BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We recently characterized LY2033298 as a novel allosteric modulator and agonist at M(4) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs). Evidence also suggested a difference in the potency of LY2033298 at rodent relative to human M(4) mAChRs. The current study investigated the basis for the species difference of this modulator and used this knowledge to rationalize its in vivo actions. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: LY2033298 was investigated in vitro in CHO cells stably expressing human or mouse M(4) mAChRs, using assays of agonist-induced ERK1/2 or GSK-3α phosphorylation, [(35) S]-GTPγS binding, or effects on equilibrium binding of [(3) H]-NMS and ACh. The in vivo actions of LY2033298 were investigated in a mouse model of amphetamine-induced locomotor activity. The function of LY2033298 was examined in combination with ACh, oxotremorine or xanomeline. KEY RESULTS: LY2033298 had similar affinities for the human and mouse M(4) mAChRs. However, LY2033298 had a lower positive co-operativity with ACh at the mouse relative to the human M(4) mAChR. At the mouse M(4) mAChR, LY2033298 showed higher co-operativity with oxotremorine than with ACh or xanomeline. The different degrees of co-operativity between LY2033298 and each agonist at the mouse relative to the human M(4) mAChR necessitated the co-administration of LY2033298 with oxotremorine in order to show in vivo efficacy of LY2033298. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These results provide evidence for species variability when comparing the allosteric interaction between LY2033298 and ACh at the M(4) mAChR, and also highlight how the interaction between LY2033298 and different orthosteric ligands is subject to 'probe dependence'. This has implications for the validation of allosteric modulator actions in vivo.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We recently characterized LY2033298 as a novel allosteric modulator and agonist at M(4) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs). Evidence also suggested a difference in the potency of LY2033298 at rodent relative to human M(4) mAChRs. The current study investigated the basis for the species difference of this modulator and used this knowledge to rationalize its in vivo actions. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: LY2033298 was investigated in vitro in CHO cells stably expressing human or mouse M(4) mAChRs, using assays of agonist-induced ERK1/2 or GSK-3α phosphorylation, [(35) S]-GTPγS binding, or effects on equilibrium binding of [(3) H]-NMS and ACh. The in vivo actions of LY2033298 were investigated in a mouse model of amphetamine-induced locomotor activity. The function of LY2033298 was examined in combination with ACh, oxotremorine or xanomeline. KEY RESULTS:LY2033298 had similar affinities for the human and mouse M(4) mAChRs. However, LY2033298 had a lower positive co-operativity with ACh at the mouse relative to the human M(4) mAChR. At the mouse M(4) mAChR, LY2033298 showed higher co-operativity with oxotremorine than with ACh or xanomeline. The different degrees of co-operativity between LY2033298 and each agonist at the mouse relative to the human M(4) mAChR necessitated the co-administration of LY2033298 with oxotremorine in order to show in vivo efficacy of LY2033298. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These results provide evidence for species variability when comparing the allosteric interaction between LY2033298 and ACh at the M(4) mAChR, and also highlight how the interaction between LY2033298 and different orthosteric ligands is subject to 'probe dependence'. This has implications for the validation of allosteric modulator actions in vivo.
Authors: H E Shannon; K Rasmussen; F P Bymaster; J C Hart; S C Peters; M D Swedberg; L Jeppesen; M J Sheardown; P Sauerberg; A Fink-Jensen Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2000-05-05 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Anantha Shekhar; William Z Potter; Jeffrey Lightfoot; John Lienemann; Sanjay Dubé; Craig Mallinckrodt; Frank P Bymaster; David L McKinzie; Christian C Felder Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2008-07-01 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Daniel J Foster; Patrick R Gentry; Jose E Lizardi-Ortiz; Thomas M Bridges; Michael R Wood; Colleen M Niswender; David Sulzer; Craig W Lindsley; Zixiu Xiang; P Jeffrey Conn Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Nellie E Byun; Michael Grannan; Michael Bubser; Robert L Barry; Analisa Thompson; John Rosanelli; Raajaram Gowrishankar; Nathaniel D Kelm; Stephen Damon; Thomas M Bridges; Bruce J Melancon; James C Tarr; John T Brogan; Malcolm J Avison; Ariel Y Deutch; Jürgen Wess; Michael R Wood; Craig W Lindsley; John C Gore; P Jeffrey Conn; Carrie K Jones Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2014-01-20 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: David M Thal; Bingfa Sun; Dan Feng; Vindhya Nawaratne; Katie Leach; Christian C Felder; Mark G Bures; David A Evans; William I Weis; Priti Bachhawat; Tong Sun Kobilka; Patrick M Sexton; Brian K Kobilka; Arthur Christopoulos Journal: Nature Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: R Schrage; W K Seemann; J Klöckner; C Dallanoce; K Racké; E Kostenis; M De Amici; U Holzgrabe; K Mohr Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 8.739