| Literature DB >> 21197449 |
Hirohisa Okuma1, Yasuhisa Kitagawa, Shigeharu Takagi.
Abstract
Antiphospholipid syndrome is characterized by arterial or venous thrombosis and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). We measured β2-GPI aCL, IgGaCL, LA, antiphosphatidyl-serine antibody (PS), and antiphosphatidyl-inositol antibody (PI) in each patient at one month after the onset of stroke. In addition, carotid artery echography was performed in patients positive for PI or PS. Among the 250 patients, 13.6% (34/250) were positive for either PI or PS, and 6.8% (17/250) were positive for both. Carotid artery echography performed on these 34 patients showed that the frequencies of increased intimal-medial thickness (IMT) of 1.1 mm or more, plaque, and carotid artery stenosis of 50% or more were all significantly higher in patients positive for antinuclear antibody than those negative for the antibody (P < .05). PI and PS are associated with antinuclear antibody and precipitation of atherosclerosis. Ischemic stroke patients with SLE frequently showed a variety of antiphospholipid-protein antibodies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21197449 PMCID: PMC3010657 DOI: 10.1155/2010/439230
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Dev Immunol ISSN: 1740-2522
Antiphospholipid-protein antibodies in stroke patients with SLE.
| Case | Age/Gender |
| IgG-aCL | LA | PI | PS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 M | + | − | + | − | + |
| 2 | 41 F | + | − | + | − | − |
| 3 | 29 F | + | + | + | − | − |
| 4 | 31 F | + | + | + | + | + |
| 5 | 46 F | − | − | − | + | + |
Clinical and laboratory findings in patients with PI and PS.
| Case | Age | Gender | PI | PS |
| ANA | Type of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (y) | stroke | ||||||
| 1 | 68 | Male | 0.5 | 1.4 | (−) | D80× | L |
| 2 | 63 | Male | 1.1 | 1 | (−) | D80× | C |
| 3 | 72 | Male | 2.1 | 0.6 | (−) | (−) | L |
| 4 | 58 | Male | 1.9 | 1.7 | (−) | D80× | A |
| 5 | 64 | Female | 1.6 | 1.5 | (−) | D80× | L |
| 6 | 78 | Male | 0.8 | 1.3 | (−) | D40× | L |
| 7 | 48. | Female | 1.9 | 1.5 | (−) | D640× | L |
| 8 | 66 | Male | 1 | 0.5 | (−) | (−) | L |
| 9 | 43 | Male | 1.8 | 0.7 | (−) | N160× | A |
| 10 | 71 | Male | 1.1 | 1 | (−) | SP40× | L |
| 11 | 70 | Male | 1.9 | 0.8 | (−) | D80× | A |
| 12 | 60 | Male | 1.4 | 1.1 | (−) | D40× | A |
| 13 | 64 | Male | 1.1 | 0.9 | (−) | SP40× | L |
| 14 | 49 | Male | 2.1 | 0.9 | (−) LA + | (−) | A |
| 15 | 58 | Male | 1.5 | 1.4 | (−) | D+N40× | A |
| 16 | 68 | Female | 1.5 | 1.2 | (−) | D160× | L |
| 17 | 53 | Female | 8.1 | 1.1 | (−) | SP N80× | A |
| 18 | 72 | Female | 1.5 | 1 | (−) | SP80× | L |
| 19 | 71 | Male | 1 | 0.7 | (−) | (−) | L |
| 20 | 73 | Female | 1.3 | 0.8 | (−) | SP80× | L |
| 21 | 64. | Female | 1.1 | 1.3 | (−) | D640× | A |
| 22 | 81 | Male | 1 | 0.9 | (−) | SP40× | L |
| 23 | 76. | Male | 1.3 | 1.6 | (−) | SP40× | A |
| 24 | 80 | Male | 1 | 1.3 | (−) | D80× | A |
| 25 | 83 | Female | 0.7 | 1.4 | (−) | (−) | A |
| 26 | 44 | Male | 2.1 | 1.3 | (−) | D2560× | C |
| 27 | 52. | Male | 2.1 | 2.9 | (−) | SP40× | A |
| 28 | 79 | Male | 0.7 | 1.1 | (−) | (−) | L |
| 29 | 76 | Female | 0.8 | 1.1 | (−) | D80× | L |
| 30 | 65 | Male | 0.8 | 1.1 | (−) | SP40× | L |
| 31 | 63. | Female | 0.5 | 1.8 | (−) | SP40× | C |
| 32 | 31 | Male | 1.4 | 1.3 | (+) LA + | D320× | A |
| 33 | 50 | Male | 0.5 | 1.1 | (+) LA + | (−) | A |
| 34 | 46 | Female | 5.2 | 7.6 | (−) | SP80× | A |
L: lacunar infarction, A: atherothrombotic infarction, C: cardiogenic embolism D: diffuse pattern, SP: speckled pattern, and N: nucleolar pattern.
Carotid artery echography findings of PI or PS positive patients.
| PS or PI positive patients |
| |
|---|---|---|
| IMT | 48% |
|
| IMT < 1.1 mm | 23% | |
| Plaque positive | 48% |
|
| Plaque negative | 21% | |
| Carotid artery stenosis | 62% |
|
| Carotid artery stenosis <50% | 31% | |
IMT: intimal-medial thickness (n = 34)