Literature DB >> 21199244

Collaboration between mental health consumers and nurses: shared understandings, dissimilar experiences.

Andrea McCloughen1, Donna Gillies, Louise O'Brien.   

Abstract

Adopting a collaborative approach within clinical relationships is illustrative of consumers' and nurses' positive beliefs, values, and attitudes towards each other and their partnership. However, for collaboration to be successful, how roles are determined, how each partner relates to the other, and how decisions are to be made need to be clearly defined and agreed upon. The research study described here utilized a mixed-method approach comprising focus groups and surveys to explore the subjective understandings, attitudes, and experiences of consumer-nurse collaboration within a mental health rehabilitation context in order to more clearly determine the conditions for successful nurse-consumer collaboration. The study found that although consumers and nurses conceptualized collaboration in similar ways, their lived experiences were disparate. A key finding of the study was that mutual recognition of each others' knowledge and expertise is needed for successful collaboration. The study reinforced the need for consumers and nurses to establish common ground on which to collaborate and to articulate the behaviours and expectations of working collaboratively. While collaboration was acknowledged as a significant and desirable basis for therapeutic relationships, it was challenged by determinants of power, such as knowledge, information, and expertise.
© 2011 The Authors. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing © 2011 Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21199244     DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2010.00708.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 1445-8330            Impact factor:   3.503


  7 in total

1.  Effect of an institutional development plan for user participation on professionals' knowledge, practice, and attitudes. A controlled study.

Authors:  Marit By Rise; Hilde Grimstad; Marit Solbjør; Aslak Steinsbekk
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  The experience of Greek-Cypriot individuals living with mental illness: preliminary results of a phenomenological study.

Authors:  Charis P Kaite; Maria N Karanikola; Foteini J D Vouzavali; Anna Koutroubas; Anastasios Merkouris; Elizabeth D E Papathanassoglou
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.630

3.  Impact of collaborative nursing care on the recovery process of mental health day hospital users: a mixed-methods study protocol.

Authors:  Ana Ventosa-Ruiz; Antonio Moreno-Poyato; Teresa Lluch-Canut; Antonio Vaquerizo-Cubero; Xavier Vidal-Pascual; Ferran Gil-Guiñón; Montserrat Puig-Llobet
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Service User and Carer Views and Expectations of Mental Health Nurses: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nompilo Moyo; Martin Jones; Diana Kushemererwa; Noushin Arefadib; Adrian Jones; Sandesh Pantha; Richard Gray
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Strategic collaboration councils in the mental health services: what are they working with?

Authors:  Andreas Liljegren
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 5.120

6.  Determinants of the quality of care relationships in long-term care - a systematic review.

Authors:  Aukelien Scheffelaar; Nanne Bos; Michelle Hendriks; Sandra van Dulmen; Katrien Luijkx
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Qualitative instruments involving clients as co-researchers to assess and improve the quality of care relationships in long-term care: an evaluation of instruments to enhance client participation in quality research.

Authors:  Aukelien Scheffelaar; Nanne Bos; Mattanja Triemstra; Marjan de Jong; Katrien Luijkx; Sandra van Dulmen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.