Literature DB >> 21200034

Using proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate to classify risk in patients with chronic kidney disease: a cohort study.

Marcello Tonelli1, Paul Muntner, Anita Lloyd, Braden J Manns, Matthew T James, Scott Klarenbach, Robert R Quinn, Natasha Wiebe, Brenda R Hemmelgarn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The staging system for chronic kidney disease relies almost exclusively on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), although proteinuria is also associated with adverse outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To validate a 5-category system for risk stratification based on the combination of eGFR and proteinuria.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: A provincial laboratory registry in Alberta, Canada, and a representative sample of noninstitutionalized U.S. adults. PATIENTS: A derivation data set of 474 521 adult outpatients, 2 independent internal validation cohorts with 51 356 and 460 623 patients, and an external validation cohort of 14 358 patients. MEASUREMENTS: Glomerular filtration rate, estimated by using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation, and proteinuria, measured by using urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio or dipstick urinalysis. Outcomes included all-cause mortality and a composite renal outcome of kidney failure or doubling of serum creatinine level.
RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 38 months in the internal validation cohorts, higher risk categories (indicating lower eGFR or more proteinuria) were associated with a graded increase in the risk for the composite renal outcome. The projected number of U.S. adults assigned to risk categories 3 and 4 in the alternate system was 3.9 million, compared with 16.3 million assigned to stage 3 and 4 in the current staging system. The alternate system was more likely to correctly reclassify persons who did not develop the renal outcome than those who did, although some persons developed the renal outcome despite reclassification to a lower category. However, all analyses of patients reclassified to a lower category showed that substantially fewer such patients developed the renal outcome than did not. Correct reclassification by the alternate system was more likely when proteinuria was measured by using albumin-to-creatinine ratio than with dipstick testing, and also more likely for the composite renal outcome than for mortality. LIMITATION: The study had a short follow-up time.
CONCLUSION: Using proteinuria in combination with eGFR may reduce unnecessary referrals for care at the cost of not referring or delaying referral for some patients who go on to develop kidney failure. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research interdisciplinary research team grant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21200034     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-1-201101040-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  69 in total

Review 1.  Renal disease in HIV-infected individuals.

Authors:  John Phair; Frank Palella
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.283

2.  Online clinical pathway for managing adults with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Craig Curtis; Carlee Balint; Yazid N Al Hamarneh; Maoliosa Donald; Ross T Tsuyuki; Kerry McBrien; Wes Jackson; Brenda Hemmelgarn
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2015-09

3.  Galectin-3 and new-onset CKD: marker or mediator?

Authors:  Pietro Ravani; Brendan J Barrett
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Chronic kidney disease: Staging CKD: can we rely on estimated GFRs?

Authors:  Piero Ruggenenti; Giuseppe Remuzzi
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 28.314

5.  Is it time to evolve past the prerenal azotemia versus acute tubular necrosis classification?

Authors:  Justin M Belcher; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Evidence-Based Decision Making 6: Administrative Databases as Secondary Data Source for Epidemiologic and Health Service Research.

Authors:  Tanvir Turin Chowdhury; Brenda R Hemmelgarn
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

Review 7.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Emelia J Benjamin; Michael J Blaha; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Sandeep R Das; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; James Floyd; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Rachel H Mackey; Kunihiro Matsushita; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Comilla Sasson; Amytis Towfighi; Connie W Tsao; Melanie B Turner; Salim S Virani; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Is it AKI or nonrecovery of renal function that is important for long-term outcomes?

Authors:  Steven G Coca
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 9.  Chronic kidney disease as a coronary artery disease risk equivalent.

Authors:  Alexandrios Briasoulis; George L Bakris
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Geographic variation in CKD prevalence and ESRD incidence in the United States: results from the reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke (REGARDS) study.

Authors:  Rikki M Tanner; Orlando M Gutiérrez; Suzanne Judd; William McClellan; C Barrett Bowling; Brian D Bradbury; Monika M Safford; Mary Cushman; David Warnock; Paul Muntner
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 8.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.