Literature DB >> 21201248

Poly[hexa-aqua-copper(II) [di-μ(3)-sulfato-disodiate(I)]].

Wen Wu, J-M Xie, D-P Xie, Y-W Xuan.   

Abstract

The title compound, {[Cu(H(2)O)(6)][Na(2)(SO(4))(2)]}(n), has been prepared under mild hydro-thermal conditions and has been structurally characterized. It exhibits a structure in which the inorganic frameworks are three-dimensional, participating in extensive hydrogen bonding. Copper occupies a special position (). The Na atom is coordinated by five O atoms of four sulfates [Na-O distances are between 2.825 (3) and 2.983 (3) Å]. The four O atoms of the sulfate ligand are coordinated to four Na atoms, the sulfate ligands coordinating in a chelating/bridging tetra-dentate mode.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21201248      PMCID: PMC2960320          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807067608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the structure of [C6H18N2]0.5[Fe(SO4)2(H2O)2], see: Fu et al. (2006 ▶)

Experimental

Crystal data

[Cu(H2O)6][Na2(SO4)2] M = 409.74 Monoclinic, a = 6.2345 (12) Å b = 12.333 (3) Å c = 9.1822 (18) Å β = 105.56 (3)° V = 680.1 (3) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 2.04 mm−1 T = 291 (2) K 0.20 × 0.17 × 0.17 mm

Data collection

Rigaku R-AXIS IV diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004 ▶) T min = 0.607, T max = 0.709 2371 measured reflections 1322 independent reflections 1257 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.026

