Literature DB >> 21199953

Continuous-time model of structural balance.

Seth A Marvel1, Jon Kleinberg, Robert D Kleinberg, Steven H Strogatz.   

Abstract

It is not uncommon for certain social networks to divide into two opposing camps in response to stress. This happens, for example, in networks of political parties during winner-takes-all elections, in networks of companies competing to establish technical standards, and in networks of nations faced with mounting threats of war. A simple model for these two-sided separations is the dynamical system dX/dt = X(2), where X is a matrix of the friendliness or unfriendliness between pairs of nodes in the network. Previous simulations suggested that only two types of behavior were possible for this system: Either all relationships become friendly or two hostile factions emerge. Here we prove that for generic initial conditions, these are indeed the only possible outcomes. Our analysis yields a closed-form expression for faction membership as a function of the initial conditions and implies that the initial amount of friendliness in large social networks (started from random initial conditions) determines whether they will end up in intractable conflict or global harmony.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21199953      PMCID: PMC3033300          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1013213108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  6 in total

1.  Structural balance: a generalization of Heider's theory.

Authors:  D CARTWRIGHT; F HARARY
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1956-09       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Intergroup contact theory.

Authors:  T F Pettigrew
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  Energy landscape of social balance.

Authors:  Seth A Marvel; Steven H Strogatz; Jon M Kleinberg
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Attitudes and cognitive organization.

Authors:  F HEIDER
Journal:  J Psychol       Date:  1946-01

5.  Dynamics of social balance on networks.

Authors:  T Antal; P L Krapivsky; S Redner
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2005-09-21

Review 6.  A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.

Authors:  Thomas F Pettigrew; Linda R Tropp
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2006-05
  6 in total
  23 in total

1.  Local balancing influences global structure in social networks.

Authors:  Aravind Srinivasan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Dynamics of Large Multi-View Social Networks: Synergy, Cannibalization and Cross-View Interplay.

Authors:  Yu Shi; Myunghwan Kim; Shaunak Chatterjee; Mitul Tiwari; Souvik Ghosh; Rómer Rosales
Journal:  KDD       Date:  2016-08

3.  A dynamical systems view of network centrality.

Authors:  Peter Grindrod; Desmond J Higham
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.704

4.  Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans.

Authors:  David G Rand; Samuel Arbesman; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Graph partitions and cluster synchronization in networks of oscillators.

Authors:  Michael T Schaub; Neave O'Clery; Yazan N Billeh; Jean-Charles Delvenne; Renaud Lambiotte; Mauricio Barahona
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.642

6.  Nonlinear control of networked dynamical systems.

Authors:  Megan Morrison; J Nathan Kutz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Netw Sci Eng       Date:  2020-10-19

7.  Dynamics of opinion forming in structurally balanced social networks.

Authors:  Claudio Altafini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  An evolutionary game approach for determination of the structural conflicts in signed networks.

Authors:  Shaolin Tan; Jinhu Lü
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Dynamical models explaining social balance and evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  Vincent Antonio Traag; Paul Van Dooren; Patrick De Leenheer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Predicting future conflict between team-members with parameter-free models of social networks.

Authors:  Núria Rovira-Asenjo; Tània Gumí; Marta Sales-Pardo; Roger Guimerà
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.