Literature DB >> 21201417

2,5-Dibenzoyl-benzene-1,4-diaminium dichloride.

Shui-Ping Deng1, Shan Liu, Fei Yang, Ji-Ling Xu, Hong-Jun Zhu.   

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C(20)H(18)N(2)O(2) (2+)·2Cl(-), is composed of one-half of the 2,5-dibenzoyl-benzene-1,4-diaminium dication, located on a centre of inversion, and one Cl(-) ion. The dihedral angle between the central benzene ring and the benzoyl phenyl ring is 53.3 (2)°. In the crystal structure, ions are linked to form a two-dimensional network parallel to the (10) plane by N-H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21201417      PMCID: PMC2960277          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807068730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987 ▶). For general background, see: Antoniadis et al. (1994 ▶); Imai et al. (1975 ▶); Kolosov et al. (2002 ▶); Tonzola et al. (2003 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C20H18N2O2 2+·2Cl− M = 389.26 Monoclinic, a = 12.373 (3) Å b = 5.195 (1) Å c = 14.315 (3) Å β = 104.46 (3)° V = 891.0 (4) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.38 mm−1 T = 298 (2) K 0.40 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968 ▶) T min = 0.862, T max = 0.963 1754 measured reflections 1754 independent reflections 1232 reflections with I > 2σ(I) 3 standard reflections every 200 reflections intensity decay: none

