PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of acute renal failure (ARF) in patients with mild to moderate renal dysfunction, receiving renally adjusted zoledronic acid (ZA) and compare it to patients with normal baseline renal function, receiving standard-dose ZA. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients receiving ZA for the treatment of bone metastasis due to cancer. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) normal group with baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) of greater than 60 mL/min and standard ZA dose; (2) impaired group with baseline CrCl of 30-60 mL/min and renally adjusted ZA dose. Primary endpoint of ARF was defined as an increase in serum creatinine (SCr) of 0.5 mg/dL or 1.0 mg/dL from a baseline SCr of <1.4 mg/dL or ≥ 1.4 mg/dL, respectively. RESULTS: In total, 1,472 evaluable doses of ZA were given to 220 patients. Of these, 184 patients were in the normal group and 36 patients in the impaired group. There were 38 patients (20.7%) who developed ARF in the normal group versus 7 patients (19.4%) in the impaired group. There was no difference in the mean time to the incidence of ARF at 6.1 months in both groups. Incidence of ARF based on CrCl (≥ 25% decline in CrCl) was similar between groups (39.1% vs. 41.7%; p = 0.78). CONCLUSION: The incidence of ARF is similar between patients in the normal group and impaired group when the ZA dose is renally adjusted.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of acute renal failure (ARF) in patients with mild to moderate renal dysfunction, receiving renally adjusted zoledronic acid (ZA) and compare it to patients with normal baseline renal function, receiving standard-dose ZA. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients receiving ZA for the treatment of bone metastasis due to cancer. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) normal group with baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) of greater than 60 mL/min and standard ZA dose; (2) impaired group with baseline CrCl of 30-60 mL/min and renally adjusted ZA dose. Primary endpoint of ARF was defined as an increase in serum creatinine (SCr) of 0.5 mg/dL or 1.0 mg/dL from a baseline SCr of <1.4 mg/dL or ≥ 1.4 mg/dL, respectively. RESULTS: In total, 1,472 evaluable doses of ZA were given to 220 patients. Of these, 184 patients were in the normal group and 36 patients in the impaired group. There were 38 patients (20.7%) who developed ARF in the normal group versus 7 patients (19.4%) in the impaired group. There was no difference in the mean time to the incidence of ARF at 6.1 months in both groups. Incidence of ARF based on CrCl (≥ 25% decline in CrCl) was similar between groups (39.1% vs. 41.7%; p = 0.78). CONCLUSION: The incidence of ARF is similar between patients in the normal group and impaired group when the ZA dose is renally adjusted.
Authors: L S Rosen; D Gordon; M Kaminski; A Howell; A Belch; J Mackey; J Apffelstaedt; M Hussein; R E Coleman; D J Reitsma; J J Seaman; B L Chen; Y Ambros Journal: Cancer J Date: 2001 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.360
Authors: William K Oh; Kevin Proctor; Mari Nakabayashi; Carolyn Evan; Lauren K Tormey; Timothy Daskivich; Lucia Antràs; Michael Smith; Maureen P Neary; Mei Sheng Duh Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-03-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: James R Berenson; Bruce E Hillner; Robert A Kyle; Ken Anderson; Allan Lipton; Gary C Yee; J Sybil Biermann Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-09-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lee S Rosen; David Gordon; Simon Tchekmedyian; Ronald Yanagihara; Vera Hirsh; M Krzakowski; M Pawlicki; Paul de Souza; Ming Zheng; Gladys Urbanowitz; Dirk Reitsma; John J Seaman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-08-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Glen S Markowitz; Paul L Fine; Jay I Stack; Cheryl L Kunis; Jai Radhakrishnan; Winicjusz Palecki; Jin Park; Samih H Nasr; Shirley Hoh; David S Siegel; Vivette D D'Agati Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Ingo J Diel; Rudolf Weide; Hubert Köppler; Lucia Antràs; Michael Smith; Jesse Green; Neil Wintfeld; Maureen Neary; Mei Sheng Duh Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2008-12-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Fred Saad; Donald M Gleason; Robin Murray; Simon Tchekmedyian; Peter Venner; Louis Lacombe; Joseph L Chin; Jeferson J Vinholes; J Allen Goas; Bee Chen Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-10-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Robert A Kyle; Gary C Yee; Mark R Somerfield; Patrick J Flynn; Susan Halabi; Sundar Jagannath; Robert Z Orlowski; David G Roodman; Patricia Twilde; Kenneth Anderson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-05-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lee S Rosen; David Gordon; Mary Kaminski; Anthony Howell; Andrew Belch; John Mackey; Justus Apffelstaedt; Mohamad A Hussein; Robert E Coleman; Dirk J Reitsma; Bee-Lian Chen; John J Seaman Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: S Schmitt; T Hielscher; C Baldus; K Neben; G Egerer; J Hillengaß; M Raab; D Hose; A D Ho; R Bergner; H Goldschmidt; T M Moehler Journal: Int J Hematol Date: 2013-04-25 Impact factor: 2.490
Authors: H Shibata; S Kato; I Sekine; K Abe; N Araki; H Iguchi; T Izumi; Y Inaba; I Osaka; S Kato; A Kawai; S Kinuya; M Kodaira; E Kobayashi; T Kobayashi; J Sato; N Shinohara; S Takahashi; Y Takamatsu; K Takayama; K Takayama; U Tateishi; H Nagakura; M Hosaka; H Morioka; T Moriya; T Yuasa; T Yurikusa; K Yomiya; M Yoshida Journal: ESMO Open Date: 2016-03-16