Literature DB >> 21201766

3,7-Dichloro-quinoline-8-carboxylic acid.

Xin-Hong Guo1.   

Abstract

THE TITLE COMPOUND (TRADE NAME: quinclorac), C(10)H(5)Cl(2)NO(2), was crystallized from a dimethyl sulfoxide solution. Quinclorac mol-ecules are packed mainly via π-π stacking inter-actions between neighbouring heterocycles (interplanar distance: 3.31 Å) and via O-H⋯N hydrogen bonding.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21201766      PMCID: PMC2960518          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808026238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the use of 3,7-dichloro­quinoline-8-carboxylic acid as a herbicide, see: Nuria et al. (1997 ▶); Pornprom et al. (2006 ▶); Sunohara & Matsumoto (2004 ▶); Tresch & Grossmann (2002 ▶). For related complexes, see: Li et al. (2008 ▶); Turel et al. (2004 ▶); Zhang et al. (2007 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C10H5Cl2NO2 M = 242.05 Triclinic, a = 7.5002 (12) Å b = 8.4016 (14) Å c = 8.732 (3) Å α = 102.529 (6)° β = 93.439 (6)° γ = 116.479 (4)° V = 472.98 (17) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.66 mm−1 T = 173 (2) K 0.26 × 0.22 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEXII diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 1999 ▶) T min = 0.84, T max = 0.88 5948 measured reflections 1834 independent reflections 1102 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.067

