Literature DB >> 21198541

Impact of species variability and 'probe-dependence' on the detection and in vivo validation of allosteric modulation at the M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor.

S Suratman1, K Leach, Pm Sexton, Cc Felder, Re Loiacono, A Christopoulos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: We recently characterized LY2033298 as a novel allosteric modulator and agonist at M(4) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs). Evidence also suggested a difference in the potency of LY2033298 at rodent relative to human M(4) mAChRs. The current study investigated the basis for the species difference of this modulator and used this knowledge to rationalize its in vivo actions. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: LY2033298 was investigated in vitro in CHO cells stably expressing human or mouse M(4) mAChRs, using assays of agonist-induced ERK1/2 or GSK-3α phosphorylation, [(35) S]-GTPγS binding, or effects on equilibrium binding of [(3) H]-NMS and ACh. The in vivo actions of LY2033298 were investigated in a mouse model of amphetamine-induced locomotor activity. The function of LY2033298 was examined in combination with ACh, oxotremorine or xanomeline. KEY
RESULTS: LY2033298 had similar affinities for the human and mouse M(4) mAChRs. However, LY2033298 had a lower positive co-operativity with ACh at the mouse relative to the human M(4) mAChR. At the mouse M(4) mAChR, LY2033298 showed higher co-operativity with oxotremorine than with ACh or xanomeline. The different degrees of co-operativity between LY2033298 and each agonist at the mouse relative to the human M(4) mAChR necessitated the co-administration of LY2033298 with oxotremorine in order to show in vivo efficacy of LY2033298. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These results provide evidence for species variability when comparing the allosteric interaction between LY2033298 and ACh at the M(4) mAChR, and also highlight how the interaction between LY2033298 and different orthosteric ligands is subject to 'probe dependence'. This has implications for the validation of allosteric modulator actions in vivo.
© 2011 The Authors. British Journal of Pharmacology © 2011 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21198541      PMCID: PMC3057301          DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01184.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0007-1188            Impact factor:   8.739


  44 in total

1.  Multiple muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes modulate striatal dopamine release, as studied with M1-M5 muscarinic receptor knock-out mice.

Authors:  Weilie Zhang; Masahisa Yamada; Jesus Gomeza; Anthony S Basile; Jürgen Wess
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Muscarinic receptors: do they have a role in the pathology and treatment of schizophrenia?

Authors:  Elizabeth Scarr; Brian Dean
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 5.372

3.  GABAergic modulation of benzodiazepine binding site sensitivity.

Authors:  J F Tallman; J W Thomas; D W Gallager
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-07-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  The classification of seven transmembrane receptors in recombinant expression systems.

Authors:  T Kenakin
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 25.468

5.  Xanomeline, an M(1)/M(4) preferring muscarinic cholinergic receptor agonist, produces antipsychotic-like activity in rats and mice.

Authors:  H E Shannon; K Rasmussen; F P Bymaster; J C Hart; S C Peters; M D Swedberg; L Jeppesen; M J Sheardown; P Sauerberg; A Fink-Jensen
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2000-05-05       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Both extracellular and transmembrane residues contribute to the species selectivity of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist WIN 51708.

Authors:  B S Sachais; J E Krause
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.436

7.  Selective muscarinic receptor agonist xanomeline as a novel treatment approach for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Anantha Shekhar; William Z Potter; Jeffrey Lightfoot; John Lienemann; Sanjay Dubé; Craig Mallinckrodt; Frank P Bymaster; David L McKinzie; Christian C Felder
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 8.  Allosteric GPCR modulators: taking advantage of permissive receptor pharmacology.

Authors:  Katie Leach; Patrick M Sexton; Arthur Christopoulos
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 14.819

9.  Molecular cloning and functional characterization of a human 5-HT1B serotonin receptor: a homologue of the rat 5-HT1B receptor with 5-HT1D-like pharmacological specificity.

Authors:  M W Hamblin; M A Metcalf; R W McGuffin; S Karpells
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1992-04-30       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 10.  Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors as CNS drug targets.

Authors:  Christopher J Langmead; Jeannette Watson; Charlie Reavill
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 12.310

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Biased signalling and allosteric machines: new vistas and challenges for drug discovery.

Authors:  Terry P Kenakin
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  LY2033298, a positive allosteric modulator at muscarinic M₄ receptors, enhances inhibition by oxotremorine of light-induced phase shifts in hamster circadian activity rhythms.

Authors:  Robert L Gannon; Mark J Millan
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Emerging paradigms in GPCR allostery: implications for drug discovery.

Authors:  Denise Wootten; Arthur Christopoulos; Patrick M Sexton
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 4.  New concepts in pharmacological efficacy at 7TM receptors: IUPHAR review 2.

Authors:  Terry Kenakin
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 5.  Emerging approaches for treatment of schizophrenia: modulation of cholinergic signaling.

Authors:  Daniel J Foster; Carrie K Jones; P Jeffrey Conn
Journal:  Discov Med       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.970

Review 6.  Development of M1 mAChR allosteric and bitopic ligands: prospective therapeutics for the treatment of cognitive deficits.

Authors:  Briana J Davie; Arthur Christopoulos; Peter J Scammells
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 4.418

7.  M5 receptor activation produces opposing physiological outcomes in dopamine neurons depending on the receptor's location.

Authors:  Daniel J Foster; Patrick R Gentry; Jose E Lizardi-Ortiz; Thomas M Bridges; Michael R Wood; Colleen M Niswender; David Sulzer; Craig W Lindsley; Zixiu Xiang; P Jeffrey Conn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Antipsychotic drug-like effects of the selective M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor positive allosteric modulator VU0152100.

Authors:  Nellie E Byun; Michael Grannan; Michael Bubser; Robert L Barry; Analisa Thompson; John Rosanelli; Raajaram Gowrishankar; Nathaniel D Kelm; Stephen Damon; Thomas M Bridges; Bruce J Melancon; James C Tarr; John T Brogan; Malcolm J Avison; Ariel Y Deutch; Jürgen Wess; Michael R Wood; Craig W Lindsley; John C Gore; P Jeffrey Conn; Carrie K Jones
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  Crystal structures of the M1 and M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  David M Thal; Bingfa Sun; Dan Feng; Vindhya Nawaratne; Katie Leach; Christian C Felder; Mark G Bures; David A Evans; William I Weis; Priti Bachhawat; Tong Sun Kobilka; Patrick M Sexton; Brian K Kobilka; Arthur Christopoulos
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Agonists with supraphysiological efficacy at the muscarinic M2 ACh receptor.

Authors:  R Schrage; W K Seemann; J Klöckner; C Dallanoce; K Racké; E Kostenis; M De Amici; U Holzgrabe; K Mohr
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 8.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.