Literature DB >> 21201876

Bis[2-(3-cyano-phenyl-imino-meth-yl)phenolato]nickel(II).

Xing-Xuan Gong1, Rong Xia, Hai-Jun Xu.   

Abstract

In the title complex, [Ni(C(14)H(9)N(2)O)(2)], the Ni(II) atom lies on an inversion center and is coordinated by the O atom and an N atom of two Schiff base 2-(3-cyano-phenyl-imino-meth-yl)phenolate ligands in a square-planar geometry. The dihedral angle between the cyano-phenyl and phenolate rings is 47.62 (7)°.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21201876      PMCID: PMC2960771          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808004765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related literature, see: Adams et al. (2004 ▶); Bian et al. (2004 ▶); Brückner et al. (2000 ▶); Harrop et al. (2003 ▶); Marganian et al. (1995 ▶); Akkurt et al. (2006 ▶); Peng et al. (2006 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[Ni(C14H9N2O)2] M = 501.17 Monoclinic, a = 9.0294 (18) Å b = 8.0856 (16) Å c = 15.644 (3) Å β = 104.01 (3)° V = 1108.1 (4) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.91 mm−1 T = 293 (2) K 0.25 × 0.18 × 0.18 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.852, T max = 1.00 (expected range = 0.723–0.849) 11052 measured reflections 2540 independent reflections 2246 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.035

