R Castano1, C Trudeau, H Ghezzo. 1. Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, Research Centre, Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada. roberto.castano@mail.mcgill.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the correlation between acoustic rhinometry and visual analogue scale endpoints in the context of nasal challenge with occupational agents. DESIGN: Prospective controlled study. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-seven subjects with a history of work-related rhinitis and asthma symptoms. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Subjects underwent nasal challenge with control and specific agent on consecutive days. Nasal congestive response to challenge was monitored by acoustic rhinometry and visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Results showed no correlation between visual analogue scale and acoustic rhinometry measurements at baseline on the control (r=-0.13, P=0.3) and active (r=0.14, P=0.2) challenge days. No correlation was found between acoustic rhinometry and visual analogue scale when analysing all measurements obtained at all times after challenge with the control and active agent (control: r=0.09, P=0.04; active: r=0.001, P=0.9). The correlation between acoustic rhinometry and visual analogue scale was good and significant (r=-0.62, P=<0.01) when the analysis was restricted to cases showing a decrease in nasal volume>40% from baseline values. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that the correlation between acoustic rhinometry and subjective nasal patency was poor on steady conditions. However, a significant correlation was observed in those cases showing a greater nasal congestive response after challenge measured by acoustic rhinometry.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the correlation between acoustic rhinometry and visual analogue scale endpoints in the context of nasal challenge with occupational agents. DESIGN: Prospective controlled study. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-seven subjects with a history of work-related rhinitis and asthma symptoms. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Subjects underwent nasal challenge with control and specific agent on consecutive days. Nasal congestive response to challenge was monitored by acoustic rhinometry and visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Results showed no correlation between visual analogue scale and acoustic rhinometry measurements at baseline on the control (r=-0.13, P=0.3) and active (r=0.14, P=0.2) challenge days. No correlation was found between acoustic rhinometry and visual analogue scale when analysing all measurements obtained at all times after challenge with the control and active agent (control: r=0.09, P=0.04; active: r=0.001, P=0.9). The correlation between acoustic rhinometry and visual analogue scale was good and significant (r=-0.62, P=<0.01) when the analysis was restricted to cases showing a decrease in nasal volume>40% from baseline values. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that the correlation between acoustic rhinometry and subjective nasal patency was poor on steady conditions. However, a significant correlation was observed in those cases showing a greater nasal congestive response after challenge measured by acoustic rhinometry.