OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of pediatric primary care interventions on parent-child interactions in families with low socioeconomic status. DESIGN: In this randomized controlled trial, participants were randomized to 1 of 2 interventions (Video Interaction Project [VIP] or Building Blocks [BB]) or the control group. SETTING:Urban public hospital pediatric primary care clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Mother-newborn dyads enrolled post partum from November 1, 2005, through October 31, 2008. INTERVENTIONS: In the VIP group, mothers and newborns participated in 1-on-1 sessions with a child development specialist who facilitated interactions in play and shared reading by reviewing videos made of the parent and child on primary care visit days; learning materials and parenting pamphlets were also provided. In the BB group, parenting materials, including age-specific newsletters suggesting interactive activities, learning materials, and parent-completed developmental questionnaires, were mailed to the mothers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Parent-child interactions were assessed at 6 months with the StimQ-Infant and a 24-hour shared reading recall diary. RESULTS:A total of 410 families were assessed. The VIP group had a higher increased StimQ score (mean difference, 3.6 points; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 5.6 points; Cohen d, 0.51; 0.22 to 0.81) and more reading activities compared to the control group. The BB group also had an increased overall StimQ score compared with the control group (Cohen d, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 0.60). The greatest effects for the VIP group were found for mothers with a ninth-grade or higher reading level (Cohen d, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.33 to 1.03). CONCLUSIONS: The VIP and BB groups each led to increased parent-child interactions. Pediatric primary care represents a significant opportunity for enhancing developmental trajectories in at-risk children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00212576.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of pediatric primary care interventions on parent-child interactions in families with low socioeconomic status. DESIGN: In this randomized controlled trial, participants were randomized to 1 of 2 interventions (Video Interaction Project [VIP] or Building Blocks [BB]) or the control group. SETTING: Urban public hospital pediatric primary care clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Mother-newborn dyads enrolled post partum from November 1, 2005, through October 31, 2008. INTERVENTIONS: In the VIP group, mothers and newborns participated in 1-on-1 sessions with a child development specialist who facilitated interactions in play and shared reading by reviewing videos made of the parent and child on primary care visit days; learning materials and parenting pamphlets were also provided. In the BB group, parenting materials, including age-specific newsletters suggesting interactive activities, learning materials, and parent-completed developmental questionnaires, were mailed to the mothers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Parent-child interactions were assessed at 6 months with the StimQ-Infant and a 24-hour shared reading recall diary. RESULTS: A total of 410 families were assessed. The VIP group had a higher increased StimQ score (mean difference, 3.6 points; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 5.6 points; Cohen d, 0.51; 0.22 to 0.81) and more reading activities compared to the control group. The BB group also had an increased overall StimQ score compared with the control group (Cohen d, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 0.60). The greatest effects for the VIP group were found for mothers with a ninth-grade or higher reading level (Cohen d, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.33 to 1.03). CONCLUSIONS: The VIP and BB groups each led to increased parent-child interactions. Pediatric primary care represents a significant opportunity for enhancing developmental trajectories in at-risk children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00212576.
Authors: Alan L Mendelsohn; Benard P Dreyer; Virginia Flynn; Suzy Tomopoulos; Irene Rovira; Wendy Tineo; Charissa Pebenito; Carmen Torres; Heidi Torres; Abigail F Nixon Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 2.225
Authors: A L Mendelsohn; L N Mogilner; B P Dreyer; J A Forman; S C Weinstein; M Broderick; K J Cheng; T Magloire; T Moore; C Napier Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Cynthia S Minkovitz; Nancy Hughart; Donna Strobino; Dan Scharfstein; Holly Grason; William Hou; Tess Miller; David Bishai; Marilyn Augustyn; Kathryn Taaffe McLearn; Bernard Guyer Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-12-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Bergen B Nelson; Rebecca N Dudovitz; Tumaini R Coker; Elizabeth S Barnert; Christopher Biely; Ning Li; Peter G Szilagyi; Kandyce Larson; Neal Halfon; Frederick J Zimmerman; Paul J Chung Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Andrew F Beck; Alicia J Cohen; Jeffrey D Colvin; Caroline M Fichtenberg; Eric W Fleegler; Arvin Garg; Laura M Gottlieb; Matthew S Pantell; Megan T Sandel; Adam Schickedanz; Robert S Kahn Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Candice Taylor Lucas; Mary Jo Messito; Rachel S Gross; Suzy Tomopoulos; Arthur H Fierman; Carolyn Brockmeyer Cates; Samantha Berkule Johnson; Benard Dreyer; Alan L Mendelsohn Journal: J Nutr Educ Behav Date: 2016-10-15 Impact factor: 3.045