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.063 wR(F 2) = 0.140 S = 1.01 1834 reflections 139 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.30 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.43 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2004 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and PLATON (Spek, 2003 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808026238/zl2136sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808026238/zl2136Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H5Cl2NO2Z = 2
Mr = 242.05F000 = 244
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.700 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.5002 (12) ÅCell parameters from 958 reflections
b = 8.4016 (14) Åθ = 2.1–25.5º
c = 8.732 (3) ŵ = 0.66 mm1
α = 102.529 (6)ºT = 173 (2) K
β = 93.439 (6)ºPrismlike, colorless
γ = 116.479 (4)º0.26 × 0.22 × 0.20 mm
V = 472.98 (17) Å3
Bruker SMART APEXII diffractometer1834 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1102 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.067
T = 173(2) Kθmax = 26.0º
ω scansθmin = 2.4º
Absorption correction: multi-scan(SADABS; Bruker, 1999)h = −9→9
Tmin = 0.84, Tmax = 0.88k = −8→10
5948 measured reflectionsl = −10→10
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.063H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.140  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.062P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.01(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1834 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.30 e Å3
139 parametersΔρmin = −0.43 e Å3
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction correction: none
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.3476 (6)0.5471 (6)0.2465 (5)0.0354 (10)
H10.38610.59570.15830.043*
C20.2932 (6)0.3616 (6)0.2276 (5)0.0324 (9)
C30.2343 (6)0.2876 (6)0.3515 (5)0.0337 (10)
H30.19630.16130.34130.040*
C40.1686 (6)0.3342 (6)0.6269 (5)0.0369 (10)
H40.12860.20860.62200.044*
C50.1655 (7)0.4475 (6)0.7605 (5)0.0363 (10)
H50.12150.40110.84890.044*
C60.2272 (6)0.6342 (6)0.7699 (5)0.0308 (9)
C70.2918 (6)0.7078 (5)0.6455 (5)0.0253 (8)
C80.2910 (5)0.5882 (5)0.5036 (5)0.0261 (8)
C90.2304 (6)0.4002 (5)0.4943 (5)0.0261 (8)
C100.3645 (6)0.9105 (5)0.6610 (4)0.0293 (9)
Cl10.29545 (15)0.22889 (15)0.04666 (12)0.0385 (3)
Cl20.23077 (17)0.77619 (16)0.94953 (12)0.0422 (3)
N10.3496 (5)0.6591 (4)0.3774 (4)0.0283 (7)
O10.5586 (4)0.9997 (4)0.6659 (3)0.0302 (6)
H1A0.597 (7)1.106 (7)0.652 (5)0.036*
O20.2510 (5)0.9766 (4)0.6634 (5)0.0519 (9)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.038 (2)0.041 (3)0.032 (2)0.021 (2)0.0079 (18)0.012 (2)
C20.027 (2)0.032 (2)0.039 (2)0.0174 (19)0.0036 (17)0.0030 (19)
C30.033 (2)0.021 (2)0.049 (2)0.016 (2)0.0051 (19)0.008 (2)
C40.037 (2)0.025 (2)0.053 (3)0.014 (2)0.006 (2)0.022 (2)
C50.043 (2)0.035 (3)0.036 (2)0.019 (2)0.0106 (19)0.017 (2)
C60.0262 (19)0.035 (2)0.033 (2)0.0165 (18)0.0041 (16)0.0098 (19)
C70.028 (2)0.020 (2)0.032 (2)0.0138 (17)0.0062 (16)0.0073 (17)
C80.0180 (18)0.024 (2)0.034 (2)0.0095 (16)0.0014 (15)0.0050 (17)
C90.0258 (18)0.020 (2)0.036 (2)0.0126 (16)0.0030 (16)0.0091 (17)
C100.034 (2)0.025 (2)0.0246 (19)0.0119 (18)0.0010 (15)0.0038 (18)
Cl10.0372 (6)0.0432 (7)0.0423 (6)0.0303 (5)0.0101 (5)−0.0006 (5)
Cl20.0548 (7)0.0433 (7)0.0343 (6)0.0280 (6)0.0144 (5)0.0089 (5)
N10.0318 (18)0.0235 (18)0.0295 (17)0.0130 (15)0.0066 (13)0.0069 (15)
O10.0319 (16)0.0189 (15)0.0364 (16)0.0071 (13)0.0056 (12)0.0120 (13)
O20.048 (2)0.0257 (17)0.092 (3)0.0240 (16)0.0204 (18)0.0171 (18)
C1—N11.308 (5)C5—H50.9500
C1—C21.391 (6)C6—C71.373 (6)
C1—H10.9500C6—Cl21.743 (4)
C2—C31.362 (6)C7—C81.414 (5)
C2—Cl11.731 (4)C7—C101.510 (5)
C3—C91.403 (6)C8—N11.369 (5)
C3—H30.9500C8—C91.417 (5)
C4—C51.345 (6)C10—O21.206 (5)
C4—C91.405 (5)C10—O11.299 (5)
C4—H40.9500O1—H1A0.84 (5)
C5—C61.405 (6)
N1—C1—C2124.6 (4)C7—C6—Cl2119.9 (3)
N1—C1—H1117.7C5—C6—Cl2118.0 (3)
C2—C1—H1117.7C6—C7—C8117.8 (4)
C3—C2—C1118.9 (4)C6—C7—C10121.0 (3)
C3—C2—Cl1121.5 (3)C8—C7—C10121.2 (3)
C1—C2—Cl1119.6 (3)N1—C8—C7118.2 (4)
C2—C3—C9119.2 (4)N1—C8—C9121.6 (3)
C2—C3—H3120.4C7—C8—C9120.2 (4)
C9—C3—H3120.4C3—C9—C4122.9 (4)
C5—C4—C9120.5 (4)C3—C9—C8118.0 (4)
C5—C4—H4119.7C4—C9—C8119.1 (3)
C9—C4—H4119.7O2—C10—O1125.4 (4)
C4—C5—C6120.2 (4)O2—C10—C7122.5 (3)
C4—C5—H5119.9O1—C10—C7112.1 (3)
C6—C5—H5119.9C1—N1—C8117.7 (3)
C7—C6—C5122.1 (4)C10—O1—H1A113 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1A···N1i0.84 (5)1.91 (5)2.753 (4)173 (4)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O1—H1A⋯N1i0.84 (5)1.91 (5)2.753 (4)173 (4)

Symmetry code: (i) .

  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  The role of altered acetyl-CoA carboxylase in conferring resistance to fenoxaprop-P-ethyl in Chinese sprangletop (Leptochloa chinensis (L.) Nees).

Authors:  Tosapon Pornprom; Parnuwat Mahatamnuchoke; Kenji Usui
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.845

3.  catena-Poly[cobalt(II)-bis-(μ-3,7-dichloro-quinoline-8-carboxyl-ato-κN,O:O')].

Authors:  Zequan Li; Fengjing Wu; Yun Gong; Yunhuai Zhang; Chenguang Bai
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2007-12-21
  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Ethyl 3,7-dichloro-quinoline-8-carboxyl-ate.

Authors:  Fengxia Zhu; Li-Tao An; Min Xia; Jian-Feng Zhou
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-10-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.