Literature DB >> 21200751

Redetermination of 4-hydroxy-benzaldehyde.

Jerry P Jasinski, Ray J Butcher, B Narayana, M T Swamy, H S Yathirajan.   

Abstract

This is a redetermination of the structure of the title compound, C(7)H(6)O(2), which was first reported by Iwasaki [Acta Cryst. (1977 ▶), B33, 1646-1648]. The results are obtained with greater precision in the present study. Crystal packing is stabilized by inter-molecular O-H⋯O inter-actions between the hydroxyl and aldehyde groups which link the mol-ecules into chains in a zigzag pattern along the [110] plane of the unit cell.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 21200751      PMCID: PMC2915250          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807063659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the previous structure determination, see: Iwasaki (1977 ▶). Forrelated structures, see: Matos Beja et al. (1997 ▶, 2000 ▶); Paixão et al. (2000 ▶); Silva et al. (2004 ▶). For related literature, see: Antonucci (1978 ▶); Bigi et al. (1999 ▶); Dean (1963 ▶); Samal et al. (1999 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H6O2 M = 122.12 Monoclinic, a = 6.6992 (8) Å b = 13.5550 (12) Å c = 7.1441 (11) Å β = 112.871 (16)° V = 597.74 (15) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.10 mm−1 T = 296 (2) K 0.49 × 0.37 × 0.24 mm

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Gemini R CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2007 ▶) T min = 0.949, T max = 0.970 3559 measured reflections 1170 independent reflections 841 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.022

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.038 wR(F 2) = 0.117 S = 1.06 1170 reflections 86 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.13 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.18 e Å−3 Data collection: CrysAlisPro (Oxford Diffraction, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlisPro; data reduction: CrysAlisPro; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2000 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807063659/lx2042sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807063659/lx2042Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H6O2F000 = 256
Mr = 122.12Dx = 1.357 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMelting point = 385–387 K
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcMo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 6.6992 (8) ÅCell parameters from 1669 reflections
b = 13.5550 (12) Åθ = 5.3–29.0º
c = 7.1441 (11) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
β = 112.871 (16)ºT = 296 (2) K
V = 597.74 (15) Å3Chunk, colourless
Z = 40.49 × 0.37 × 0.24 mm
Oxford Diffraction Gemini R CCD diffractometer1170 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube841 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.022
Detector resolution: 10.5081 pixels mm-1θmax = 26.0º
T = 296(2) Kθmin = 5.5º
φ and ω scansh = −8→8
Absorption correction: multi-scan(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2007)k = −15→16
Tmin = 0.949, Tmax = 0.970l = −8→8
3559 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.117  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.068P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.06(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1170 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.13 e Å3
86 parametersΔρmin = −0.18 e Å3
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction correction: none
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.1345 (2)0.72809 (8)0.1335 (2)0.0652 (4)
H10.016 (4)0.7359 (17)0.140 (3)0.092 (8)*
O20.2691 (2)0.26982 (8)0.3786 (2)0.0633 (4)
C10.1834 (2)0.63218 (11)0.1834 (2)0.0458 (4)
C20.3718 (2)0.59530 (11)0.1700 (2)0.0499 (4)
H20.45870.63590.12840.060*
C30.4277 (2)0.49829 (11)0.2187 (2)0.0465 (4)
H30.55420.47400.21120.056*
C40.2990 (2)0.43542 (11)0.2793 (2)0.0417 (4)
C50.1100 (2)0.47379 (11)0.2921 (2)0.0452 (4)
H50.02180.43300.33170.054*
C60.0543 (2)0.57089 (11)0.2467 (2)0.0470 (4)
H6−0.06980.59590.25810.056*
C70.3667 (3)0.33405 (12)0.3294 (2)0.0509 (4)
H70.49810.31610.32350.061*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0635 (8)0.0422 (7)0.1018 (10)0.0034 (6)0.0451 (7)0.0091 (6)
O20.0586 (7)0.0434 (7)0.0917 (9)−0.0019 (5)0.0332 (7)0.0049 (6)
C10.0463 (8)0.0385 (8)0.0547 (9)−0.0030 (6)0.0219 (7)−0.0039 (7)
C20.0472 (9)0.0463 (9)0.0636 (10)−0.0078 (7)0.0297 (8)−0.0039 (7)
C30.0372 (7)0.0483 (9)0.0582 (9)−0.0026 (6)0.0231 (7)−0.0089 (7)
C40.0396 (8)0.0404 (8)0.0447 (8)−0.0013 (6)0.0157 (6)−0.0058 (6)
C50.0417 (8)0.0450 (9)0.0536 (9)−0.0050 (7)0.0235 (7)−0.0012 (7)
C60.0404 (8)0.0466 (9)0.0593 (9)0.0020 (7)0.0252 (7)−0.0018 (7)
C70.0430 (8)0.0455 (9)0.0648 (10)−0.0012 (7)0.0217 (8)−0.0055 (7)
O1—C11.354 (2)C3—H30.9300
O1—H10.82 (3)C4—C51.404 (2)
O2—C71.219 (2)C4—C71.448 (2)
C1—C21.395 (2)C5—C61.372 (2)
C1—C61.395 (2)C5—H50.9300
C2—C31.374 (2)C6—H60.9300
C2—H20.9300C7—H70.9300
C3—C41.395 (2)
C1—O1—H1104.4 (16)C3—C4—C7118.98 (13)
O1—C1—C2117.30 (14)C5—C4—C7122.62 (13)
O1—C1—C6122.68 (14)C6—C5—C4120.61 (13)
C2—C1—C6120.02 (14)C6—C5—H5119.7
C3—C2—C1119.35 (14)C4—C5—H5119.7
C3—C2—H2120.3C5—C6—C1120.12 (14)
C1—C2—H2120.3C5—C6—H6119.9
C2—C3—C4121.50 (14)C1—C6—H6119.9
C2—C3—H3119.3O2—C7—C4126.70 (15)
C4—C3—H3119.3O2—C7—H7116.7
C3—C4—C5118.39 (13)C4—C7—H7116.7
O1—C1—C2—C3−179.85 (14)C7—C4—C5—C6178.77 (14)
C6—C1—C2—C30.3 (2)C4—C5—C6—C11.2 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C40.7 (2)O1—C1—C6—C5178.90 (14)
C2—C3—C4—C5−0.8 (2)C2—C1—C6—C5−1.2 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C7−179.78 (14)C3—C4—C7—O2−177.67 (15)
C3—C4—C5—C6−0.2 (2)C5—C4—C7—O23.4 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···O2i0.82 (3)1.92 (3)2.731 (2)171 (2)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯O2i0.82 (3)1.92 (3)2.731 (2)171 (2)

Symmetry code: (i) .

  4 in total

1.  2-bromo-5-hydroxybenzaldehyde

Authors: 
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.172

2.  3-Hydroxybenzaldehyde.

Authors:  J A Paixão; A Matos Beja; M Ramos Silva; L Alte Da Veiga; A C Serra
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.172

3.  Montmorillonite KSF as an Inorganic, Water Stable, and Reusable Catalyst for the Knoevenagel Synthesis of Coumarin-3-carboxylic Acids.

Authors:  Franca Bigi; Luca Chesini; Raimondo Maggi; Giovanni Sartori
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  1999-02-05       Impact factor: 4.354

4.  Aldehyde methacrylates derived from hydroxybenzaldehydes.

Authors:  J M Antonucci
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 6.116

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.