Literature DB >> 21201312

catena-Poly[silver(I)-μ-pyrazolato-κN:N'].

Chao-Yan Zhang1, Jian-Bo Feng, Qian Gao, Ya-Bo Xie.   

Abstract

The title compound, [Ag(C(3)H(3)N(2))](n), has an infinite helical chain structure in which each pyrazolate group bridges two Ag(I) atoms related by a 2(1) axis with an intra-chain Ag⋯Ag separation of 3.3718 (7) Å. Each Ag(I) center is linearly coordinated by two N atoms [N-Ag-N angle = 169.98 (14)°]. The chains are held together by inter-chain Ag⋯Ag inter-actions [3.2547 (6) Å], forming a two-dimensional layer. The X-ray single-crystal diffraction result is consonant with that of the ab initio X-ray powder diffraction reported by Masciocchi, Moret, Cairati, Sironi, Ardizzoia & La Monica [J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1994). 116, 7668-7676], with only minor deviations of structural parameters.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21201312      PMCID: PMC2960218          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807063490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related literature, see: Masciocchi et al. (1994 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[Ag(C3H3N2)] M = 174.94 Orthorhombic, a = 6.4084 (13) Å b = 6.4989 (13) Å c = 19.948 (4) Å V = 830.8 (3) Å3 Z = 8 Mo Kα radiation μ = 4.66 mm−1 T = 293 (2) K 0.40 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 1998 ▶) T min = 0.340, T max = 0.400 7019 measured reflections 951 independent reflections 778 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.044

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.041 wR(F 2) = 0.066 S = 1.26 951 reflections 55 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.38 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.55 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1998 ▶); data reduction: SHELXTL (Bruker, 1998 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807063490/bq2042sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807063490/bq2042Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Ag(C3H3N2)]F000 = 656
Mr = 174.94Dx = 2.797 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PbcaMo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 6390 reflections
a = 6.4084 (13) Åθ = 3.1–27.7º
b = 6.4989 (13) ŵ = 4.66 mm1
c = 19.948 (4) ÅT = 293 (2) K
V = 830.8 (3) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 80.40 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm
Bruker Smart CCD area-detector diffractometer951 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube778 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.044
T = 293(2) Kθmax = 27.5º
φ and ω scanθmin = 3.8º
Absorption correction: multi-scan(SADABS; Bruker, 1998)h = −8→7
Tmin = 0.340, Tmax = 0.400k = −8→8
7019 measured reflectionsl = −25→25
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.066  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0145P)2 + 0.695P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.26(Δ/σ)max = 0.004
951 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.38 e Å3
55 parametersΔρmin = −0.55 e Å3
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction correction: none
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Ag10.23552 (5)0.32951 (6)1.004623 (15)0.04206 (16)
N10.3965 (5)0.3598 (6)0.91516 (17)0.0345 (9)
N20.5800 (5)0.2552 (6)0.90915 (17)0.0364 (9)
C10.3418 (7)0.4213 (7)0.8548 (2)0.0403 (12)
H1A0.22170.49580.84500.048*
C20.4861 (7)0.3606 (7)0.8087 (2)0.0448 (12)
H2A0.48510.38360.76270.054*
C30.6325 (7)0.2581 (7)0.8457 (2)0.0425 (12)
H3A0.75280.19860.82820.051*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Ag10.0444 (3)0.0411 (3)0.0407 (2)−0.00048 (16)0.00707 (18)−0.00123 (16)
N10.038 (2)0.032 (2)0.033 (2)0.0036 (18)0.0039 (16)−0.0005 (17)
N20.037 (2)0.037 (2)0.036 (2)0.0002 (17)0.0017 (17)−0.0002 (18)
C10.048 (3)0.026 (3)0.047 (3)0.006 (2)−0.009 (2)0.002 (2)
C20.062 (3)0.040 (3)0.033 (3)−0.010 (3)0.002 (2)0.003 (2)
C30.044 (3)0.036 (3)0.048 (3)−0.001 (2)0.011 (2)−0.006 (2)
Ag1—N12.070 (3)N2—C31.310 (5)
Ag1—N2i2.063 (4)C1—C21.362 (6)
Ag1—Ag1ii3.2547 (6)C1—H1A0.9300
Ag1—Ag1i3.3718 (7)C2—C31.367 (6)
N1—C11.316 (5)C2—H2A0.9300
N1—N21.364 (5)C3—H3A0.9300
N2i—Ag1—N1169.98 (14)C1—N1—N2107.5 (3)
N2i—Ag1—Ag1ii76.18 (10)C1—N1—Ag1133.2 (3)
N1—Ag1—Ag1ii93.82 (10)N2—N1—Ag1117.3 (3)
N2i—Ag1—Ag1iii107.09 (10)C3—N2—N1107.4 (3)
N1—Ag1—Ag1iii82.91 (10)C3—N2—Ag1iv133.3 (3)
Ag1ii—Ag1—Ag1iii173.46 (2)N1—N2—Ag1iv118.5 (2)
N2i—Ag1—Ag1i60.31 (10)N1—C1—C2110.4 (4)
N1—Ag1—Ag1i117.09 (10)N1—C1—H1A124.8
Ag1ii—Ag1—Ag1i75.415 (18)C2—C1—H1A124.8
Ag1iii—Ag1—Ag1i111.111 (17)C1—C2—C3104.1 (4)
N2i—Ag1—Ag1iv115.02 (10)C1—C2—H2A128.0
N1—Ag1—Ag1iv60.57 (10)C3—C2—H2A128.0
Ag1ii—Ag1—Ag1iv68.889 (17)N2—C3—C2110.6 (4)
Ag1iii—Ag1—Ag1iv104.585 (18)N2—C3—H3A124.7
Ag1i—Ag1—Ag1iv143.72 (3)C2—C3—H3A124.7
N2i—Ag1—N1—C1108.9 (8)C1—N1—N2—C30.7 (5)
Ag1ii—Ag1—N1—C1112.0 (4)Ag1—N1—N2—C3166.6 (3)
Ag1iii—Ag1—N1—C1−73.6 (4)C1—N1—N2—Ag1iv171.5 (3)
Ag1i—Ag1—N1—C136.5 (5)Ag1—N1—N2—Ag1iv−22.6 (4)
Ag1iv—Ag1—N1—C1175.2 (5)N2—N1—C1—C2−0.3 (5)
N2i—Ag1—N1—N2−52.6 (9)Ag1—N1—C1—C2−163.1 (3)
Ag1ii—Ag1—N1—N2−49.4 (3)N1—C1—C2—C3−0.1 (6)
Ag1iii—Ag1—N1—N2124.9 (3)N1—N2—C3—C2−0.8 (5)
Ag1i—Ag1—N1—N2−124.9 (3)Ag1iv—N2—C3—C2−169.6 (3)
Ag1iv—Ag1—N1—N213.7 (2)C1—C2—C3—N20.6 (6)
Ag1—N12.070 (3)
Ag1—N2i2.063 (4)
Ag1⋯Ag1ii3.2547 (6)
Ag1⋯Ag1i3.3718 (7)
N2i—Ag1—N1169.98 (14)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  1 in total

1.  Synthesis and Structural Characterization of a Silver(I) Pyrazolato Coordination Polymer.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Fujisawa; Takuya Nemoto; Yui Morishima; Daniel B Leznoff
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 4.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.