Literature DB >> 21198900

Variation in the total lengths of abutment/implant assemblies generated with a function of applied tightening torque in external and internal implant-abutment connection.

Ki-Seong Kim1, Young-Jun Lim, Myung-Joo Kim, Ho-Beom Kwon, Jae-Ho Yang, Jai-Bong Lee, Soon-Ho Yim.   

Abstract

AIM: Settling (embedment relaxation), which is the main cause for screw loosening, is developed by microroughness between implant and abutment metal surface. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the relationship between the level of applied torque and the settling of abutments into implants in external and internal implant-abutment connection.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five different implant-abutment connections were used (Ext, External butt joint + two-piece abutment; Int-H2, Internal hexagon + two-piece abutment; Int-H1, Internal hexagon + one-piece abutment; Int-O2, Internal octagon + two-piece abutment; Int-O1, Internal octagon + one-piece abutment). All abutments of each group were assembled and tightened with corresponding implants by a digital torque gauge. The total lengths of implant-abutment samples were measured at each torque (5, 10, 30 N cm and repeated 30 N cm with 10-min interval) by an electronic digital micrometer. The settling values were calculated by changes between the total lengths of implant-abutment samples.
RESULTS: All groups developed settling with repeated tightening. The Int-H2 group showed markedly higher settling for all instances of tightening torque and the Ext group was the lowest. Statistically significant differences were found in settling values between the groups and statistically significant increases were observed within each group at different tightening torques (P<0.05). After the second tightening of 30 N cm, repeated tightening showed almost constant settling values.
CONCLUSIONS: Results from the present study suggested that to minimize the settling effect, abutment screws should be retightened at least twice at 30 N cm torque at a 10-min interval in all laboratory and clinical procedures.
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21198900     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02063.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  11 in total

1.  Analysis of fit on implants of chrome cobalt versus titanium frameworks made by cad / cam milling.

Authors:  Begoña Oteiza-Galdón; Amparo Martínez-González; Ángel-Vicente Escuder
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-10-01

2.  Complication incidence of two implant systems up to six years: a comparison between internal and external connection implants.

Authors:  Sung-Wook Chae; Young-Sung Kim; Yong-Moo Lee; Won-Kyung Kim; Young-Kyoo Lee; Su-Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.614

3.  Effect of cyclic loading and retightening on reverse torque value in external and internal implants.

Authors:  Woong-Rae Cho; Yoon-Hyuk Huh; Chan-Jin Park; Lee-Ra Cho
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  The effect of repeated torque tightening on total lengths of implant abutments in different internal implant‒abutment connections.

Authors:  Fariba Saleh Saber; Nader Abolfazli; Soheil Jannatii Ataei; Mahsa Taghizade Motlagh; Vahede Gharekhani
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2017-06-21

Review 5.  Systematic analysis of factors that cause loss of preload in dental implants.

Authors:  S Nithyapriya; A S Ramesh; A Kirubakaran; Jeevitha Mani; J Raghunathan
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

6.  Axial Displacements and Removal Torque Changes of Five Different Implant-Abutment Connections under Static Vertical Loading.

Authors:  Ki-Seong Kim; Young-Jun Lim
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Evaluation of reverse torque values and failure loads of three different abutment designs with internal connections.

Authors:  Saied Nokar; Habib Hajimiragha; Leyla Sadighpour; Azam Sadat Mostafavi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-12-10

8.  Effect of tightening torque on the marginal adaptation of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Jalil Ghanbarzadeh; Hossin Dashti; Reza Karamad; Marzieh Alikhasi; Mohammadreza Nakhaei
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

9.  Digital evaluation of axial displacement by implant-abutment connection type: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Sung-Jun Kim; KeunBaDa Son; Kyu-Bok Lee
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  Improved accuracy of digital implant impressions with newly designed scan bodies: an in vivo evaluation in beagle dogs.

Authors:  Ruoxuan Huang; Yuanxiang Liu; Baoxin Huang; Fengxing Zhou; Zhuofan Chen; Zhipeng Li
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.