Literature DB >> 21201472

4-[(2H-Tetra-zol-2-yl)meth-yl]benzonitrile.

Zheng Xing1, Zhi-Rong Qu.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(9)H(7)N(5), was synthesized by reaction of 4-(bromomethyl)benzonitrile and 2H-tetrazole in the presence of KOH. The relative orientation of the planar tetra-zole ring and the methyl-benzonitrile moiety is (-)-anti-clinal. The crystal packing is dominated by van der Waals inter-actions.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21201472      PMCID: PMC2960265          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808000809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the chemisty of tetra­zoles, see: Bethel et al. (1999 ▶); Wu et al. (2005 ▶); Zhang et al. (2006 ▶); Jin et al. (1994 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C9H7N5 M = 185.20 Triclinic, a = 5.7514 (8) Å b = 7.4029 (10) Å c = 11.3511 (12) Å α = 81.088 (3)° β = 77.844 (3)° γ = 72.600 (5)° V = 448.64 (10) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.09 mm−1 T = 293 (2) K 0.20 × 0.12 × 0.02 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.980, T max = 0.996 4114 measured reflections 1720 independent reflections 923 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.045

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.053 wR(F 2) = 0.156 S = 0.92 1720 reflections 132 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.17 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.16 e Å−3 Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808000809/kp2157sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808000809/kp2157Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C9H7N5Z = 2
Mr = 185.20F000 = 192
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.371 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 5.7514 (8) ÅCell parameters from 655 reflections
b = 7.4029 (10) Åθ = 3.3–27.4º
c = 11.3511 (12) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
α = 81.088 (3)ºT = 293 (2) K
β = 77.844 (3)ºBlock, colourless
γ = 72.600 (5)º0.20 × 0.12 × 0.02 mm
V = 448.64 (10) Å3
Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer1720 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube923 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.045
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1θmax = 26.0º
T = 293(2) Kθmin = 3.3º
CCD_Profile_fitting scansh = −7→7
Absorption correction: multi-scan(CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)k = −9→9
Tmin = 0.980, Tmax = 0.996l = −13→13
4114 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.053  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0718P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.156(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 0.92Δρmax = 0.17 e Å3
1720 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.16 e Å3
132 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier mapExtinction coefficient: 0.044 (14)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N21.0618 (5)0.2439 (4)0.4265 (2)0.0821 (8)
C10.3315 (4)0.9248 (4)0.9005 (2)0.0554 (6)
C20.4374 (4)0.7403 (3)0.8573 (2)0.0502 (6)
C30.6613 (4)0.6272 (3)0.8855 (2)0.0547 (7)
H30.74450.67030.93240.066*
C40.7606 (4)0.4506 (3)0.8438 (2)0.0560 (7)
H40.91210.37490.86220.067*
C50.6377 (4)0.3841 (3)0.7748 (2)0.0525 (6)
C60.4133 (5)0.4976 (4)0.7479 (2)0.0621 (7)
H60.32920.45410.70180.075*
