Literature DB >> 2120201

The role of neuropharmacologic selectivity in antidepressant action: fluvoxamine versus desipramine.

R S Nathan1, J M Perel, B G Pollock, D J Kupfer.   

Abstract

Forty patients with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder were entered in a double-blind study to assess comparative clinical response and pharmacologic parameters of fluvoxamine, a highly selective blocker of serotonin reuptake, and desipramine, a noradrenergic agent. Eighteen patients receiving desipramine and 17 patients receiving fluvoxamine completed the study. Fluvoxamine was comparable to desipramine in its antidepressant efficacy and was better tolerated and caused minimal side effects. There was a direct linear relationship between plasma fluvoxamine levels and clinical response and a nonlinear relationship between plasma desipramine levels and clinical response. The pharmacologic specificity of the two drugs was assessed by determining uptake inhibition of serotonin and norepinephrine. The authors found a positive relationship between Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores and norepinephrine uptake inhibition for desipramine but found no such relationship between fluvoxamine and serotonin uptake inhibition. Although there was a clear-cut difference in the quality of pharmacologic specificity and a partial relationship to clinical response, the authors were unable to identify neuropharmacologic factors that would predict either treatment response or selective amelioration of symptomatologies in this patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2120201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  9 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of antidepressants: cost implications and relevance to clinical practice.

Authors:  M J Burke; S H Preskorn
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Pharmacology of serotonin uptake inhibitors: focus on fluvoxamine.

Authors:  P D Hrdina
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 6.186

3.  Adverse effects associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  E Trindade; D Menon; L A Topfer; C Coloma
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-11-17       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Relationship between clinical effects of fluvoxamine and the steady-state plasma concentrations of fluvoxamine and its major metabolite fluvoxamino acid in Japanese depressed patients.

Authors:  Gisa Gerstenberg; Toshiaki Aoshima; Takashi Fukasawa; Keizo Yoshida; Hitoshi Takahashi; Hisashi Higuchi; Yoshiko Murata; Ritsuko Shimoyama; Tadashi Ohkubo; Tetsuo Shimizu; Koichi Otani
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-04-08       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Treatment discontinuation with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  I M Anderson; B M Tomenson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-06-03

Review 6.  Fluvoxamine versus other anti-depressive agents for depression.

Authors:  Ichiro M Omori; Norio Watanabe; Atsuo Nakagawa; Andrea Cipriani; Corrado Barbui; Hugh McGuire; Rachel Churchill; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-03-17

Review 7.  Fluvoxamine. An updated review of its pharmacology, and therapeutic use in depressive illness.

Authors:  M I Wilde; G L Plosker; P Benfield
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Biphasic effect of tricyclic antidepressants on the release of norepinephrine from the adrenergic nerves of the rabbit heart.

Authors:  G T Somogyi; J M Perel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 9.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of fluvoxamine.

Authors:  E Perucca; G Gatti; E Spina
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 6.447

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.