Literature DB >> 21200349

Energy expenditure prediction using a miniaturized ear-worn sensor.

Louis Atallah1, Julian J H Leong, Benny Lo, Guang-Zhong Yang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to predict human energy expenditure and activity type using a miniature lightweight ear-worn inertia sensor and a novel pattern recognition algorithm for activity detection.
METHODS: This study used a protocol of 11 activities of daily living: lying down, standing, computer work, vacuuming, stairs, slow walking, brisk walking, slow running, fast running, cycling, and rowing. Subjects included 25 healthy randomized subjects (18 males and 7 females). Each participant wore the ear sensor to record posture and linear acceleration, as well as the Cosmed K4b system for indirect calorimetry. The main outcome measure was the continuous energy expenditure per minute prediction for both task-known and task-blind estimation.
RESULTS: The values for METs predicted using the proposed algorithm and the measured METs using the K4b showed good agreement with low values for the systematic bias (lying down=0.01, standing=-0.02, computer work=-0.04, vacuuming=-0.17, stairs=-0.02, slow walking=0.01, fast walking=0.04, slow running=0.14, fast running=-0.35, cycling=0.32, and rowing=0.10). For task-blind prediction, the agreement between predicted and measured METs is also good with low values of the systematic bias (lying down=0.11, standing=0.14, computer work=-0.06, vacuuming=0.47, stairs=-0.47, slow walking=0.53, fast walking=-0.11, slow running=0.83, fast running=-1.18, cycling=0.31, and rowing=-0.67). Activity is also well predicted (for task-blind prediction) with an overall success rate of 88.99% and individual correct classification rates of lying down=89.62%, standing/computer work=99.10%, vacuuming=76.60%, stairs=89.13%, walking=85.11%, running=98.96%, and cycling=79.79%.
CONCLUSIONS: The ear-worn sensor presented in this work is a novel lightweight device that can be used to predict energy expenditure for a range of activities without behavior interference or modification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21200349     DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182093014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  4 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of human energy expenditure, with particular reference to field studies: an historical perspective.

Authors:  Roy J Shephard; Yukitoshi Aoyagi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Validity of activity monitors in health and chronic disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hans Van Remoortel; Santiago Giavedoni; Yogini Raste; Chris Burtin; Zafeiris Louvaris; Elena Gimeno-Santos; Daniel Langer; Alastair Glendenning; Nicholas S Hopkinson; Ioannis Vogiatzis; Barry T Peterson; Frederick Wilson; Bridget Mann; Roberto Rabinovich; Milo A Puhan; Thierry Troosters
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 6.457

3.  Validation of an ear-worn sensor for gait monitoring using a force-plate instrumented treadmill.

Authors:  Louis Atallah; Anatole Wiik; Gareth G Jones; Benny Lo; Justin P Cobb; Andrew Amis; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 4.  A systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults: a DEDIPAC study.

Authors:  Kieran P Dowd; Robert Szeklicki; Marco Alessandro Minetto; Marie H Murphy; Angela Polito; Ezio Ghigo; Hidde van der Ploeg; Ulf Ekelund; Janusz Maciaszek; Rafal Stemplewski; Maciej Tomczak; Alan E Donnelly
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 6.457

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.