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.055 wR(F 2) = 0.162 S = 1.08 1754 reflections 130 parameters 3 restraints H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.30 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.28 e Å−3 Data collection: CAD-4 Software (Enraf–Nonius, 1985 ▶); cell refinement: CAD-4 Software; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2000 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807068730/ci2546sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807068730/ci2546Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C20H18N2O22+·2ClF000 = 404
Mr = 389.26Dx = 1.451 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 12.373 (3) Åθ = 9–13º
b = 5.195 (1) ŵ = 0.38 mm1
c = 14.315 (3) ÅT = 298 (2) K
β = 104.46 (3)ºBlock, colourless
V = 891.0 (4) Å30.40 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm
Z = 2
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer1232 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.0000
Monochromator: graphiteθmax = 26.0º
T = 298(2) Kθmin = 2.0º
ω/2θ scansh = −15→14
Absorption correction: ψ scan(North et al., 1968)k = 0→6
Tmin = 0.862, Tmax = 0.963l = 0→17
1754 measured reflections3 standard reflections
1754 independent reflections every 200 reflections
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.055H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.162  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0704P)2 + 0.5685P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.08(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1754 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.31 e Å3
130 parametersΔρmin = −0.27 e Å3
3 restraintsExtinction correction: none
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.2971 (2)0.0151 (5)−0.11097 (19)0.0386 (7)
N10.6436 (3)0.5247 (6)0.1879 (2)0.0265 (7)
H1N0.635 (4)0.655 (7)0.224 (3)0.073 (17)*
H2N0.633 (3)0.394 (7)0.222 (3)0.045 (12)*
H3N0.714 (2)0.517 (8)0.188 (3)0.040 (12)*
C10.1700 (4)0.2318 (8)0.1666 (3)0.0438 (10)
H10.16880.34590.21640.053*
C20.1003 (3)0.0237 (9)0.1510 (3)0.0450 (10)
H20.0508−0.00080.18960.054*
C30.1022 (3)−0.1489 (8)0.0793 (3)0.0442 (10)
H30.0558−0.29220.07060.053*
C40.1732 (3)−0.1104 (7)0.0200 (3)0.0372 (9)
H40.1731−0.2260−0.02960.045*
C50.2448 (3)0.1002 (7)0.0339 (3)0.0274 (8)
C60.2430 (3)0.2733 (7)0.1081 (3)0.0352 (9)
H60.29020.41540.11840.042*
C70.3141 (3)0.1395 (6)−0.0361 (2)0.0262 (8)
C80.4074 (3)0.3311 (6)−0.0166 (2)0.0230 (7)
C90.4812 (3)0.3497 (7)0.0737 (2)0.0250 (7)
H90.46970.24840.12390.030*
C100.5707 (3)0.5142 (6)0.0907 (2)0.0230 (7)
Cl10.59773 (8)0.02097 (17)0.29914 (7)0.0350 (3)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0478 (16)0.0345 (15)0.0357 (14)−0.0127 (13)0.0148 (12)−0.0065 (12)
N10.0268 (15)0.0226 (16)0.0272 (15)−0.0029 (14)0.0015 (12)0.0026 (14)
C10.054 (3)0.037 (2)0.047 (2)−0.004 (2)0.025 (2)−0.008 (2)
C20.039 (2)0.051 (3)0.050 (2)0.002 (2)0.0205 (19)0.010 (2)
C30.041 (2)0.035 (2)0.060 (3)−0.0108 (19)0.019 (2)0.004 (2)
C40.048 (2)0.026 (2)0.040 (2)−0.0095 (18)0.0165 (18)−0.0018 (17)
C50.0274 (18)0.0209 (17)0.0343 (19)−0.0024 (14)0.0082 (15)0.0009 (15)
C60.042 (2)0.0258 (19)0.039 (2)−0.0010 (16)0.0108 (17)0.0012 (16)
C70.0291 (18)0.0184 (16)0.0309 (18)0.0025 (14)0.0070 (15)0.0041 (14)
C80.0242 (16)0.0171 (16)0.0276 (17)0.0007 (13)0.0059 (13)0.0017 (14)
C90.0307 (18)0.0199 (17)0.0254 (17)−0.0008 (14)0.0091 (14)0.0050 (14)
C100.0284 (17)0.0182 (16)0.0214 (15)0.0012 (14)0.0046 (13)−0.0003 (14)
Cl10.0418 (5)0.0276 (5)0.0393 (5)0.0038 (4)0.0168 (4)0.0054 (4)
O1—C71.223 (4)C4—C51.390 (5)
N1—C101.458 (4)C4—H40.93
N1—H1N0.87 (3)C5—C61.396 (5)
N1—H2N0.87 (3)C5—C71.487 (5)
N1—H3N0.87 (2)C6—H60.93
C1—C21.366 (6)C7—C81.497 (5)
C1—C61.393 (5)C8—C91.388 (5)
C1—H10.93C8—C10i1.409 (4)
C2—C31.367 (6)C9—C101.372 (5)
C2—H20.93C9—H90.93
C3—C41.381 (5)C10—C8i1.409 (4)
C3—H30.93
C10—N1—H1N117 (3)C4—C5—C6119.0 (3)
C10—N1—H2N111 (3)C4—C5—C7117.7 (3)
H1N—N1—H2N102 (4)C6—C5—C7123.1 (3)
C10—N1—H3N112 (3)C1—C6—C5119.6 (4)
H1N—N1—H3N108 (4)C1—C6—H6120.2
H2N—N1—H3N105 (4)C5—C6—H6120.2
C2—C1—C6120.1 (4)O1—C7—C5121.1 (3)
C2—C1—H1119.9O1—C7—C8118.1 (3)
C6—C1—H1119.9C5—C7—C8120.9 (3)
C1—C2—C3120.8 (4)C9—C8—C10i117.1 (3)
C1—C2—H2119.6C9—C8—C7121.2 (3)
C3—C2—H2119.6C10i—C8—C7121.6 (3)
C2—C3—C4120.0 (4)C10—C9—C8121.5 (3)
C2—C3—H3120.0C10—C9—H9119.2
C4—C3—H3120.0C8—C9—H9119.2
C3—C4—C5120.4 (4)C9—C10—C8i121.4 (3)
C3—C4—H4119.8C9—C10—N1118.1 (3)
C5—C4—H4119.8C8i—C10—N1120.5 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1N···Cl1ii0.87 (4)2.29 (4)3.155 (3)172 (4)
N1—H2N···Cl10.87 (4)2.33 (4)3.187 (3)174 (4)
N1—H3N···Cl1iii0.87 (3)2.29 (3)3.159 (4)175 (2)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1N⋯Cl1i0.87 (4)2.29 (4)3.155 (3)172 (4)
N1—H2N⋯Cl10.87 (4)2.33 (4)3.187 (3)174 (4)
N1—H3N⋯Cl1ii0.87 (3)2.29 (3)3.159 (4)175 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  1,8-Naphthalimides in phosphorescent organic LEDs: the interplay between dopant, exciplex, and host emission.

Authors:  Dmitry Kolosov; Vadim Adamovich; Peter Djurovich; Mark E Thompson; Chihaya Adachi
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-08-21       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  New n-type organic semiconductors: synthesis, single crystal structures, cyclic voltammetry, photophysics, electron transport, and electroluminescence of a series of diphenylanthrazolines.

Authors:  Christopher J Tonzola; Maksudul M Alam; Werner Kaminsky; Samson A Jenekhe
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-11-05       Impact factor: 15.419

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.