Literature DB >> 21200734

1,1'-(Butane-1,4-di-yl)diimidazolium dinitrate.

Shouwen Jin, Daqi Wang.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(10)H(16)N(4) (2+)·2NO(3) (-), the organic cation is located around an inversion centre. The imidazolium ring forms a dihedral angle of 62.7 (3)° with the plane defined by the C atoms of the -(CH(2))(4)- aliphatic linker. Two anions bind to the cation via three-centre N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds and thus discrete hydrogen-bonded ion triples are formed. The nitrate is approximately coplanar with the imidazolium ring to which it binds.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 21200734      PMCID: PMC2915236          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807063751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related literature, see: Gould (1986 ▶); Holman et al. (2001 ▶); Jin & Chen (2007a ▶,b ▶); Jin et al. (2007 ▶); Królikowska & Garbarczyk (2005 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C10H16N4 2+·2NO3 − M = 316.29 Monoclinic, a = 7.788 (2) Å b = 10.482 (3) Å c = 9.363 (3) Å β = 110.649 (4)° V = 715.3 (4) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.12 mm−1 T = 298 (2) K 0.43 × 0.40 × 0.31 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.949, T max = 0.963 3629 measured reflections 1257 independent reflections 913 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.036

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.040 wR(F 2) = 0.115 S = 1.06 1257 reflections 100 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.21 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1997 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1997 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2001 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807063751/gk2116sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807063751/gk2116Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H16N42+·2NO3F000 = 332
Mr = 316.29Dx = 1.469 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 1224 reflections
a = 7.788 (2) Åθ = 2.8–24.0º
b = 10.482 (3) ŵ = 0.12 mm1
c = 9.363 (3) ÅT = 298 (2) K
β = 110.649 (4)ºBlock, colourless
V = 715.3 (4) Å30.43 × 0.40 × 0.31 mm
Z = 2
Bruker SMART APEXII CCD diffractometer1257 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube913 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.036
T = 298(2) Kθmax = 25.0º
φ and ω scansθmin = 2.9º
Absorption correction: multi-scan(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −9→9
Tmin = 0.949, Tmax = 0.963k = −12→10
3629 measured reflectionsl = −11→8
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.115  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0497P)2 + 0.1767P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.06(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1257 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.21 e Å3
100 parametersΔρmin = −0.20 e Å3
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction correction: none
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.6076 (2)0.66149 (16)0.79775 (17)0.0408 (4)
N20.5677 (2)0.72628 (16)1.00094 (19)0.0483 (5)
H20.56700.72811.09250.058*
N30.6173 (2)0.84419 (17)0.3487 (2)0.0458 (5)
O10.6683 (3)0.92237 (15)0.27403 (18)0.0673 (5)
O20.5460 (2)0.74148 (15)0.28855 (17)0.0623 (5)
O30.6379 (3)0.86529 (19)0.4822 (2)0.0934 (7)
C10.6268 (3)0.6310 (2)0.9390 (2)0.0465 (5)
H10.67440.55460.98720.056*
C20.5079 (3)0.8216 (2)0.8959 (2)0.0472 (5)
H2A0.45900.89960.90980.057*
C30.5331 (3)0.78137 (19)0.7687 (2)0.0440 (5)
H30.50510.82640.67780.053*
C40.6486 (3)0.5788 (2)0.6874 (2)0.0509 (6)
H4A0.70790.50160.73850.061*
H4B0.73320.62230.64880.061*
C50.4777 (3)0.54372 (19)0.5556 (2)0.0423 (5)
H5A0.41950.62070.50300.051*
H5B0.39200.50140.59410.051*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0393 (9)0.0461 (10)0.0335 (9)−0.0006 (8)0.0086 (7)−0.0054 (7)
N20.0578 (12)0.0535 (11)0.0342 (9)−0.0049 (9)0.0167 (8)−0.0053 (8)
N30.0479 (10)0.0514 (11)0.0390 (10)0.0031 (9)0.0168 (8)0.0011 (9)
O10.0972 (14)0.0527 (10)0.0581 (10)−0.0080 (9)0.0349 (10)0.0098 (8)
O20.0810 (12)0.0549 (10)0.0557 (10)−0.0154 (9)0.0298 (9)−0.0085 (8)
O30.1370 (18)0.1073 (16)0.0490 (11)−0.0433 (14)0.0491 (11)−0.0251 (10)
C10.0503 (13)0.0439 (12)0.0398 (12)−0.0001 (10)0.0090 (10)−0.0012 (9)
C20.0500 (12)0.0408 (11)0.0470 (13)−0.0010 (10)0.0125 (10)−0.0054 (10)
C30.0470 (12)0.0419 (12)0.0390 (11)−0.0035 (10)0.0100 (9)0.0007 (9)
C40.0453 (13)0.0594 (14)0.0469 (13)0.0037 (11)0.0148 (10)−0.0142 (10)
C50.0407 (11)0.0446 (11)0.0409 (11)−0.0020 (9)0.0136 (9)−0.0062 (9)
N1—C11.317 (2)C2—C31.342 (3)
N1—C31.371 (3)C2—H2A0.9300
N1—C41.467 (2)C3—H30.9300
N2—C11.316 (3)C4—C51.507 (3)
N2—C21.364 (3)C4—H4A0.9700
N2—H20.8600C4—H4B0.9700
N3—O31.223 (2)C5—C5i1.518 (4)
N3—O11.231 (2)C5—H5A0.9700
N3—O21.251 (2)C5—H5B0.9700
C1—H10.9300
C1—N1—C3108.15 (16)C2—C3—N1107.24 (18)
C1—N1—C4126.02 (18)C2—C3—H3126.4
C3—N1—C4125.73 (17)N1—C3—H3126.4
C1—N2—C2108.78 (18)N1—C4—C5111.83 (16)
C1—N2—H2125.6N1—C4—H4A109.3
C2—N2—H2125.6C5—C4—H4A109.3
O3—N3—O1120.54 (19)N1—C4—H4B109.3
O3—N3—O2119.56 (18)C5—C4—H4B109.3
O1—N3—O2119.90 (18)H4A—C4—H4B107.9
N2—C1—N1108.97 (18)C4—C5—C5i111.1 (2)
N2—C1—H1125.5C4—C5—H5A109.4
N1—C1—H1125.5C5i—C5—H5A109.4
C3—C2—N2106.86 (19)C4—C5—H5B109.4
C3—C2—H2A126.6C5i—C5—H5B109.4
N2—C2—H2A126.6H5A—C5—H5B108.0
C2—N2—C1—N10.1 (2)C1—N1—C3—C2−0.1 (2)
C3—N1—C1—N20.0 (2)C4—N1—C3—C2176.60 (18)
C4—N1—C1—N2−176.70 (17)C1—N1—C4—C5113.5 (2)
C1—N2—C2—C3−0.2 (2)C3—N1—C4—C5−62.7 (3)
N2—C2—C3—N10.2 (2)N1—C4—C5—C5i−179.0 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2···O1ii0.862.593.157 (2)124
N2—H2···O2ii0.861.902.762 (2)175
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N2—H2⋯O1i0.862.593.157 (2)124
N2—H2⋯O2i0.861.902.762 (2)175

Symmetry code: (i) .

  1 in total

1.  Metric engineering of soft molecular host frameworks.

Authors:  K T Holman; A M Pivovar; J A Swift; M D Ward
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 22.384

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.