Literature DB >> 21197426

Surgical treatment of a giant liposarcoma in a Japanese man.

Yasuhiro Hashimoto1, Shingo Hatakeyama, Tokushi Tachiwada, Takahiro Yoneyama, Takuya Koie, Noritaka Kamimura, Takeshi Yanagisawa, Kenichi Hakamada, Chikara Ohyama.   

Abstract

We report a case of a rapidly progressing giant retroperitoneal liposarcoma weighing 22 kg in a 41-year-old Japanese man, successfully treated with surgical excision. To our knowledge, this is the largest liposarcoma in the Japanese population reported in the literature.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21197426      PMCID: PMC3010627          DOI: 10.1155/2010/943073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Urol        ISSN: 1687-6369


1. Introduction

Liposarcoma is a common soft tissue sarcoma which occurs in adults [1, 2]. Its common sites of occurrence are the extremities, retroperitoneum, and inguinal region [3]. Although liposarcomas can often grow into large tumors, resected tumors weighing over 20 kg are extremely rare and considered to be “giant liposarcomas.” Here, we report our experience of a giant retroperitoneal liposarcoma, presumably the largest reported from Japan; it weighed 22 kg and caused abdominal swelling, marked leg edema, and cough due to the pressure it exerted on the patient's diaphragm.

2. Case Presentation

A 41-year-old Japanese man became aware of abdominal swelling in December 2008 but did not seek a medical opinion until he developed marked leg edema, a 30 kg weight gain, and cough. He was hospitalized the same day after a retroperitoneal tumor was detected by computed tomography (CT). After hospitalization, the patient was diagnosed with a liposarcoma by CT-guided needle biopsy. The patient was emergently transferred to our hospital due to worsening respiratory status. On admission his body surface area was 2.18 m2. A CT scan detected a 43 × 37 × 31 cm tumor in the right retroperitoneum, with the right kidney significantly displaced to the left and anterior side (Figure 1). Whole-body CT scan detected no metastasis. His condition was diagnosed as respiratory failure due to elevation of the diaphragm as a consequence of the rapid growth of the tumor (Figure 2).
Figure 1

Computerized tomography detected a 43 × 37 × 31-cm tumor in the right retroperitoneum, and the right kidney was deflected greatly to the left ventral side (white arrow).

Figure 2

Chest X-ray showed that elevation of the diaphragm due to rapid growth of retroperitoneal tumor and cardiac enlargement.

We concluded that surgical resection was the only option for saving the patient's life, so we performed a tumorectomy 3 weeks later through a midline incision. The operation took 3 hours and 20 minutes, and the estimated blood loss was 3990 mL requiring 800 mL blood transfusion. During surgery, the tumor and right kidney were completely resected. Pathological examination showed that the resected mass weighed 22 kg and was 45 × 40 × 30 cm in size (Figure 3). Grossly, the tumor was well encapsulated and transverse sectioning revealed a solid multinodular tumor mass. Histopathologic analysis demonstrated many spindle cells with high-grade atypia; some of which were lipoblasts on a myxoid background; there were no split signals on FISH analysis using CHOP DNA probes, thus leading to the diagnosis of dedifferentiated liposarcoma (Figure 4). Microscopically, no tumor cells were identified in the right kidney and this was an R0 resection. He declined adjuvant therapy. The patient was discharged from our hospital after 18 days. His body surface area at discharge was 1.66 m2. A CT scan performed 12 months after surgery detected no recurrence.
Figure 3

Intra-operative findings. The retroperitoneal tumor weighing 22 kg was extirpated.

Figure 4

Histopathological findings of the tumor diagnosed dedifferentiated liposarcoma (HE stain, original magnification x200). (a) Most of the tumor cells consisted of spindle cells with high-grade atypia. (b) Some of which were identified to be lipoblasts in a myxoid background.

