Literature DB >> 21198366

The measurement of cyberbullying: dimensional structure and relative item severity and discrimination.

Ersilia Menesini1, Annalaura Nocentini, Pamela Calussi.   

Abstract

In relation to a sample of 1,092 Italian adolescents (50.9% females), the present study aims to: (a) analyze the most parsimonious structure of the cyberbullying and cybervictimization construct in male and female Italian adolescents through confirmatory factor analysis; and (b) analyze the severity and the discrimination parameters of each act using the item response theory. Results showed that the structure of the cyberbullying scale for perpetrated and received behaviors in both genders could best be represented by a monodimensional model where each item lies on a continuum of severity of aggressive acts. For both genders, the less severe acts are silent/prank calls and insults on instant messaging, and the most severe acts are unpleasant pictures/photos on Web sites, phone pictures/photos/videos of intimate scenes, and phone pictures/photos/videos of violent scenes. The items nasty text messages, nasty or rude e-mails, insults on Web sites, insults in chatrooms, and insults on blogs range from moderate to high levels of severity. Regarding the discrimination level of the acts, several items emerged as good indicators at various levels of cyberbullying and cybervictimization severity, with the exception of silent/prank calls. Furthermore, gender specificities underlined that the visual items can be considered good indicators of severe cyberbullies and cybervictims only in males. This information can help in understanding better the nature of the phenomenon, its severity in a given population, and to plan more specific prevention and intervention strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21198366     DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw        ISSN: 2152-2715


  11 in total

1.  Individual and contextual predictors of cyberbullying: the influence of children's provictim attitudes and teachers' ability to intervene.

Authors:  L Christian Elledge; Anne Williford; Aaron J Boulton; Kathryn J Depaolis; Todd D Little; Christina Salmivalli
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2013-02-01

2.  Cyberbullying definition among adolescents: a comparison across six European countries.

Authors:  Ersilia Menesini; Annalaura Nocentini; Benedetta Emanuela Palladino; Ann Frisén; Sofia Berne; Rosario Ortega-Ruiz; Juan Calmaestra; Herbert Scheithauer; Anja Schultze-Krumbholz; Piret Luik; Karin Naruskov; Catherine Blaya; Julien Berthaud; Peter K Smith
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw       Date:  2012-07-20

3.  The Role of Online Communication in Long-Term Cyberbullying Involvement Among Girls and Boys.

Authors:  Ruth Festl; Thorsten Quandt
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2016-07-29

4.  How many cyberbullying(s)? A non-unitary perspective for offensive online behaviours.

Authors:  Stefano Guidi; Paola Palmitesta; Margherita Bracci; Enrica Marchigiani; Ileana Di Pomponio; Oronzo Parlangeli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Do Neighbors Have More Peaceful Students? Youth Violence Profiles among Adolescents in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia.

Authors:  Dóra Eszter Várnai; Marta Malinowska-Cieślik; Andrea Madarasová Gecková; Ladislav Csémy; Zsolt Horváth
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Moral Disengagement and Risk Prototypes in the Context of Adolescent Cyberbullying: Findings From Two Countries.

Authors:  Lambros Lazuras; Antonella Brighi; Vassilis Barkoukis; Annalisa Guarini; Haralambos Tsorbatzoudis; Maria Luisa Genta
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-08-08

7.  Cyberbullying among Adolescents: Psychometric Properties of the CYB-AGS Cyber-Aggressor Scale.

Authors:  Sofia Buelga; Javier Postigo; Belén Martínez-Ferrer; María-Jesús Cava; Jessica Ortega-Barón
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Link Between Cyberbullying Victimization and Perpetration Among Undergraduates: Mediating Effects of Trait Anger and Moral Disengagement.

Authors:  Xiaohua Sun; Liang Chen; Guangbo Dou; Ying Xiang
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2020-12-21

9.  Investigating the Comparability of Two Multi-Item-Scales for Cyber Bullying Measurement.

Authors:  Julia Fluck
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Applying artificial intelligence to explore sexual cyberbullying behaviour.

Authors:  Agustín J Sánchez-Medina; Inmaculada Galván-Sánchez; Margarita Fernández-Monroy
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-01-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.