C70.3128 (5)0.6752 (4)0.7891 (2)0.0606 (7)
H70.16130.75100.77080.073*
C80.7485 (5)0.1932 (3)0.7266 (2)0.0611 (7)
H8A0.83290.10400.78650.073*
H8B0.61760.14600.71240.073*
N10.8605 (4)0.2339 (4)0.5064 (2)0.0764 (7)
C91.2358 (6)0.2213 (5)0.4920 (3)0.0730 (9)
N31.1596 (4)0.1945 (3)0.6083 (2)0.0703 (7)
N40.9239 (4)0.2044 (3)0.61371 (17)0.0550 (6)
N50.2481 (4)1.0719 (3)0.9343 (2)0.0770 (8)
H91.385 (6)0.208 (5)0.462 (3)0.116 (13)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N20.0782 (17)0.103 (2)0.0630 (15)−0.0277 (15)−0.0037 (14)−0.0081 (13)
C10.0509 (14)0.0546 (15)0.0616 (16)−0.0117 (13)−0.0132 (12)−0.0098 (13)
C20.0510 (14)0.0511 (14)0.0485 (13)−0.0148 (12)−0.0083 (11)−0.0038 (11)
C30.0527 (15)0.0602 (16)0.0554 (15)−0.0151 (12)−0.0162 (12)−0.0101 (12)
C40.0481 (14)0.0594 (15)0.0569 (15)−0.0083 (12)−0.0081 (12)−0.0091 (12)
C50.0569 (15)0.0506 (14)0.0493 (14)−0.0184 (12)−0.0030 (12)−0.0045 (11)
C60.0635 (17)0.0629 (17)0.0672 (17)−0.0183 (14)−0.0200 (13)−0.0144 (13)
C70.0489 (14)0.0657 (17)0.0690 (17)−0.0118 (12)−0.0165 (12)−0.0113 (13)
C80.0634 (16)0.0532 (15)0.0625 (15)−0.0163 (13)0.0032 (13)−0.0118 (12)
N10.0705 (16)0.0940 (18)0.0654 (15)−0.0193 (14)−0.0167 (13)−0.0102 (13)
C90.063 (2)0.087 (2)0.070 (2)−0.0270 (17)0.0022 (17)−0.0190 (16)
N30.0574 (14)0.0879 (17)0.0730 (16)−0.0225 (12)−0.0144 (12)−0.0204 (13)
N40.0550 (13)0.0549 (12)0.0575 (13)−0.0148 (10)−0.0104 (10)−0.0124 (10)
N50.0703 (16)0.0659 (16)0.0962 (18)−0.0046 (13)−0.0285 (13)−0.0211 (13)
N2—C91.326 (4)C5—C81.502 (3)
N2—N11.325 (3)C6—C71.380 (3)
C1—N51.141 (3)C6—H60.9300
C1—C21.436 (3)C7—H70.9300
C2—C71.379 (3)C8—N41.463 (3)
C2—C31.381 (3)C8—H8A0.9700
C3—C41.375 (3)C8—H8B0.9700
C3—H30.9300N1—N41.312 (3)
C4—C51.384 (3)C9—N31.304 (3)
C4—H40.9300C9—H90.84 (3)
C5—C61.379 (3)N3—N41.324 (3)
C9—N2—N1105.1 (2)C2—C7—C6119.9 (2)
N5—C1—C2179.6 (3)C2—C7—H7120.0
C7—C2—C3120.1 (2)C6—C7—H7120.0
C7—C2—C1119.7 (2)N4—C8—C5111.39 (19)
C3—C2—C1120.2 (2)N4—C8—H8A109.4
C4—C3—C2119.6 (2)C5—C8—H8A109.4
C4—C3—H3120.2N4—C8—H8B109.4
C2—C3—H3120.2C5—C8—H8B109.4
C3—C4—C5120.8 (2)H8A—C8—H8B108.0
C3—C4—H4119.6N4—N1—N2106.5 (2)
C5—C4—H4119.6N3—C9—N2113.6 (3)
C6—C5—C4119.2 (2)N3—C9—H9122 (3)
C6—C5—C8120.0 (2)N2—C9—H9124 (2)
C4—C5—C8120.9 (2)C9—N3—N4102.1 (2)
C5—C6—C7120.5 (2)N1—N4—N3112.7 (2)
C5—C6—H6119.8N1—N4—C8123.1 (2)
C7—C6—H6119.8N3—N4—C8124.1 (2)
C7—C2—C3—C40.8 (4)C4—C5—C8—N4−83.5 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C4179.9 (2)C9—N2—N1—N4−0.6 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C5−0.6 (4)N1—N2—C9—N31.0 (3)
C3—C4—C5—C60.1 (4)N2—C9—N3—N4−1.0 (3)
C3—C4—C5—C8178.5 (2)N2—N1—N4—N30.0 (3)
C4—C5—C6—C70.1 (4)N2—N1—N4—C8177.3 (2)
C8—C5—C6—C7−178.3 (2)C9—N3—N4—N10.6 (3)
C3—C2—C7—C6−0.6 (4)C9—N3—N4—C8−176.6 (2)
C1—C2—C7—C6−179.7 (2)C5—C8—N4—N1−92.0 (3)
C5—C6—C7—C20.1 (4)C5—C8—N4—N384.9 (3)
C6—C5—C8—N494.9 (3)
  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Syntheses and structures of metal tetrazole coordination polymers.

Authors:  Xian-Ming Zhang; Yan-Fei Zhao; Hai-Shun Wu; Stuart R Batten; Seik Weng Ng
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 4.390

3.  Two novel nanoporous supramolecular architectures based on copper(i) coordination polymers with uniform (8, 3) and (8(2)10) nets: in situ formation of tetrazolate ligands.

Authors:  Tao Wu; Bi-Hua Yi; Dan Li
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 5.165

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.