1,2-phenyl-enediamine and carbon disulfide. The crystal structure is stabilized by a C-H⋯π inter-action between a benzene H atom and the benzene ring of a neighbouring mol-ecule, and by inter-molecular N-H⋯S inter-actions.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21202650      PMCID: PMC2961472          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808015043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related literature, see: Baily et al. (1996 ▶); Koch (2001 ▶); Namgun et al. (2001 ▶); Schuster et al. (1990 ▶); Patel & Chedekel (1984 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H8N2S M = 164.22 Monoclinic, a = 9.997 (4) Å b = 5.8140 (7) Å c = 13.703 (4) Å β = 94.05 (3)° V = 794.5 (4) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.34 mm−1 T = 293 (2) K 0.20 × 0.10 × 0.02 mm

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur2 CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: analytical (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction; 2004 ▶; Clark & Reid, 1995 ▶) T min = 0.929, T max = 0.967 7237 measured reflections 962 independent reflections 855 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.023 θmax = 23.1°

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.029 wR(F 2) = 0.077 S = 1.09 962 reflections 101 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.20 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.19 e Å−3 Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2004 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2004 ▶); data reduction: CrysAlis RED; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2003 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808015043/lx2055sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808015043/lx2055Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H8N2SF000 = 344
Mr = 164.22Dx = 1.373 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMelting point: 402 K
Hall symbol: -P_2ynMo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 9.997 (4) ÅCell parameters from 5701 reflections
b = 5.8140 (7) Åθ = 3.7–23.1º
c = 13.703 (4) ŵ = 0.34 mm1
β = 94.05 (3)ºT = 293 (2) K
V = 794.5 (4) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.20 × 0.10 × 0.02 mm
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur2 CCD diffractometer962 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source855 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.023
Detector resolution: 10.0 pixels mm-1θmax = 23.1º
T = 293(2) Kθmin = 3.8º
ω scansh = −10→11
Absorption correction: analytical(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction; 2004; Clark & Reid, 1995)k = −6→6
Tmin = 0.929, Tmax = 0.967l = −14→14
7237 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.078  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0353P)2 + 0.4983P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.09(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
962 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.21 e Å3
101 parametersΔρmin = −0.19 e Å3
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction correction: none
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S0.73449 (6)0.62833 (10)0.62836 (4)0.0475 (3)
N10.52959 (17)0.3736 (3)0.69273 (12)0.0345 (5)
N20.57646 (17)0.6789 (3)0.78071 (12)0.0380 (5)
H20.61190.80710.80040.046*
C10.6119 (2)0.5599 (4)0.70145 (15)0.0359 (6)
C20.4462 (2)0.3690 (3)0.77058 (15)0.0323 (5)
C30.3528 (2)0.2095 (4)0.79703 (16)0.0399 (6)
H30.33420.07730.76030.048*
C40.2882 (2)0.2566 (4)0.88107 (17)0.0461 (6)
H40.22550.15240.90170.055*
C50.3145 (2)0.4548 (4)0.93499 (17)0.0466 (6)
