Literature DB >> 21200997

A two-dimensional organic-inorganic hybrid compound, poly[(ethylenediamine)tri-μ-oxido-oxidocopper(II)molybdenum(VI)].

Ozgul Gun, Don Vanderveer, Mehtap Emirdag-Eanes.   

Abstract

A new organic-inorganic two-dimensional hybrid compound, [CuMoO(4)(C(2)H(8)N(2))], has been hydro-thermally synthesized at 443 K. The unit cell contains layers composed of CuN(2)O(4) octa-hedra and MoO(4) tetra-hedra. Corner-sharing MoO(4) and CuN(2)O(4) polyhedra form CuMoO(4) bimetallic sites that are joined together through O atoms, forming an edge-sharing Cu(2)Mo(2)O(4) chain along the c axis. The one-dimensional chains are further linked through bridging O atoms that join the Cu and Mo atoms into respective chains along the b axis, thus establishing layers in the bc plane. The ethyl-enediamine ligand is coordinated to the Cu atom through its two N atoms and is oriented perpendicularly to the two-dimensional -Cu-O-Mo- layers. The average distance between adjacent layers, as calculated by consideration of the closest and furthest distances between two layers, is 8.7 Å. The oxidation states of the Mo and Cu atoms of VI and II, respectively, were confirmed by bond-valence sum calculations.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21200997      PMCID: PMC2959353          DOI: 10.1107/S160053680802792X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related literature on inorganic–organic hybrid materials, see: Gopalakrishnan (1995 ▶); Katsoulis (1998 ▶); Kresge et al. (1992 ▶). For related structures containing molybdate(VI) units, see: Cui et al. (2005 ▶); Niven et al. (1991 ▶). For the thermal behaviour of a related ethyl­enediamine-containing compound, see: Han et al. (2005 ▶). For general background, see: Brown & Altermatt (1985 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[CuMoO4(C2H8N2)] M = 283.58 Monoclinic, a = 9.954 (4) Å b = 9.436 (4) Å c = 7.674 (3) Å β = 107.734 (18)° V = 686.6 (5) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 4.88 mm−1 T = 303 (2) K 0.41 × 0.06 × 0.02 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Mercury CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (REQAB; Jacobson, 1998 ▶) T min = 0.678, T max = 1.000 (expected range = 0.615–0.907) 5616 measured reflections 1209 independent reflections 1098 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.089

