Literature DB >> 21197524

Safety and efficacy comparison of blue versus red light sources for photodynamic therapy using methyl aminolevulinate in photodamaged skin.

Melanie D Palm1, Mitchel P Goldman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) is a recently FDA-approved molecule for photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment of nonhyperkeratotic actinic keratoses (AK). In the U.S., aminolevulinic acid (ALA) has been used in an off-label manner with photodynamic therapy for the treatment of chronic photodamage. The published use of MAL-PDT for photorejuvenation is more limited. MAL-PDT is usually conducted with a red light source, ALA-PDT with a blue light source. The purpose of this study is to compare the use of red versus blue light sources in the treatment of photodamage using MAL-PDT, measuring safety and efficacy outcomes following treatment. STUDY DESIGN/
MATERIAL AND METHODS: eighteen adult patients with moderate-to-severe photodamage of the head or upper trunk were enrolled in a prospective, single center trial of MAL-PDT for photorejuvenation. Intrapatient randomization determined split-area treatment with a blue or red light source. The majority of patients were also treated with pulsed dye laser (PDL) and/or intense pulsed light (IPL) for photoactivation. Digitial photography documented the treatment area at each visit (days 0, 2, 7 and 30). Patient and physician scoring of photodamage occurred at baseline and final visits. Side effects following MAL-PDT were evaluated.
RESULTS: no statistically significant differences in signs of photodamage following MAL-PDT were observed between blue versus red light treated sides. The greatest improvement in photodamage measures following 1 MAL-PDT were pigmentation, AK and erythema. Side effects were mild in nature and did not differ between treatment sides, and all but mild erythema resolved by day 7.
CONCLUSION: blue and red light have similar efficacy as the light source for MAL-PDT when combined with other light sources. Side effects following MAL-PDT with red versus blue light were similar and mild in severity. MAL-PDT is an effective treatment modality for chronic photodamage, in particular AK and pigmentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21197524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Drugs Dermatol        ISSN: 1545-9616            Impact factor:   2.114


  5 in total

1.  The effect of multiple sequential light sources to activate aminolevulinic Acid in the treatment of actinic keratoses: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Daniel P Friedmann; Mitchel P Goldman; Sabrina G Fabi; Isabella Guiha
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2014-09

2.  White light-informed optical properties improve ultrasound-guided fluorescence tomography of photoactive protoporphyrin IX.

Authors:  Brendan P Flynn; Alisha V DSouza; Stephen C Kanick; Scott C Davis; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 3.  Current evidence and applications of photodynamic therapy in dermatology.

Authors:  Marilyn T Wan; Jennifer Y Lin
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2014-05-21

4.  Comparing desferrioxamine and light fractionation enhancement of ALA-PpIX photodynamic therapy in skin cancer.

Authors:  Ana Luiza Ribeiro de Souza; Kayla Marra; Jason Gunn; Kimberley S Samkoe; Stephen Chad Kanick; Scott C Davis; M Shane Chapman; Edward V Maytin; Tayyaba Hasan; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 5.  Photodynamic and photobiological effects of light-emitting diode (LED) therapy in dermatological disease: an update.

Authors:  Elisabetta Sorbellini; Mariangela Rucco; Fabio Rinaldi
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-07-14       Impact factor: 3.161

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.