Literature DB >> 21201245

Poly[[hexa-μ-cyanido-manganese(II)iron(III)] penta-hydrate].

Tomoyuki Matsuda, Hiroko Tokoro, Motoo Shiro, Kazuhito Hashimoto, Shin-Ichi Ohkoshi.   

Abstract

The structure of the title compound, Mn(II)[Fe(III)(CN)(6)](2/3)·5H(2)O, features a face-centered cubic -Mn-NC-Fe- framework with both Mn and Fe having site symmetry mm. Since one-third of the [Fe(CN)(6)](3-) units are missing for a given formula in order to maintain charge neutrality, each Mn atom around such a vacancy is coordinated not only by the N atoms of the CN groups but also by the O atoms of the ligand water mol-ecules. In addition to ligand water mol-ecules, two types of non-coordinated water mol-ecules, so-called zeolitic water mol-ecules, exist in the inter-stitial sites of the -Mn-NC-Fe- framework. The positions of the O atoms of the zeolitic water mol-ecules are fixed by the linkage via hydrogen bonds between ligand water and zeolitic water mol-ecules. The structure is related to a recently reported rubidium manganese hexa-cyano-ferrate. Site occupancy factors for Fe, C, N are 0.67; for two O atoms the value is 0.83 and for one O atom is 0.17.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21201245      PMCID: PMC2960286          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807068869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For structure and properties of the related rubidium manganese hexa­cyano­ferrate, see: Kato et al. (2003 ▶); Tokoro et al. (2007 ▶). For general background on Prussian blue compounds, see: Ludi & Güdel (1973 ▶). For related literature, see: Egan et al. (2006 ▶); Ferlay et al. (1995 ▶); Güdel et al. (1973 ▶); Gadet et al. (1992 ▶); Hatlevik et al. (1999 ▶); Holmes & Girolami (1999 ▶); Ludi et al. (1970 ▶); Margadonna et al. (2004 ▶); Ohkoshi & Hashimoto (2001 ▶); Ohkoshi et al. (1997 ▶, 2000 ▶, 2004 ▶, 2005 ▶); Sato et al. (1996 ▶); Tokoro et al. (2003 ▶, 2004 ▶); Zeigler et al. (1999 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

Mn[Fe(CN)6]2/3·5H2O M = 286.50 Cubic, a = 10.3859 (13) Å V = 1120.3 (2) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 2.02 mm−1 T = 90 (1) K 0.25 × 0.20 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995 ▶) T min = 0.655, T max = 0.739 15777 measured reflections 278 independent reflections 268 reflections with F 2 > 2σ(F 2) R int = 0.032