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.036 wR(F 2) = 0.092 S = 1.09 1322 reflections 113 parameters 4 restraints H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.51 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.42 e Å−3 Data collection: PROCESS (Rigaku, 1996 ▶); cell refinement: PROCESS; data reduction: PROCESS; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997 ▶); molecular graphics: TEXSAN (Molecular Structure Corporation, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: TEXSAN. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807067608/fi2054sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807067608/fi2054Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Cu(H2O)6][Na2(SO4)2]F000 = 414
Mr = 409.74Dx = 2.001 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 289 reflections
a = 6.2345 (12) Åθ = 2–25.1º
b = 12.333 (3) ŵ = 2.04 mm1
c = 9.1822 (18) ÅT = 291 (2) K
β = 105.56 (3)ºPrismatic, blue
V = 680.1 (3) Å30.20 × 0.17 × 0.17 mm
Z = 2
Rigaku R-AXIS IV diffractometer1322 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1257 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.026
Detector resolution: 0 pixels mm-1θmax = 26.0º
T = 291(2) Kθmin = 2.8º
Oscillation frames scansh = 0→7
Absorption correction: multi-scan(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004)k = −15→15
Tmin = 0.607, Tmax = 0.709l = −11→10
2371 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.092  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0419P)2 + 1.2605P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.09(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1322 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.51 e Å3
113 parametersΔρmin = −0.42 e Å3
4 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.053 (4)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cu10.50000.50001.00000.0195 (2)
S10.76455 (13)0.63853 (6)0.59661 (9)0.0249 (2)
Na10.8483 (3)0.35098 (12)0.62649 (17)0.0382 (4)
O10.5346 (4)0.3875 (2)0.8249 (3)0.0340 (6)
O20.3313 (4)0.6137 (2)0.8339 (3)0.0360 (6)
H2F0.192 (3)0.594 (4)0.786 (4)0.045 (12)*
H2E0.409 (8)0.620 (4)0.765 (4)0.062 (15)*
O30.7863 (4)0.5650 (2)0.9976 (3)0.0253 (5)
H3F0.801 (8)0.627 (4)1.025 (6)0.054 (15)*
O40.8777 (4)0.56884 (18)0.7250 (2)0.0289 (5)
O50.7360 (5)0.5768 (3)0.4569 (3)0.0486 (8)
O60.9065 (4)0.7338 (2)0.5942 (3)0.0412 (7)
O70.5467 (4)0.6744 (2)0.6153 (3)0.0357 (6)
H3E0.825 (7)0.563 (3)0.911 (3)0.036 (11)*
H1F0.439 (7)0.401 (4)0.734 (3)0.068 (16)*
H1E0.503 (7)0.327 (4)0.846 (5)0.038 (12)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.0200 (3)0.0198 (3)0.0185 (3)−0.00122 (18)0.0047 (2)0.00199 (18)
S10.0269 (4)0.0244 (4)0.0222 (4)0.0025 (3)0.0046 (3)0.0043 (3)
Na10.0385 (8)0.0395 (8)0.0391 (8)−0.0010 (6)0.0149 (7)−0.0020 (6)
O10.0213 (14)0.0204 (14)0.0257 (13)−0.0061 (11)0.0075 (11)0.0023 (11)
O20.0210 (13)0.0221 (15)0.0255 (13)−0.0063 (11)0.0076 (11)0.0023 (11)
O30.0262 (11)0.0255 (12)0.0260 (12)−0.0027 (9)0.0099 (9)−0.0009 (9)
O40.0315 (12)0.0313 (13)0.0239 (11)0.0042 (10)0.0075 (9)0.0080 (9)
O50.0633 (19)0.0553 (18)0.0234 (13)0.0095 (15)0.0051 (12)−0.0072 (12)
O60.0347 (14)0.0320 (13)0.0557 (17)−0.0018 (11)0.0100 (12)0.0155 (12)
O70.0258 (12)0.0333 (13)0.0477 (15)0.0045 (10)0.0094 (11)0.0033 (11)
Cu1—O3i1.962 (2)Na1—O7ii2.856 (3)
Cu1—O31.962 (2)Na1—O6iii2.983 (3)
Cu1—O2i2.130 (3)O1—H1F0.90 (3)
Cu1—O22.130 (3)O1—H1E0.81 (5)
Cu1—O12.178 (3)O2—H2F0.90 (3)
Cu1—O1i2.178 (3)O2—H2E0.90 (4)
S1—O51.461 (3)O3—H3F0.80 (5)
S1—O61.475 (3)O3—H3E0.89 (3)
S1—O41.476 (2)O6—Na1iv2.983 (3)
S1—O71.482 (3)O7—Na1ii2.856 (3)
Na1—O42.825 (3)
O3i—Cu1—O3180.0O5—S1—O7110.99 (17)
O3i—Cu1—O2i89.95 (10)O6—S1—O7109.63 (15)
O3—Cu1—O2i90.05 (10)O4—S1—O7109.74 (14)
O3i—Cu1—O290.05 (10)O4—Na1—O7ii108.76 (8)
O3—Cu1—O289.95 (10)O4—Na1—O6iii102.19 (8)
O2i—Cu1—O2180.000 (1)O7ii—Na1—O6iii138.69 (9)
O3i—Cu1—O191.07 (10)Cu1—O1—H1F113 (4)
O3—Cu1—O188.93 (10)Cu1—O1—H1E109 (3)
O2i—Cu1—O188.93 (10)H1F—O1—H1E104 (5)
O2—Cu1—O191.07 (10)Cu1—O2—H2F113 (3)
O3i—Cu1—O1i88.93 (10)Cu1—O2—H2E108 (3)
O3—Cu1—O1i91.07 (10)H2F—O2—H2E109 (4)
O2i—Cu1—O1i91.07 (10)Cu1—O3—H3F114 (4)
O2—Cu1—O1i88.93 (10)Cu1—O3—H3E118 (3)
O1—Cu1—O1i180.000 (1)H3F—O3—H3E105 (4)
O5—S1—O6109.52 (18)S1—O4—Na1108.78 (12)
O5—S1—O4108.50 (16)S1—O6—Na1iv122.98 (15)
O6—S1—O4108.40 (15)S1—O7—Na1ii120.20 (14)
O5—S1—O4—Na1−16.47 (19)O4—S1—O6—Na1iv−41.0 (2)
O6—S1—O4—Na1−135.34 (14)O7—S1—O6—Na1iv78.82 (19)
O7—S1—O4—Na1104.95 (14)O5—S1—O7—Na1ii−9.3 (2)
O7ii—Na1—O4—S1−28.50 (15)O6—S1—O7—Na1ii111.83 (17)
O6iii—Na1—O4—S1179.25 (12)O4—S1—O7—Na1ii−129.22 (15)
O5—S1—O6—Na1iv−159.17 (16)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2F···O4v0.90 (3)1.915 (15)2.790 (3)166 (4)
O3—H3F···O6vi0.80 (5)1.89 (5)2.674 (4)167 (5)
O1—H1F···O5ii0.90 (3)1.82 (3)2.719 (4)175 (5)
O1—H1E···O7vii0.80 (5)1.96 (5)2.759 (4)173 (4)
O2—H2E···O70.90 (4)1.93 (4)2.800 (4)164 (5)
O3—H3E···O40.89 (3)1.83 (3)2.712 (3)174 (4)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O2—H2F⋯O4i0.90 (3)1.915 (15)2.790 (3)166 (4)
O3—H3F⋯O6ii0.80 (5)1.89 (5)2.674 (4)167 (5)
O1—H1F⋯O5iii0.90 (3)1.82 (3)2.719 (4)175 (5)
O1—H1E⋯O7iv0.80 (5)1.96 (5)2.759 (4)173 (4)
O2—H2E⋯O70.90 (4)1.93 (4)2.800 (4)164 (5)
O3—H3E⋯O40.89 (3)1.83 (3)2.712 (3)174 (4)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) .

  1 in total

1.  Organically directed iron sulfate chains: structural diversity based on hydrogen bonding interactions.

Authors:  Yunlong Fu; Zhiwei Xu; Jialin Ren; Haishun Wu; Rong Yuan
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 5.165

  1 in total
  1 in total

1.  Structural and thermal properties of Na2Mn(SO4)2·4H2O and Na2Ni(SO4)2·10H2O.

Authors:  Hamdi Ben Yahia; Alaa Alkhateeb; Rachid Essehli
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.361

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.