Literature DB >> 21200915

5,5'-(p-Phenyl-ene)di-1H-tetra-zole.

Xiang He1, Bao-Li An, Ming-Xing Li.   

Abstract

Crystals of the title organic compound, C(8)H(6)N(8), were generated in situ through the [2 + 3]-cyclo-addition reaction involving the precursor 1,4-dicyano-benzene and azide in water with Zn(2+) as Lewis acid. The asymmetric unit consists of one half-mol-ecule, and a twofold axis of symmetry passes through the centre of the benzene ring. There is an inter-molecular N-H⋯N hydrogen bond. The mol-ecules are assembled into a three-dimensional supra-molecular framework by π-π stacking inter-actions, with a perpendicular distance of 3.256 Å [centroid-centroid = 3.9731 (8) Å] between two tetra-zole ring planes, and 3.382 Å between the benz-ene ring and tetra-zole ring planes [centroid-centroid = 3.5010 (9) Å].

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 21200915      PMCID: PMC2919293          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807062538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related literature, see: Demko & Sharpless (2001 ▶, 2002 ▶); Furmeier & Metzger (2003 ▶); Huang et al. (2005 ▶); Wang et al. (2005 ▶); Xiong et al. (2002 ▶); Ye et al. (2005 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H6N8 M = 214.21 Monoclinic, a = 4.5396 (4) Å b = 9.8219 (10) Å c = 9.7525 (10) Å β = 92.910 (5)° V = 434.28 (7) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.12 mm−1 T = 293 (2) K 0.70 × 0.12 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Siemens SMART CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Siemens, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.701, T max = 1.000 (expected range = 0.693–0.988) 3228 measured reflections 985 independent reflections 830 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.037