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.034 wR(F 2) = 0.090 S = 1.10 2540 reflections 160 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.32 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.35 e Å−3 Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996 ▶) and ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808004765/dn2310sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808004765/dn2310Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Ni(C14H9N2O1)2]F000 = 516
Mr = 501.17Dx = 1.502 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 10336 reflections
a = 9.0294 (18) Åθ = 3.1–27.4º
b = 8.0856 (16) ŵ = 0.91 mm1
c = 15.644 (3) ÅT = 293 (2) K
β = 104.01 (3)ºBlock, blue
V = 1108.1 (4) Å30.25 × 0.18 × 0.18 mm
Z = 2
Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer2540 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2246 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.035
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5º
T = 293(2) Kθmin = 3.1º
ω scansh = −11→11
Absorption correction: multi-scan(CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)k = −10→10
Tmin = 0.852, Tmax = 1.00l = −20→20
11052 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.090  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0403P)2 + 0.5389P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.10(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2540 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.32 e Å3
160 parametersΔρmin = −0.35 e Å3
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction correction: none
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Ni10.50000.50000.50000.02514 (11)
O10.66446 (15)0.36034 (17)0.52053 (9)0.0349 (3)
N10.41172 (16)0.38940 (18)0.58415 (10)0.0266 (3)
C90.3215 (2)0.6210 (2)0.65595 (12)0.0302 (4)
H90.41590.67140.66130.036*
C140.2380 (2)0.8635 (3)0.72431 (15)0.0401 (5)
C10.5678 (2)0.1429 (2)0.59534 (12)0.0283 (4)
C100.2087 (2)0.6997 (2)0.68770 (12)0.0318 (4)
C80.2929 (2)0.4678 (2)0.61652 (12)0.0274 (4)
C110.0679 (2)0.6238 (3)0.68133 (14)0.0395 (5)
H11−0.00690.67590.70340.047*
C30.7949 (2)0.1080 (3)0.54150 (14)0.0383 (5)
H30.86630.14920.51300.046*
C20.6729 (2)0.2098 (2)0.55130 (11)0.0286 (4)
C130.1528 (2)0.3938 (3)0.60894 (15)0.0404 (5)
H130.13290.29140.58150.048*
C70.4475 (2)0.2409 (2)0.61321 (12)0.0297 (4)
H70.38970.19420.64880.036*
C50.7059 (3)−0.1167 (3)0.61697 (15)0.0432 (5)
H50.7169−0.22450.63820.052*
N20.2618 (3)0.9944 (2)0.75059 (17)0.0570 (6)
C120.0409 (2)0.4716 (3)0.64212 (17)0.0461 (6)
H12−0.05270.41990.63770.055*
C40.8094 (3)−0.0502 (3)0.57343 (15)0.0430 (5)
H40.8904−0.11490.56580.052*
C60.5875 (3)−0.0197 (2)0.62794 (14)0.0366 (4)
H60.5184−0.06250.65770.044*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Ni10.02507 (18)0.02233 (17)0.03093 (19)0.00178 (12)0.01241 (13)0.00362 (12)
O10.0309 (7)0.0327 (7)0.0458 (8)0.0070 (6)0.0182 (6)0.0125 (6)
N10.0262 (7)0.0245 (7)0.0319 (7)−0.0009 (6)0.0124 (6)−0.0003 (6)
C90.0294 (9)0.0286 (9)0.0360 (9)−0.0003 (7)0.0146 (8)0.0016 (7)
C140.0431 (12)0.0363 (12)0.0480 (12)0.0067 (9)0.0247 (10)0.0000 (9)
C10.0305 (9)0.0236 (9)0.0309 (9)0.0009 (7)0.0075 (7)0.0007 (7)
C100.0348 (10)0.0305 (9)0.0332 (9)0.0058 (8)0.0140 (8)0.0022 (8)
C80.0282 (9)0.0272 (9)0.0300 (9)0.0015 (7)0.0133 (7)0.0023 (7)
C110.0327 (10)0.0449 (12)0.0461 (11)0.0093 (9)0.0194 (9)0.0032 (9)
C30.0335 (10)0.0412 (11)0.0425 (11)0.0088 (9)0.0134 (9)0.0043 (9)
C20.0294 (9)0.0282 (9)0.0278 (9)0.0036 (7)0.0064 (7)0.0020 (7)
C130.0348 (10)0.0378 (11)0.0521 (12)−0.0068 (9)0.0174 (9)−0.0090 (9)
C70.0315 (9)0.0263 (9)0.0335 (9)−0.0034 (7)0.0122 (7)0.0022 (7)
C50.0491 (13)0.0250 (10)0.0528 (13)0.0073 (9)0.0070 (10)0.0048 (9)
N20.0685 (15)0.0369 (11)0.0762 (15)−0.0001 (9)0.0379 (12)−0.0109 (10)
C120.0294 (10)0.0550 (14)0.0592 (14)−0.0081 (9)0.0212 (10)−0.0084 (11)
C40.0407 (12)0.0397 (11)0.0476 (12)0.0173 (9)0.0085 (9)0.0018 (10)
C60.0398 (11)0.0266 (10)0.0437 (11)−0.0013 (8)0.0104 (9)0.0045 (8)
Ni1—O1i1.8310 (14)C8—C131.378 (3)
Ni1—O11.8310 (14)C11—C121.371 (3)
Ni1—N1i1.9174 (15)C11—H110.9300
Ni1—N11.9174 (15)C3—C41.368 (3)
O1—C21.304 (2)C3—C21.413 (3)
N1—C71.297 (2)C3—H30.9300
N1—C81.440 (2)C13—C121.393 (3)
C9—C81.380 (3)C13—H130.9300
C9—C101.391 (3)C7—H70.9300
C9—H90.9300C5—C61.370 (3)
C14—N21.137 (3)C5—C41.390 (3)
C14—C101.442 (3)C5—H50.9300
C1—C61.406 (2)C12—H120.9300
C1—C21.409 (3)C4—H40.9300
C1—C71.426 (3)C6—H60.9300
C10—C111.393 (3)
O1i—Ni1—O1180.000 (1)C10—C11—H11120.4
O1i—Ni1—N1i92.65 (6)C4—C3—C2120.89 (19)
O1—Ni1—N1i87.35 (6)C4—C3—H3119.6
O1i—Ni1—N187.35 (6)C2—C3—H3119.6
O1—Ni1—N192.65 (6)O1—C2—C1123.56 (17)
N1i—Ni1—N1180.000 (1)O1—C2—C3118.75 (17)
C2—O1—Ni1127.78 (12)C1—C2—C3117.68 (17)
C7—N1—C8115.34 (15)C8—C13—C12120.4 (2)
C7—N1—Ni1124.25 (13)C8—C13—H13119.8
C8—N1—Ni1120.35 (12)C12—C13—H13119.8
C8—C9—C10119.75 (18)N1—C7—C1125.63 (17)
C8—C9—H9120.1N1—C7—H7117.2
C10—C9—H9120.1C1—C7—H7117.2
N2—C14—C10177.8 (2)C6—C5—C4118.5 (2)
C6—C1—C2119.71 (18)C6—C5—H5120.7
C6—C1—C7118.93 (18)C4—C5—H5120.7
C2—C1—C7121.21 (16)C11—C12—C13120.4 (2)
C9—C10—C11120.51 (18)C11—C12—H12119.8
C9—C10—C14118.81 (18)C13—C12—H12119.8
C11—C10—C14120.64 (18)C3—C4—C5121.6 (2)
C13—C8—C9119.78 (17)C3—C4—H4119.2
C13—C8—N1121.69 (17)C5—C4—H4119.2
C9—C8—N1118.53 (16)C5—C6—C1121.6 (2)
C12—C11—C10119.20 (19)C5—C6—H6119.2
C12—C11—H11120.4C1—C6—H6119.2
  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  2-pyrrolylthiones as monoanionic bidentate N,S-chelators: synthesis and molecular structure of 2-pyrrolylthionato complexes of nickel(II), cobalt(III), and mercury(II).

Authors:  C Brückner; S J Rettig; D Dolphin
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2000-12-25       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  Dioxygen activation by a dinuclear nickel thiolate complex: structural characterization of the ligand oxidized product.

Authors:  Todd C Harrop; Marilyn M Olmstead; Pradip K Mascharak
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 6.222

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Bis{2-[(2-cyano-phen-yl)imino-meth-yl]phenolato}copper(II).

Authors:  Rong Xia; Hai-Jun Xu; Han Wang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-11-13

2.  Synthesis and characterisation of κ2-N,O-oxazoline-enolate complexes of nickel(ii): explorations in coordination chemistry and metal-mediated polymerisation.

Authors:  Jeanette A Adjei; Alan J Lough; Robert A Gossage
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 4.036

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.