3. Discussion

Liposarcoma is the most common soft tissue sarcoma and accounts for 10–20% of all cases. It commonly occurs between 40–60 years of age and has a 1:1 ratio between genders [1, 2]. Liposarcoma occurs most commonly in the extremities (52%), retroperitoneum (19%), and inguinal region (12%) [3]. Although liposarcomas sometimes weigh as much as 10 kg or more, those exceeding 20 kg are extremely rare. Some published reports have noted tumors weighing 103.6 lb (46.6 kg) [4], 42 kg [5], and 18 kg [6]. According to previous reports, the heaviest tumor to date in the Japanese population was 18 kg [7]. Thus, we believe that we have resected the largest retroperitoneal liposarcoma in Japan. According to the WHO classification, liposarcomas can be classified into five histologic types: well differentiated, myxoid, round cell, pleomorphic, and dedifferentiated [8]. The myxoid and round-cell types are considered subtypes because of their common chromosomal translocation [9-12]. Dalal argued, on the basis of a study conducted at a single facility, that the most common forms of liposarcoma are well differentiated (46%), dedifferentiated (18%), myxoid (18%), round cell (10%), and pleomorphic (8%). A chimera gene, TLS-CHOP, which is only found in myxoid-type sarcomas, was discovered in a myxoid-type liposarcoma. This gene is presumed to be responsible for tumor growth [9-12]. It can often be difficult to distinguish between myxoid-type and dedifferentiated liposarcomas. Nevertheless, we observed no split signals on FISH analysis using CHOP DNA probes. Surgical resection is still the principal treatment, and combined resection of involved organs is necessary for an R0 resection in many cases. A previous report stated that combined resection of adjacent organs is required in 75% of retroperitoneal tumors treated by tumorectomy [13]. Multimodality therapies such as chemotherapy with ifosfamide, anthracycline, and doxorubicin, as well as the combination of intraoperative and intensity-modulated radiotherapy, are also effective [14]. Recently, Ecteinascidin (ET743), an alkaloid derived from the Caribbean sea squirt (Ecteinascidia turbinate), has shown definite activity in soft tissue sarcoma in clinical trials [14]. However, high-grade liposarcoma may benefit from radiotherapy or chemotherapy with a reduction in local recurrence, but with no benefit in overall survival [14]. Histologic grading is important in liposarcoma, with disease-specific survival rates after 5 years of 93% for well-differentiated, 74–92% for myxoid/round-cell, 59% for pleomorphic, and 44% for dedifferentiated forms [15]. 83% of patients with dedifferentiated liposarcomas develop local recurrence, and 30% develop distant metastasis [16]. Here, we report the largest retroperitoneal liposarcoma in Japan. Judging from evidence in previously published reports, we expect a poor prognosis for the patient and will be closely following him for recurrence.
  13 in total

1.  A clinical and pathological staging system for soft tissue sarcomas.

Authors:  W O Russell; J Cohen; F Enzinger; S I Hajdu; H Heise; R G Martin; W Meissner; W T Miller; R L Schmitz; H D Suit
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  William M Mendenhall; Robert A Zlotecki; Steven N Hochwald; Alan W Hemming; Stephen R Grobmyer; William G Cance
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Giant retroperitoneal liposarcoma.

Authors:  Katsuki Inoue; Yoshio Higaki; Hideki Yoshida
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.369

4.  Retroperitoneal and scrotal giant liposarcoma: report of a case.

Authors:  S Yol; S Tavli; L Tavli; M Belviranli; A Yosunkaya
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Subtype specific prognostic nomogram for patients with primary liposarcoma of the retroperitoneum, extremity, or trunk.

Authors:  Kimberly Moore Dalal; Michael W Kattan; Cristina R Antonescu; Murray F Brennan; Samuel Singer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Retroperitoneal liposarcoma weighing over one hundred pounds with review of the literature.

Authors:  Olivia J McCallum; James J Burke; Alex J Childs; Alex Ferro; Donald G Gallup
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 7.  Diagnosis and management of lipomatous tumors.

Authors:  Kimberly Moore Dalal; Cristina R Antonescu; Samuel Singer
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Rearrangement of the transcription factor gene CHOP in myxoid liposarcomas with t(12;16)(q13;p11).

Authors:  P Aman; D Ron; N Mandahl; T Fioretos; S Heim; K Arheden; H Willén; A Rydholm; F Mitelman
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  Retroperitoneal sarcoma: the University of Florida experience.

Authors:  J W Kilkenny; K I Bland; E M Copeland
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Sarcomas and other malignancies of soft tissue, retroperitoneum, peritoneum, pleura, heart, mediastinum, and spleen.

Authors:  T M Mack
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Clinicopathological characteristics and experience in the treatment of giant retroperitoneal liposarcoma: A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Xiangyu Zeng; Weizhen Liu; Xiuli Wu; Jinbo Gao; Peng Zhang; Xiaoming Shuai; Kaixiong Tao
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.742

2.  Huge retroperitoneal liposarcoma.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Akhoondinasab; Mahmoud Omranifard
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Giant retroperitoneal liposarcoma: Case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Antonio Caizzone; Edoardo Saladino; Francesco Fleres; Cosimo Paviglianiti; Francesco Iaropoli; Carmelo Mazzeo; Eugenio Cucinotta; Antonio Macrì
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-02-17

4.  Giant retroperitoneal liposarcoma with a maximum diameter of 37 cm: a case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Chi Xu; Zhiqiang Ma; Hui Zhang; Jianchun Yu; Shuguang Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10

5.  A systematic review of margin status in retroperitoneal liposarcomas: Does the R0 margin matter?

Authors:  Benjamin Paik; Chin Jin Seo; Joey Wee-Shan Tan; Wen Kai Darryl Juan; Khee Chee Soo; Chin-Ann Johnny Ong; Claramae Shulyn Chia; Jolene Si Min Wong
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Giant retroperitoneal liposarcoma treated with radical conservative surgery: A case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Eva Lieto; Francesca Cardella; Silvia Erario; Giovanni Del Sorbo; Alfonso Reginelli; Gennaro Galizia; Fabrizio Urraro; Iacopo Panarese; Annamaria Auricchio
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 1.534

7.  A recurrent giant retroperitoneal myxoid liposarcoma: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Shanshan Guo; Yingying Xu; Feng Qian; Jingfan Ma; Shaojun Wang; Ping Chen; Liang Zong
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.