Literature DB >> 21199706

A novel prototype device for electroporation-enhanced DNA vaccine delivery simultaneously to both skin and muscle.

Feng Lin1, Xuefei Shen, Jay R McCoy, Janess M Mendoza, Jian Yan, Steve V Kemmerrer, Amir S Khan, David B Weiner, Kate E Broderick, Niranjan Y Sardesai.   

Abstract

Electroporation (EP) of either muscle or skin has proven to be an efficient method for increasing DNA-based vaccine delivery and immunogenicity in small and large animals. Previous comparative studies in large animals suggest that intramuscular (i.m.) DNA EP delivery appears to favor cellular immunity, while intradermal (i.d.) EP delivery may favor humoral immunity. While current EP devices are primarily designed either for i.m. or i.d. delivery, we developed a novel prototype Dual-Depth Device (DDD) for EP-mediated simultaneous i.d. and i.m. delivery of DNA-based vaccines with an attempt to elicit superior antibody and cellular immune responses. We performed comparisons of DDD EP delivery with standard i.d. EP, standard i.m. EP, and combined delivery of i.d. and i.m. EP at separate sites, for the ability to induce antigen-specific immune responses. In a guinea pig model using a SynCon™ DNA vaccine encoding the influenza virus H5 hemaglutinin (H5HA), vaccination via DDD or combined delivery induced higher antibody titers than via either i.d. or i.m. delivery alone. In a mouse model using a DNA vaccine encoding the nucleoprotein (NP) of influenza H1N1, the resulting trend of antibody responses was similar to that detected in guinea pig study. Importantly, cellular immune responses in the DDD or combined delivery groups were significantly stronger than that in either i.d. or i.m. delivery groups. We conclude that EP-mediated DNA-based vaccine delivery to both skin and muscle is superior to delivery to either tissue alone for induction of antigen-specific antibody and cellular immunity.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21199706     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.12.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  24 in total

1.  Intradermal DNA vaccination enhanced by low-current electroporation improves antigen expression and induces robust cellular and humoral immune responses.

Authors:  Natalie A Hutnick; Devin J F Myles; Bernadette Ferraro; Colleen Lucke; Feng Lin; Jian Yan; Kate E Broderick; Amir S Khan; Niranjian Y Sardesai; David B Weiner
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 5.695

2.  Comparison of intradermal and intramuscular delivery followed by in vivo electroporation of SIV Env DNA in macaques.

Authors:  Viraj Kulkarni; Margherita Rosati; Jenifer Bear; Guy R Pilkington; Rashmi Jalah; Cristina Bergamaschi; Ashish K Singh; Candido Alicea; Bhabadeb Chowdhury; Gen-Mu Zhang; Eun-Young Kim; Steven M Wolinsky; Wensheng Huang; Yongjun Guan; Celia LaBranche; David C Montefiori; Kate E Broderick; Niranjan Y Sardesai; Antonio Valentin; Barbara K Felber; George N Pavlakis
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Non-contact helium-based plasma for delivery of DNA vaccines. Enhancement of humoral and cellular immune responses.

Authors:  Richard J Connolly; Taryn Chapman; Andrew M Hoff; Michele A Kutzler; Mark J Jaroszeski; Kenneth E Ugen
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Intradermal active full-length DNA Aβ42 immunization via electroporation leads to high anti-Aβ antibody levels in wild-type mice.

Authors:  Roger N Rosenberg; Min Fu; Doris Lambracht-Washington
Journal:  J Neuroimmunol       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.478

5.  Development of a novel, guinea pig-specific IFN-γ ELISPOT assay and characterization of guinea pig cytomegalovirus GP83-specific cellular immune responses following immunization with a modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA)-vectored GP83 vaccine.

Authors:  Peter A Gillis; Nelmary Hernandez-Alvarado; Josephine S Gnanandarajah; Felix Wussow; Don J Diamond; Mark R Schleiss
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Co-expression of the Bcl-xL antiapoptotic protein enhances the induction of Th1-like immune responses in mice immunized with DNA vaccines encoding FMDV B and T cell epitopes.

Authors:  Sultan Gülçe İz; Mert Döşkaya; Belen Borrego; Fernando Rodriguez; Yüksel Gürüz; Ismet Deliloğlu Gürhan
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.459

7.  Electroporation-mediated gene delivery.

Authors:  Jennifer L Young; David A Dean
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 1.944

8.  Electroporation mediated DNA vaccination directly to a mucosal surface results in improved immune responses.

Authors:  Gleb Kichaev; Janess M Mendoza; Dinah Amante; Trevor R F Smith; Jay R McCoy; Niranjan Y Sardesai; Kate E Broderick
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Electroporation delivery of DNA vaccines: prospects for success.

Authors:  Niranjan Y Sardesai; David B Weiner
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 7.486

10.  Molecular adjuvant HMGB1 enhances anti-influenza immunity during DNA vaccination.

Authors:  P Fagone; D J Shedlock; H Bao; O U Kawalekar; J Yan; D Gupta; M P Morrow; A Patel; G P Kobinger; K Muthumani; D B Weiner
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 5.250

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.