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.036 wR(F 2) = 0.106 S = 1.07 985 reflections 73 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.26 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.23 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1996 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Siemens, 1996 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2000 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807062538/at2504sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807062538/at2504Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H6N8F(000) = 220
Mr = 214.21Dx = 1.638 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 1058 reflections
a = 4.5396 (4) Åθ = 4.2–27.5°
b = 9.8219 (10) ŵ = 0.12 mm1
c = 9.7525 (10) ÅT = 293 K
β = 92.910 (5)°Prism, colourless
V = 434.28 (7) Å30.70 × 0.12 × 0.10 mm
Z = 2
Siemens SMART CCD diffractometer985 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube830 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.037
Detector resolution: ω pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 4.2°
dtprofit.ref scansh = −5→5
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Siemens, 1996)k = −12→10
Tmin = 0.701, Tmax = 1.000l = −12→12
3228 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.106H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.07w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0565P)2 + 0.0841P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
985 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
73 parametersΔρmax = 0.26 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.23 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.2260 (3)0.63240 (12)0.42296 (11)0.0191 (3)
N20.2387 (3)0.62431 (12)0.55599 (11)0.0188 (3)
C9−0.0803 (3)0.78246 (13)0.49215 (12)0.0138 (3)
C6−0.2968 (3)0.89304 (13)0.49702 (12)0.0142 (3)
C7−0.5995 (3)1.04419 (14)0.62493 (13)0.0167 (3)
H7A−0.66621.07380.70850.020*
C8−0.3988 (3)0.93858 (14)0.62200 (13)0.0167 (3)
H8A−0.33120.89750.70360.020*
N40.0286 (3)0.73052 (11)0.37995 (11)0.0166 (3)
N30.0463 (3)0.71737 (11)0.60025 (11)0.0159 (3)
H3A0.01080.73240.68470.019*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0222 (7)0.0192 (6)0.0159 (6)0.0010 (5)0.0004 (5)−0.0008 (4)
N20.0221 (7)0.0176 (6)0.0167 (6)0.0014 (5)0.0015 (5)−0.0015 (4)
C90.0145 (7)0.0150 (7)0.0118 (6)−0.0047 (5)−0.0007 (5)0.0003 (4)
C60.0141 (6)0.0150 (6)0.0133 (6)−0.0033 (5)−0.0009 (5)0.0007 (5)
C70.0199 (7)0.0198 (7)0.0105 (6)−0.0001 (6)0.0014 (5)−0.0007 (5)
C80.0190 (7)0.0197 (7)0.0113 (6)−0.0002 (5)−0.0010 (5)0.0027 (5)
N40.0190 (6)0.0179 (6)0.0129 (5)0.0002 (5)0.0000 (4)−0.0006 (4)
N30.0194 (6)0.0172 (6)0.0112 (5)0.0008 (5)0.0012 (4)−0.0002 (4)
N1—N21.2982 (16)C6—C81.3991 (18)
N1—N41.3674 (16)C7—C81.3819 (19)
N2—N31.3499 (16)C7—C6i1.3997 (17)
C9—N41.3256 (17)C7—H7A0.9300
C9—N31.3376 (16)C8—H8A0.9300
C9—C61.4672 (18)N3—H3A0.8600
C6—C7i1.3997 (17)
N2—N1—N4110.17 (11)C8—C7—H7A119.8
N1—N2—N3106.36 (10)C6i—C7—H7A119.8
N4—C9—N3107.65 (12)C7—C8—C6120.38 (12)
N4—C9—C6126.17 (11)C7—C8—H8A119.8
N3—C9—C6126.17 (12)C6—C8—H8A119.8
C7i—C6—C8119.18 (13)C9—N4—N1106.51 (10)
C7i—C6—C9119.70 (12)C9—N3—N2109.31 (11)
C8—C6—C9121.11 (12)C9—N3—H3A125.3
C8—C7—C6i120.44 (12)N2—N3—H3A125.3
N4—N1—N2—N30.39 (14)C9—C6—C8—C7179.05 (12)
N4—C9—C6—C7i−1.7 (2)N3—C9—N4—N1−0.25 (15)
N3—C9—C6—C7i177.09 (13)C6—C9—N4—N1178.76 (12)
N4—C9—C6—C8179.24 (13)N2—N1—N4—C9−0.09 (15)
N3—C9—C6—C8−1.9 (2)N4—C9—N3—N20.50 (15)
C6i—C7—C8—C60.0 (2)C6—C9—N3—N2−178.51 (12)
C7i—C6—C8—C70.0 (2)N1—N2—N3—C9−0.55 (15)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N3—H3A···N4ii0.861.942.7805 (15)167
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N3—H3A⋯N4i0.861.942.7805 (15)167

Symmetry code: (i) .

  4 in total

1.  An intramolecular [2 + 3] cycloaddition route to fused 5-heterosubstituted tetrazoles.

Authors:  Z P Demko; K B Sharpless
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2001-12-13       Impact factor: 6.005

2.  Novel, acentric metal-organic coordination polymers from hydrothermal reactions involving in situ ligand synthesis.

Authors:  Ren-Gen Xiong; Xiang Xue; Hong Zhao; Xiao-Zeng You; Brendan F Abrahams; Ziling Xue
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2002-10-18       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Strong enhancement of second-harmonic generation (SHG) response through multi-chiral centers and metal-coordination.

Authors:  Qiong Ye; Yu-Zhi Tang; Xi-Sen Wang; Ren-Gen Xiong
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2005-04-11       Impact factor: 4.390

4.  A click chemistry approach to tetrazoles by Huisgen 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition: synthesis of 5-sulfonyl tetrazoles from azides and sulfonyl cyanides.

Authors:  Zachary P Demko; K Barry Sharpless
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2002-06-17       Impact factor: 15.336

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Ethane-1,2-diaminium bis-{5-[4-(1H-tetra-zol-5-yl)phen-yl]tetra-zolide} dihydrate.

Authors:  Chun-Rong Li; Zheng-Qiang Xia
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-08-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.