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.047 wR(F 2) = 0.136 S = 1.37 278 reflections 21 parameters H-atom parameters not defined Δρmax = 0.59 e Å−3 Δρmin = −1.41 e Å−3 Data collection: PROCESS-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998 ▶); cell refinement: PROCESS-AUTO; data reduction: CrystalStructure (Rigaku, 2007 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: VESTA (Momma & Izumi, 2006 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: CrystalStructure. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807068869/sq2003sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807068869/sq2003Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
Mn[Fe(CN)6]0.6667·5H2OZ = 4
Mr = 286.50F000 = 577.68
Cubic, Fm3mDx = 1.699 Mg m3Dm = 1.64 (1) Mg m3Dm measured by flotation in toluene and tetrabromomethane
Hall symbol: -F 4 2 3Mo Kα radiation λ = 0.71075 Å
a = 10.3859 (13) ÅCell parameters from 3216 reflections
b = 10.3859 (13) Åθ = 5.6–45.1º
c = 10.3859 (13) ŵ = 2.02 mm1
α = 90ºT = 90 (1) K
β = 90ºBlock, brown
γ = 90º0.25 × 0.20 × 0.15 mm
V = 1120.3 (2) Å3
Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer268 reflections with F2 > 2σ(F2)
Detector resolution: 10.00 pixels mm-1Rint = 0.032
ω scansθmax = 45.1º
Absorption correction: multi-scan(ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995)h = −20→20
Tmin = 0.655, Tmax = 0.739k = −20→20
15777 measured reflectionsl = −20→20
278 independent reflections
Refinement on F2  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0526P)2 + 2.6431P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.047(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
wR(F2) = 0.136Δρmax = 0.59 e Å3
S = 1.37Δρmin = −1.41 e Å3
278 reflectionsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997)
21 parametersExtinction coefficient: 0.002 (2)
H-atom parameters not defined
Refinement. Refinement was performed using all reflections. The weighted R-factor (wR) and goodness of fit (S) are based on F2. R-factor (gt) are based on F. The threshold expression of F2 > 2.0 σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factor (gt).
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
Fe10.50000.50000.00000.0176 (2)0.6667
Mn10.50000.50000.50000.0183 (2)
O10.4576 (10)0.4576 (10)0.2922 (11)0.036 (3)0.0833
O20.75000.25000.25000.096 (6)0.8333
O30.6550 (16)0.3450 (16)0.1550 (16)0.054 (6)0.1667
N10.50000.50000.2973 (12)0.086 (3)0.6667
C10.50000.50000.1847 (8)0.064 (2)0.6667
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Fe10.0176 (2)0.0176 (2)0.0176 (2)0.00000.00000.0000
Mn10.0183 (2)0.0183 (2)0.0183 (2)0.00000.00000.0000
O10.052 (5)0.052 (5)0.006 (3)−0.026 (5)−0.002 (2)−0.002 (2)
O20.096 (6)0.096 (6)0.096 (6)0.00000.00000.0000
O30.054 (6)0.054 (6)0.054 (6)−0.018 (6)0.018 (6)−0.018 (6)
N10.114 (5)0.114 (5)0.030 (3)0.00000.00000.0000
C10.085 (4)0.085 (4)0.023 (2)0.00000.00000.0000
Fe1—C11.918 (8)Mn1—O1ix2.247 (12)
Fe1—C1i1.918 (8)Mn1—O1xiii2.247 (12)
Fe1—C1ii1.918 (8)Mn1—O1x2.247 (12)
Fe1—C1iii1.918 (8)Mn1—O1xiv2.247 (12)
Fe1—C1iv1.918 (8)Mn1—O1xv2.247 (12)
Fe1—C1v1.918 (8)Mn1—O1xvi2.247 (12)
Mn1—N12.105 (13)Mn1—O1xvii2.247 (12)
Mn1—N1vi2.105 (13)Mn1—O1xviii2.247 (12)
Mn1—N1vii2.105 (13)Mn1—O1xix2.247 (12)
Mn1—N1viii2.105 (13)Mn1—O1xx2.247 (12)
Mn1—N1ix2.105 (13)Mn1—O1xxi2.247 (12)
Mn1—N1x2.105 (13)Mn1—O1xxii2.247 (12)
N1—C11.169 (15)Mn1—O1xxiii2.247 (12)
Mn1—O12.247 (12)Mn1—O1xxiv2.247 (12)
Mn1—O1vi2.247 (12)Mn1—O1xxv2.247 (12)
Mn1—O1vii2.247 (12)Mn1—O1xxvi2.247 (12)
Mn1—O1viii2.247 (12)Mn1—O1xxvii2.247 (12)
Mn1—O1xi2.247 (12)Mn1—O1xxviii2.247 (12)
Mn1—O1xii2.247 (12)
C1—Fe1—C1i180.0000N1ix—Mn1—N1x90.0000
C1—Fe1—C1ii90.0000Mn1—N1—C1180.0000
C1—Fe1—C1iii90.0000Fe1—C1—N1180.0000
C1—Fe1—C1iv90.0000O1—Mn1—O1vi65.5 (4)
C1—Fe1—C1v90.0000O1—Mn1—O1vii65.5 (4)
C1i—Fe1—C1ii90.0000O1—Mn1—O1viii147.8 (3)
C1i—Fe1—C1iii90.0000O1—Mn1—O1xi87.8 (4)
C1i—Fe1—C1iv90.0000O1—Mn1—O1xii87.8 (4)
C1i—Fe1—C1v90.0000O1—Mn1—O1ix109.8 (4)
C1ii—Fe1—C1iii180.0000O1—Mn1—O1xiii92.2 (4)
C1ii—Fe1—C1iv90.0000O1—Mn1—O1x109.8 (4)
C1ii—Fe1—C1v90.0000O1—Mn1—O1xiv157.4 (3)
C1iii—Fe1—C1iv90.0000O1—Mn1—O1xv92.2 (4)
C1iii—Fe1—C1v90.0000O1—Mn1—O1xvi157.4 (3)
C1iv—Fe1—C1v180.0000O1—Mn1—O1xvii180.0 (5)
N1—Mn1—N1vi90.0000O1—Mn1—O1xviii114.5 (4)
N1—Mn1—N1vii90.0000O1—Mn1—O1xix114.5 (4)
N1—Mn1—N1viii180.0000O1—Mn1—O1xxi92.2 (4)
N1—Mn1—N1ix90.0000O1—Mn1—O1xxii92.2 (4)
N1—Mn1—N1x90.0000O1—Mn1—O1xxiii70.2 (4)
N1vi—Mn1—N1vii90.0000O1—Mn1—O1xxiv87.8 (4)
N1vi—Mn1—N1viii90.0000O1—Mn1—O1xxv70.2 (4)
N1vi—Mn1—N1ix180.0000O1—Mn1—O1xxvii87.8 (4)
N1vi—Mn1—N1x90.0000O1—Mn1—N1vi78.69 (14)
N1vii—Mn1—N1viii90.0000O1—Mn1—N1vii78.19 (14)
N1vii—Mn1—N1ix90.0000O1—Mn1—N1viii163.90 (14)
N1vii—Mn1—N1x180.0000O1—Mn1—N1ix101.31 (14)
N1viii—Mn1—N1ix90.0000O1—Mn1—N1x101.31 (14)
N1viii—Mn1—N1x90.0000
Fe1—C11.918 (8)
Mn1—N12.105 (13)
N1—C11.169 (15)
Mn1—O12.247 (12)
O1—Mn1—O1i87.8 (4)
O1—Mn1—O1ii157.4 (3)
O1—Mn1—O1iii180
O1—Mn1—N1iv78.69 (14)
O1—Mn1—N1v163.90 (14)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) .