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.063 wR(F 2) = 0.111 S = 1.10 1209 reflections 91 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.79 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.92 e Å−3 Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku/MSC, 2001 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680802792X/wm2192sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680802792X/wm2192Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[CuMoO4(C2H8N2)]F(000) = 548
Mr = 283.58Dx = 2.743 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 4208 reflections
a = 9.954 (4) Åθ = 2.2–26.0°
b = 9.436 (4) ŵ = 4.88 mm1
c = 7.674 (3) ÅT = 303 K
β = 107.734 (18)°Column, blue
V = 686.6 (5) Å30.41 × 0.06 × 0.02 mm
Z = 4
Rigaku Mercury CCD diffractometer1209 independent reflections
Radiation source: Sealed Tube1098 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite MonochromatorRint = 0.089
Detector resolution: 14.6199 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 3.1°
ω–scansh = −11→11
Absorption correction: multi-scan (REQAB; Jacobson, 1998)k = −11→11
Tmin = 0.678, Tmax = 1.000l = −8→9
5616 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.063Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.111H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.10w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0154P)2 + 14.9224P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1209 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
91 parametersΔρmax = 0.79 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.92 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Mo10.16945 (9)0.89946 (9)0.21937 (11)0.0186 (3)
Cu2−0.12230 (13)1.03150 (13)0.30706 (17)0.0205 (4)
N1−0.1618 (9)0.8217 (9)0.3090 (11)0.0226 (19)
H1A−0.14790.77980.21060.027*
H1B−0.10350.78150.41030.027*
O10.0784 (7)1.0015 (7)0.3471 (9)0.0212 (15)
N2−0.3317 (9)1.0540 (10)0.2586 (11)0.025 (2)
H2A−0.35051.07740.36250.030*
H2B−0.36511.12300.17580.030*
O20.3401 (7)0.8692 (8)0.3611 (10)0.0299 (18)
O30.1771 (9)0.9921 (8)0.0266 (10)0.036 (2)
O40.0827 (7)0.7333 (7)0.1511 (10)0.0258 (16)
C2−0.3985 (10)0.9178 (11)0.1886 (14)0.024 (2)
H2C−0.40210.90540.06300.029*
H2D−0.49300.91450.19620.029*
C1−0.3096 (11)0.8039 (12)0.3058 (16)0.031 (3)
H1C−0.31590.81000.42790.038*
H1D−0.34330.71230.25730.0387*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Mo10.0228 (5)0.0186 (4)0.0169 (4)−0.0027 (4)0.0104 (3)−0.0023 (4)
Cu20.0204 (7)0.0178 (6)0.0233 (7)0.0005 (5)0.0074 (5)0.0011 (5)
N10.022 (5)0.027 (5)0.019 (4)−0.001 (4)0.007 (4)0.003 (4)
O10.025 (4)0.022 (4)0.018 (4)0.003 (3)0.009 (3)−0.004 (3)
N20.025 (5)0.036 (5)0.015 (4)−0.003 (4)0.008 (4)−0.004 (4)
O20.018 (4)0.037 (5)0.033 (4)−0.001 (3)0.006 (3)−0.011 (4)
O30.055 (5)0.035 (5)0.023 (4)−0.012 (4)0.022 (4)−0.003 (4)
O40.026 (4)0.022 (4)0.026 (4)−0.006 (3)0.005 (3)−0.003 (3)
C20.012 (5)0.033 (6)0.030 (6)−0.005 (4)0.008 (4)0.000 (5)
C10.026 (6)0.036 (7)0.034 (6)0.001 (5)0.014 (5)0.013 (5)
Mo1—O21.739 (7)N1—H1A0.9000
Mo1—O31.740 (7)N1—H1B0.9000
Mo1—O41.789 (7)N2—C21.471 (13)
Mo1—O11.803 (6)N2—H2A0.9000
Cu2—O11.947 (7)N2—H2B0.9000
Cu2—O4i1.951 (7)O4—Cu2iv1.951 (7)
Cu2—O1Aii2.574 (7)C2—C11.505 (15)
Cu2—O3Aiii2.460 (7)C2—H2C0.9600
Cu2—N22.014 (8)C2—H2D0.9600
Cu2—N12.020 (9)C1—H1C0.9600
N1—C11.473 (13)C1—H1D0.9600
O2—Mo1—O3109.1 (4)C2—N2—Cu2107.6 (6)
O2—Mo1—O4109.4 (3)C2—N2—H2A110.2
O3—Mo1—O4109.5 (3)Cu2—N2—H2A110.2
O2—Mo1—O1107.8 (3)C2—N2—H2B110.2
O3—Mo1—O1110.7 (3)Cu2—N2—H2B110.2
O4—Mo1—O1110.4 (3)H2A—N2—H2B108.5
O1—Cu2—O4i88.3 (3)Mo1—O4—Cu2iv138.7 (4)
O1—Cu2—N2177.3 (3)N2—C2—C1106.7 (9)
O4i—Cu2—N294.2 (3)N2—C2—H2C110.4
O1—Cu2—N192.8 (3)C1—C2—H2C110.4
O4i—Cu2—N1170.2 (3)N2—C2—H2D110.4
N2—Cu2—N184.9 (3)C1—C2—H2D110.4
C1—N1—Cu2107.9 (6)H2C—C2—H2D108.6
C1—N1—H1A110.1N1—C1—C2109.3 (8)
Cu2—N1—H1A110.1N1—C1—H1C109.8
C1—N1—H1B110.1C2—C1—H1C109.8
Cu2—N1—H1B110.1N1—C1—H1D109.8
H1A—N1—H1B108.4C2—C1—H1D109.8
Mo1—O1—Cu2130.8 (4)H1C—C1—H1D108.3
O1—Cu2—N1—C1172.4 (6)O4i—Cu2—N2—C2170.1 (6)
O4i—Cu2—N1—C176 (2)N1—Cu2—N2—C2−19.7 (6)
N2—Cu2—N1—C1−9.1 (7)O2—Mo1—O4—Cu2iv1.6 (7)
O2—Mo1—O1—Cu2−161.3 (5)O3—Mo1—O4—Cu2iv121.0 (6)
O3—Mo1—O1—Cu279.4 (5)O1—Mo1—O4—Cu2iv−116.8 (6)
O4—Mo1—O1—Cu2−42.0 (6)Cu2—N2—C2—C143.7 (9)
O4i—Cu2—O1—Mo1−133.4 (5)Cu2—N1—C1—C236.0 (10)
N1—Cu2—O1—Mo156.3 (5)N2—C2—C1—N1−53.4 (11)
O1—Cu2—N2—C214 (7)
Table 1

Selected bond lengths (Å)

Mo1—O21.739 (7)
Mo1—O31.740 (7)
Mo1—O41.789 (7)
Mo1—O11.803 (6)
Cu2—O11.947 (7)
Cu2—O4i1.951 (7)
Cu2—O1Aii2.574 (7)
Cu2—O3Aiii2.460 (7)
Cu2—N22.014 (8)
Cu2—N12.020 (9)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  2 in total

1.  A Survey of Applications of Polyoxometalates.

Authors:  Dimitris E. Katsoulis
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  1998-02-05       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.