Literature DB >> 21199972

Use of medical imaging procedures with ionizing radiation in children: a population-based study.

Adam L Dorfman1, Reza Fazel, Andrew J Einstein, Kimberly E Applegate, Harlan M Krumholz, Yongfei Wang, Emmanuel Christodoulou, Jersey Chen, Ramon Sanchez, Brahmajee K Nallamothu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine population-based rates of the use of diagnostic imaging procedures with ionizing radiation in children, stratified by age and sex.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis.
SETTING: All settings using imaging procedures with ionizing radiation. PATIENTS: Individuals younger than 18 years, alive, and continuously enrolled in UnitedHealthcare between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2007, in 5 large US health care markets. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number and type of diagnostic imaging procedures using ionizing radiation in children.
RESULTS: A total of 355 088 children were identified; 436 711 imaging procedures using ionizing radiation were performed in 150 930 patients (42.5%). The highest rates of use were in children older than 10 years, with frequent use in infants younger than 2 years as well. Plain radiography accounted for 84.7% of imaging procedures performed. Computed tomographic scans-associated with substantially higher doses of radiation-were commonly used, accounting for 11.9% of all procedures during the study period. Overall, 7.9% of children received at least 1 computed tomographic scan and 3.5% received 2 or more, with computed tomographic scans of the head being the most frequent.
CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to ionizing radiation from medical diagnostic imaging procedures may occur frequently among children. Efforts to optimize and ensure appropriate use of these procedures in the pediatric population should be encouraged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21199972      PMCID: PMC3686496          DOI: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med        ISSN: 1072-4710


  22 in total

1.  Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury.

Authors:  M J Haydel; C A Preston; T J Mills; S Luber; E Blaudeau; P M DeBlieux
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-13       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Has pediatric CT at children's hospitals reached its peak?

Authors:  Brent A Townsend; Michael J Callahan; David Zurakowski; George A Taylor
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Performance of a decision rule to predict need for computed tomography among children with blunt head trauma.

Authors:  Jennifer A Oman; Richelle J Cooper; James F Holmes; Peter Viccellio; Andrew Nyce; Steven E Ross; Jerome R Hoffman; William R Mower
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT.

Authors:  D Brenner; C Elliston; E Hall; W Berdon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Scandinavian guidelines for initial management of minimal, mild, and moderate head injuries. The Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee.

Authors:  T Ingebrigtsen; B Romner; C Kock-Jensen
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2000-04

6.  Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, Part I. Cancer: 1950-1990.

Authors:  D A Pierce; Y Shimizu; D L Preston; M Vaeth; K Mabuchi
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Cancer following cardiac catheterization in childhood.

Authors:  B Modan; L Keinan; T Blumstein; S Sadetzki
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  Radiation risk to children from computed tomography.

Authors:  Alan S Brody; Donald P Frush; Walter Huda; Robert L Brent
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  Eric J Hall
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-07-19

10.  Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998.

Authors:  D L Preston; E Ron; S Tokuoka; S Funamoto; N Nishi; M Soda; K Mabuchi; K Kodama
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.841

View more
  41 in total

1.  Privately insured medical patients are more likely to have a head CT.

Authors:  Emily M Fortin; Jerry Fisher; Sheng Qiu; Charlene Irvin Babcock
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-07-20

2.  Acute abdominal pain in children: usefulness of three-view abdominal radiographs in the emergency department.

Authors:  Lulu He; Ellen Park; Neil Vachhani; Esben Vogelius; Chakradhar Thupili; Unni Udayasankar
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-07-19

Review 3.  Computed tomographies and cancer risk in children: a literature overview of CT practices, risk estimations and an epidemiologic cohort study proposal.

Authors:  Lucian Krille; Hajo Zeeb; Andreas Jahnen; Peter Mildenberger; Michael Seidenbusch; Karl Schneider; Gerald Weisser; Gael Hammer; Peter Scholz; Maria Blettner
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Radiation Exposure from Medical Imaging: A Wake-up Call for Oman!

Authors:  Lamk Al-Lamki
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2011-02-12

Review 5.  CT dose and risk estimates in children.

Authors:  Donald P Frush
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17

Review 6.  Newer CT applications and their alternatives: what is appropriate in children?

Authors:  R Paul Guillerman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17

7.  Use and accuracy of diagnostic imaging in the evaluation of pediatric appendicitis.

Authors:  Meera Kotagal; Morgan K Richards; David R Flum; Stephanie P Acierno; Robert L Weinsheimer; Adam B Goldin
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  The Think A-Head campaign: an introduction to ImageGently 2.0.

Authors:  Donald P Frush; Lee S Benjamin; Nadia Kadom; Charles G Macias; Sally K Snow; Sarah J Gaskill; Emilee Palmer; Keith J Strauss
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-11-04

9.  Trends in CT scan rates in children and pregnant women: teaching, private, public and nonprofit facilities.

Authors:  Sumi Hoshiko; Daniel Smith; Cathyn Fan; Carrie R Jones; Sandra V McNeel; Ronald A Cohen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-02-14

10.  Physiological Recording in the MRI Environment (PRiME): MRI-Compatible Hemodynamic Recording System.

Authors:  John W Kakareka; Anthony Z Faranesh; Randall H Pursley; Adrienne Campbell-Washburn; Daniel A Herzka; Toby Rogers; Josh Kanter; Kanishka Ratnayaka; Robert J Lederman; Thomas J Pohida
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.