H50.26840.48120.99060.056*
C60.4079 (2)0.6150 (4)0.90824 (16)0.0412 (6)
H60.42460.74920.94400.049*
C70.4752 (2)0.5656 (4)0.82572 (15)0.0330 (5)
C80.5331 (3)0.1997 (4)0.61682 (17)0.0518 (7)
H8A0.55080.27170.55600.078*
H8B0.44820.12210.60980.078*
H8C0.60260.09040.63450.078*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S0.0446 (4)0.0454 (4)0.0547 (4)0.0026 (3)0.0184 (3)0.0102 (3)
N10.0345 (10)0.0313 (10)0.0384 (10)0.0019 (8)0.0071 (8)−0.0027 (8)
N20.0379 (11)0.0323 (10)0.0443 (11)−0.0042 (8)0.0064 (9)−0.0040 (9)
C10.0350 (12)0.0332 (12)0.0396 (13)0.0068 (11)0.0026 (10)0.0050 (10)
C20.0283 (11)0.0339 (13)0.0348 (12)0.0062 (10)0.0024 (9)0.0023 (10)
C30.0365 (12)0.0356 (13)0.0478 (14)−0.0024 (11)0.0043 (11)−0.0016 (11)
C40.0380 (13)0.0483 (16)0.0529 (15)−0.0053 (11)0.0094 (12)0.0080 (13)
C50.0425 (13)0.0601 (16)0.0383 (13)0.0015 (13)0.0104 (11)0.0021 (12)
C60.0423 (13)0.0431 (14)0.0380 (13)0.0040 (11)0.0017 (10)−0.0060 (11)
C70.0302 (12)0.0330 (12)0.0358 (12)0.0021 (10)0.0019 (10)0.0020 (10)
C80.0536 (15)0.0493 (15)0.0542 (15)−0.0015 (13)0.0150 (12)−0.0150 (13)
S—C11.684 (2)C3—H30.9300
N1—C11.361 (3)C4—C51.384 (3)
N1—C21.400 (3)C4—H40.9300
N1—C81.453 (3)C5—C61.386 (3)
N2—C11.356 (3)C5—H50.9300
N2—C71.389 (3)C6—C71.386 (3)
N2—H20.8600C6—H60.9300
C2—C31.383 (3)C8—H8A0.9600
C2—C71.389 (3)C8—H8B0.9600
C3—C41.387 (3)C8—H8C0.9600
C1—N1—C2109.71 (17)C3—C4—H4119.2
C1—N1—C8124.88 (18)C4—C5—C6121.6 (2)
C2—N1—C8125.34 (18)C4—C5—H5119.2
C1—N2—C7110.71 (18)C6—C5—H5119.2
C1—N2—H2124.6C7—C6—C5116.8 (2)
C7—N2—H2124.6C7—C6—H6121.6
N2—C1—N1106.62 (18)C5—C6—H6121.6
N2—C1—S126.72 (18)C6—C7—N2132.5 (2)
N1—C1—S126.65 (17)C6—C7—C2121.3 (2)
C3—C2—C7121.86 (19)N2—C7—C2106.21 (17)
C3—C2—N1131.46 (19)N1—C8—H8A109.5
C7—C2—N1106.66 (17)N1—C8—H8B109.5
C2—C3—C4116.6 (2)H8A—C8—H8B109.5
C2—C3—H3121.7N1—C8—H8C109.5
C4—C3—H3121.7H8A—C8—H8C109.5
C5—C4—C3121.7 (2)H8B—C8—H8C109.5
C5—C4—H4119.2
C7—N2—C1—N12.4 (2)C2—C3—C4—C50.9 (3)
C7—N2—C1—S−177.28 (16)C3—C4—C5—C6−0.7 (4)
C2—N1—C1—N2−3.2 (2)C4—C5—C6—C7−1.0 (3)
C8—N1—C1—N2179.79 (19)C5—C6—C7—N2−177.1 (2)
C2—N1—C1—S176.50 (15)C5—C6—C7—C22.4 (3)
C8—N1—C1—S−0.5 (3)C1—N2—C7—C6178.9 (2)
C1—N1—C2—C3−175.6 (2)C1—N2—C7—C2−0.7 (2)
C8—N1—C2—C31.4 (3)C3—C2—C7—C6−2.3 (3)
C1—N1—C2—C72.8 (2)N1—C2—C7—C6179.11 (19)
C8—N1—C2—C7179.79 (19)C3—C2—C7—N2177.32 (19)
C7—C2—C3—C40.6 (3)N1—C2—C7—N2−1.2 (2)
N1—C2—C3—C4178.8 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2···Si0.862.573.408 (2)166
C3—H3···Cgii0.932.743.464 (3)136
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N2—H2⋯Si0.862.573.408 (2)166
C3—H3⋯Cgii0.932.743.464 (3)136

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) . Cg is the centroid of the C2–C7 ring.

  1 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  2,2'-Bis(methyl-ene)-3,3'-(2-thioxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzimidazole-1,3-di-yl)dipropane-nitrile.

Authors:  Ould M'hamed Mohamed; Hedi M'rabet; Hanene Hemissi; Mohamed El Efrit
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-10-31

2.  Synthesis and Structural Characterization of 1-Arylimidazole-2-thiones and N,N'-Aryldiethoxyethylthioureas with Electronically Diverse Substituents: A Manifold of Hydrogen Bonding Networks.

Authors:  Joshua H Palmer; Gerard Parkin
Journal:  New J Chem       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.591

Review 3.  13C-NMR Chemical Shifts in 1,3-Benzazoles as a Tautomeric Ratio Criterion.

Authors:  Efrén V García-Báez; Itzia I Padilla-Martínez; Alejandro Cruz; Martha C Rosales-Hernández
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.927

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.