Literature DB >> 21198379

The Need for Patient-Subjective Data in the DSM and the ICD.

Elizabeth H Flanagan1, Larry Davidson, John S Strauss.   

Abstract

One improvement from the second to the third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders was to replace clinicians' subjective interpretations of mental disorders with objective descriptions of signs and symptoms that could be rated reliably across investigators. Along with clinicians' subjective impressions, however, the subjective experiences of the person with the mental disorder were minimized. This information could be valuable, as people's subjective experiences of disorders may indicate major underlying processes and be different from how characteristics of disorders appear objectively to outside observers. The authors suggest that empirically derived, patient-subjective characteristics of mental disorders be incorporated into future editions of the DSM and the ICD. Not only will these data offer important information that will help to enhance the accuracy of the diagnostic categories of the DSM and ICD, but such data also may serve to enhance clinicians' abilities to conceptualize accurately and empathically treat these disorders in their patients. Examples of patient-subjective criteria and their relationship to current DSM criteria are examined for borderline personality disorder and schizophrenia and suggestions for DSM-V and ICD-11 are offered. Diagnostic criteria that accurately reflect patients' subjective experience could also increase clinicians' ability to empathize with patients, one of the most important variables in treatment alliances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21198379     DOI: 10.1521/psyc.2010.73.4.297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry        ISSN: 0033-2747            Impact factor:   2.458


  3 in total

1.  Personality Functioning and Mentalizing in Patients With Subthreshold or Diagnosed Borderline Personality Disorder: Implications for ICD-11.

Authors:  Marie Zerafine Rishede; Sophie Juul; Sune Bo; Matthias Gondan; Stine Bjerrum Møeller; Sebastian Simonsen
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.157

2.  Patient advocacy and DSM-5.

Authors:  Dan J Stein; Katharine A Phillips
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 8.775

3.  The Patients' Practises Disclosing Subjective Experiences in the Psychiatric Intake Interview.

Authors:  Enikö Èva Savander; Jukka Hintikka; Mariel Wuolio; Anssi Peräkylä
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.157

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.