  7 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Pressure-induced sequential magnetic pole inversion and antiferromagnetic-ferromagnetic crossover in a trimetallic prussian blue analogue.

Authors:  Lindsay Egan; Konstantin Kamenev; Dionisis Papanikolaou; Yasuhiro Takabayashi; Serena Margadonna
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Zero thermal expansion in a Prussian Blue analogue.

Authors:  Serena Margadonna; Kosmas Prassides; Andrew N Fitch
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Humidity-induced magnetization and magnetic pole inversion in a cyano-bridged metal assembly.

Authors:  Shin-Ichi Ohkoshi; Ken-Ichi Arai; Yusuke Sato; Kazuhito Hashimoto
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2004-11-21       Impact factor: 43.841

5.  Photoinduced Magnetization of a Cobalt-Iron Cyanide

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-05-03       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A large thermal hysteresis loop produced by a charge-transfer phase transition in a rubidium manganese hexacyanoferrate.

Authors:  Hiroko Tokoro; Shin-ichi Ohkoshi; Tomoyuki Matsuda; Kazuhito Hashimoto
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2004-08-23       Impact factor: 5.165

7.  Direct observation of charge transfer in double-perovskite-like RbMn[Fe(CN)6].

Authors:  K Kato; Y Moritomo; M Takata; M Sakata; M Umekawa; N Hamada; S Ohkoshi; H Tokoro; K Hashimoto
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 9.161

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.