Literature DB >> 21201568

Safflorite, (Co,Ni,Fe)As(2), isomorphous with marcasite.

Hexiong Yang1, Robert T Downs, Carla Eichler.   

Abstract

Safflorite, a naturally occurring cobalt-nickel-iron diarsenide (Co,Ni,Fe)As(2), possesses the marcasite-type structure, with cations (M = Co + Ni + Fe) at site symmetry 2/m and As anions at m. The MAs(6) octa-hedra share two edges, forming chains parallel to c. The chemical formula for safflorite should be expressed as (Co,Ni,Fe)As(2), rather than the end-member format CoAs(2), as its structure stabilization requires the simultaneous inter-action of the electronic states of Co, Ni, and Fe with As(2) (2-) dianions.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21201568      PMCID: PMC2960506          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808026688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related literature, see: Anawar et al. (2003 ▶); Carlon & Bleeker (1988 ▶); Darmon & Wintenberger (1966 ▶); Ennaciri et al. (1995 ▶); Goodenough (1967 ▶); Grorud (1997 ▶); Hem et al. (2001 ▶); Holmes (1947 ▶); King (2002 ▶); Kjekshus (1971 ▶); Kjekshus et al. (1974 ▶, 1979 ▶); Lutz et al. (1987 ▶); Makovicky (2006 ▶); O’Day (2006 ▶); Ondrus et al. (2001 ▶); Palenik et al. (2004 ▶); Petruk et al. (1971 ▶); Radcliffe & Berry (1968 ▶, 1971 ▶); Reich et al. (2005 ▶); Robinson et al. (1971 ▶); Swanson et al. (1966 ▶); Tossell (1984 ▶); Tossell et al. (1981 ▶); Vaughan & Rosso (2006 ▶); Wagner & Lorenz (2002 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

As1.99Co0.61Fe0.17Ni0.22S0.01 M = 207.77 Orthorhombic, a = 5.0669 (6) Å b = 5.8739 (7) Å c = 3.1346 (4) Å V = 93.29 (2) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 43.75 mm−1 T = 293 (2) K 0.06 × 0.05 × 0.04 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEX2 CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (TWINABS; Sheldrick, 2007 ▶) T min = 0.179, T max = 0.274 (expected range = 0.114–0.174) 1232 measured reflections 254 independent reflections 227 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.041

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.025 wR(F 2) = 0.061 S = 0.91 254 reflections 13 parameters Δρmax = 1.44 e Å−3 Δρmin = −1.82 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2003 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2005 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: XtalDraw (Downs & Hall-Wallace, 2003 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, New_Global_Publ_Block. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808026688/mg2054sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808026688/mg2054Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
As1.99Co0.61Fe0.17Ni0.22S0.01F000 = 168
Mr = 207.77Dx = 7.396 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PnnmMo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2 2nCell parameters from 153 reflections
a = 5.0669 (6) Åθ = 5.0–31.4º
b = 5.8739 (7) ŵ = 43.75 mm1
c = 3.1346 (4) ÅT = 293 (2) K
V = 93.29 (2) Å3Granular, black
Z = 20.06 × 0.05 × 0.04 mm
Bruker APEX2 CCD area-detector diffractometer254 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube227 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.041
T = 293(2) Kθmax = 36.4º
φ and ω scanθmin = 5.3º
Absorption correction: multi-scan(TWINABS; Sheldrick, 2007)h = −8→7
Tmin = 0.179, Tmax = 0.274k = −8→9
1232 measured reflectionsl = −5→5
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0428P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.025(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
wR(F2) = 0.061Δρmax = 1.44 e Å3
S = 0.91Δρmin = −1.82 e Å3
254 reflectionsExtinction correction: SHELXL, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
13 parametersExtinction coefficient: 0.016 (6)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
M0.00000.00000.00000.0130 (2)
As0.18637 (9)0.36589 (7)0.00000.01033 (17)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
M0.0090 (4)0.0033 (4)0.0267 (4)0.0001 (3)0.0000.000
As0.0140 (3)0.0046 (2)0.0124 (2)−0.00002 (14)0.0000.000
M—As2.3475 (5)M—Asiii2.3669 (4)
M—Asi2.3475 (5)M—Asiv2.3669 (4)
M—Asii2.3669 (4)M—Asv2.3669 (4)
As—M—Asii88.016 (9)M—As—Mvi125.085 (13)
Asi—M—Asii91.984 (9)Mvi—As—Mvii82.931 (17)
Asii—M—Asiv82.931 (17)M—As—Asviii106.12 (3)
Asiii—M—Asiv97.069 (17)Mvi—As—Asviii107.599 (2)
  2 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Quadratic elongation: a quantitative measure of distortion in coordination polyhedra.

Authors:  K Robinson; G V Gibbs; P H Ribbe
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.